Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Comparison Among Extraperitoneal Single-port and Transperitoneal Multiport Radical Prostatectomy-A Single-center Experience

被引:1
作者
Pettenuzzo, Greta [1 ,2 ]
Ditonno, Francesco [2 ,3 ]
Cannoletta, Donato [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Pacini, Matteo [1 ,6 ]
Morgantini, Luca [1 ]
Sauer, Ruben Calvo [1 ]
Torres-Anguiano, Juan R. [1 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [4 ]
Briganti, Alberto [4 ]
Bartoletti, Riccardo [6 ]
Veccia, Alessandro [2 ]
Bertolo, Riccardo [2 ]
Antonelli, Alessandro [2 ]
Crivellaro, Simone [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Urol, 1200 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Univ Verona, Azienda Osped Univ Integrata, Dept Urol, Verona, Italy
[3] Rush Univ, Dept Urol, Chicago, IL USA
[4] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Urol Res Inst, Div Oncol, Unit Urol, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Pisa, Dept Translat Res & New Technol Med & Surg, Urol Unit, Pisa, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE | 2024年 / 67卷
关键词
Lymph node dissection; Robotic surgical procedures; Prostatectomy; Extraperitoneal; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; CANCER PATIENTS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; GUIDELINES; SURVIVAL; NOMOGRAM; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.euros.2024.07.110
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objective: The role of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for prostate cancer is still controversial. This study aims to compare the outcomes of PLND between extraperitoneal single-port (SP eRARP) and transperitoneal multi- port (MP tRARP) robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis from our single-center database for patients who underwent SP eRARP or MP tRARP with PLND between 2015 and 2023. The primary endpoint was to analyze and compare specific data related to PLND between the two populations by the detection of pN+ patients, the total number of lymph nodes removed, and the number of positive lymph nodes removed. The secondary endpoints included comparing major complications, lymphoceles, and biochemical recurrence between the two cohorts of the study. Key findings and limitations: A total of 293 patients were included, with 85 (29%) undergoing SP eRARP and 208 (71%) undergoing MP tRARP. SP eRARP showed significant differences in PLND extension from MP tRARP, while MP tRARP yielded more lymph nodes (p < 0.001). There were no differences in pN+ patient detection (p = 0.7) or the number of positive lymph nodes retrieved (p = 0.6). The rates of major complications (p = 0.6), lymphoceles (p = 0.2), and biochemical recurrence (p = 0.9) were similar between the two groups. Additionally, SP eRARP had shorter operative time (p = 0.045), hospital stay (p < 0.001), and less postoperative pain at discharge (p = 0.03). Limitations include a retrospective, single-center analysis. Conclusions and clinical implications: Despite the SP approach in RARP resulting in fewer retrieved lymph nodes, outcomes were comparable with the MP approach regarding the detection of patients with positive lymph nodes and the number of positive nodes. Additionally, the SP approach led to lower pain levels and shorter hospital stays. Patient summary: With this study, we demonstrate that pelvic lymph node dissection performed via the extraperitoneal approach during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with a single-port system provides comparable outcomes with the standard transperitoneal multiport approach in detecting patients with positive lymph nodes and retrieving positive nodes. In addition, it offers significantly reduced pain levels and shorter hospital stays. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creative- commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy for selected elderly bladder cancer patients: a single center experience
    Feng, Lang
    Song, Jian
    Wu, Menghua
    Tian, Ye
    Zhang, Daoxin
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2016, 42 (04): : 655 - 662
  • [32] Extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy: comparison between initial robotic experience of a high-volume open surgeon and his contemporary open series
    Roscigno, Marco
    La Croce, Giovanni
    Naspro, Richard
    Nicolai, Maria
    Manica, Michele
    Scarcello, Manuela
    Chinaglia, Daniela
    Pozzo, Luigi F.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (06) : 597 - 604
  • [33] Single Port Radical Prostatectomy as a Viable Option for Highly Complex Patients: A Single Center Experience
    Pettenuzzo, Greta
    Ditonno, Francesco
    Cannoletta, Donato
    Morgantini, Luca
    Sauer, Ruben Calvo
    Torres-Anguiano, Juan R.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    Veccia, Alessandro
    Antonelli, Alessandro
    Crivellaro, Simone
    UROLOGY, 2024, 189 : 55 - 63
  • [34] Efficacy and complications of single-port thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center experience
    Zheng, Fei
    Yang, Jun
    Zhang, Jiulong
    Li, Jiancheng
    Fang, Weimin
    Chen, Mingqiu
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [35] Comparison of Inversion ("flipping") Rates Among Different Port Designs: A Single-Center Experience
    Etezadi, Vahid
    Trerotola, Scott O.
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 40 (04) : 553 - 559
  • [36] Local and Lymph Node Relapse of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience
    Toumi, Nabil
    Ennouri, Sana
    Charfeddine, Ilhem
    Daoud, Jamel
    Khanfir, Afef
    ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2021, 100 (5_SUPPL) : 795S - 800S
  • [37] Embarking with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and dealing with the complications and collateral problems: A single-center experience
    Akdere, Hakan
    Aktoz, Tevfik
    Arikan, Mehmet Gurkan
    Atakan, Irfan Huseyin
    Veneziano, Domenico
    Gozen, Ali Serdar
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 46 (01): : 37 - 43
  • [38] Early complication of anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: Lessons from a single-center experience
    Heinzer, H
    Graefen, M
    Noldus, J
    Hammerer, P
    Huland, H
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1997, 59 (01) : 30 - 33
  • [39] Extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique: An effective assistant of extraperitoneal pure single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si surgical system
    Ju, Guanqun
    Wang, Zhijun
    Shi, Jiazi
    Xu, Weidong
    Zhang, Zongqin
    Yin, Lei
    Xu, Dongliang
    Ren, Shancheng
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [40] Comparison of Three Approaches to Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Our Institution's Initial Experience
    Balasubramanian, Shiva
    Shiang, Alexander
    Vetter, Joel M.
    Henning, Grant M.
    Figenshau, R. Sherburne
    Kim, Eric H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 (12) : 1551 - 1558