Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Comparison Among Extraperitoneal Single-port and Transperitoneal Multiport Radical Prostatectomy-A Single-center Experience

被引:1
|
作者
Pettenuzzo, Greta [1 ,2 ]
Ditonno, Francesco [2 ,3 ]
Cannoletta, Donato [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Pacini, Matteo [1 ,6 ]
Morgantini, Luca [1 ]
Sauer, Ruben Calvo [1 ]
Torres-Anguiano, Juan R. [1 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [4 ]
Briganti, Alberto [4 ]
Bartoletti, Riccardo [6 ]
Veccia, Alessandro [2 ]
Bertolo, Riccardo [2 ]
Antonelli, Alessandro [2 ]
Crivellaro, Simone [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Urol, 1200 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Univ Verona, Azienda Osped Univ Integrata, Dept Urol, Verona, Italy
[3] Rush Univ, Dept Urol, Chicago, IL USA
[4] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Urol Res Inst, Div Oncol, Unit Urol, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Pisa, Dept Translat Res & New Technol Med & Surg, Urol Unit, Pisa, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE | 2024年 / 67卷
关键词
Lymph node dissection; Robotic surgical procedures; Prostatectomy; Extraperitoneal; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; CANCER PATIENTS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; GUIDELINES; SURVIVAL; NOMOGRAM; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.euros.2024.07.110
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objective: The role of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for prostate cancer is still controversial. This study aims to compare the outcomes of PLND between extraperitoneal single-port (SP eRARP) and transperitoneal multi- port (MP tRARP) robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis from our single-center database for patients who underwent SP eRARP or MP tRARP with PLND between 2015 and 2023. The primary endpoint was to analyze and compare specific data related to PLND between the two populations by the detection of pN+ patients, the total number of lymph nodes removed, and the number of positive lymph nodes removed. The secondary endpoints included comparing major complications, lymphoceles, and biochemical recurrence between the two cohorts of the study. Key findings and limitations: A total of 293 patients were included, with 85 (29%) undergoing SP eRARP and 208 (71%) undergoing MP tRARP. SP eRARP showed significant differences in PLND extension from MP tRARP, while MP tRARP yielded more lymph nodes (p < 0.001). There were no differences in pN+ patient detection (p = 0.7) or the number of positive lymph nodes retrieved (p = 0.6). The rates of major complications (p = 0.6), lymphoceles (p = 0.2), and biochemical recurrence (p = 0.9) were similar between the two groups. Additionally, SP eRARP had shorter operative time (p = 0.045), hospital stay (p < 0.001), and less postoperative pain at discharge (p = 0.03). Limitations include a retrospective, single-center analysis. Conclusions and clinical implications: Despite the SP approach in RARP resulting in fewer retrieved lymph nodes, outcomes were comparable with the MP approach regarding the detection of patients with positive lymph nodes and the number of positive nodes. Additionally, the SP approach led to lower pain levels and shorter hospital stays. Patient summary: With this study, we demonstrate that pelvic lymph node dissection performed via the extraperitoneal approach during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with a single-port system provides comparable outcomes with the standard transperitoneal multiport approach in detecting patients with positive lymph nodes and retrieving positive nodes. In addition, it offers significantly reduced pain levels and shorter hospital stays. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creative- commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transvesical versus extraperitoneal single-port robotic radical prostatectomy: a matched-pair analysis
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Beksac, Alp Tuna
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Kaviani, Aaron
    Kaouk, Jihad
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (08) : 2001 - 2008
  • [22] Transvesical versus extraperitoneal single-port robotic radical prostatectomy: a matched-pair analysis
    Mahmoud Abou Zeinab
    Alp Tuna Beksac
    Ethan Ferguson
    Aaron Kaviani
    Jihad Kaouk
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 2001 - 2008
  • [23] Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Short-term outcomes and technique description
    Kwon, Hyeok Jae
    Kang, San
    Rhew, Seung Ah
    Yoon, Chang Eil
    Shin, Dongho
    Bang, Seokhwan
    Moon, Hyong Woo
    Bae, Woong Jin
    Cho, Hyuk Jin
    Ha, U-Syn
    Lee, Ji Youl
    Kim, Sae Woong
    Hong, Sung-Hoo
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2024, 65 (05) : 442 - 450
  • [24] Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-center experience beyond the learning curve
    Guillaume Ploussard
    Laurent Salomon
    Bastien Parier
    Claude Clément Abbou
    Alexandre de la Taille
    World Journal of Urology, 2013, 31 : 447 - 453
  • [25] Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-center experience beyond the learning curve
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Salomon, Laurent
    Parier, Bastien
    Abbou, Claude Clement
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (03) : 447 - 453
  • [26] Assessment of Lymph Node Yield After Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Comparison Between Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy in the Modern Era
    Truesdale, Matthew D.
    Lee, Daniel J.
    Cheetham, Philippa J.
    Hruby, Gregory W.
    Turk, Andrew T.
    Badani, Ketan K.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (07) : 1055 - 1060
  • [27] Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestration
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Wasserscheid, Johanna
    Rabenalt, Robert
    Do, Minh
    Schwalenberg, Thilo
    McNeill, Alan
    Constantinides, Costantinos
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Ganzer, Roman
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 26 (06) : 581 - 586
  • [28] Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestration
    Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
    Johanna Wasserscheid
    Robert Rabenalt
    Minh Do
    Thilo Schwalenberg
    Alan McNeill
    Costantinos Constantinides
    Panagiotis Kallidonis
    Roman Ganzer
    Evangelos Liatsikos
    World Journal of Urology, 2008, 26
  • [29] Pure Single-site Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using Single-port Versus Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single-institution Comparative Study
    Lenfant, Louis
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Kim, Soodong
    Wilson, Clark A.
    Beksac, Alp T.
    Schwen, Zeyad
    Kaouk, Jihad
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (05): : 964 - 972
  • [30] Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review
    Kim, Min Chul
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2021, 37 (06) : 382 - 394