Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Comparison Among Extraperitoneal Single-port and Transperitoneal Multiport Radical Prostatectomy-A Single-center Experience

被引:1
|
作者
Pettenuzzo, Greta [1 ,2 ]
Ditonno, Francesco [2 ,3 ]
Cannoletta, Donato [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Pacini, Matteo [1 ,6 ]
Morgantini, Luca [1 ]
Sauer, Ruben Calvo [1 ]
Torres-Anguiano, Juan R. [1 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [4 ]
Briganti, Alberto [4 ]
Bartoletti, Riccardo [6 ]
Veccia, Alessandro [2 ]
Bertolo, Riccardo [2 ]
Antonelli, Alessandro [2 ]
Crivellaro, Simone [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Urol, 1200 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Univ Verona, Azienda Osped Univ Integrata, Dept Urol, Verona, Italy
[3] Rush Univ, Dept Urol, Chicago, IL USA
[4] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Urol Res Inst, Div Oncol, Unit Urol, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Pisa, Dept Translat Res & New Technol Med & Surg, Urol Unit, Pisa, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE | 2024年 / 67卷
关键词
Lymph node dissection; Robotic surgical procedures; Prostatectomy; Extraperitoneal; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; CANCER PATIENTS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; GUIDELINES; SURVIVAL; NOMOGRAM; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.euros.2024.07.110
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objective: The role of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for prostate cancer is still controversial. This study aims to compare the outcomes of PLND between extraperitoneal single-port (SP eRARP) and transperitoneal multi- port (MP tRARP) robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis from our single-center database for patients who underwent SP eRARP or MP tRARP with PLND between 2015 and 2023. The primary endpoint was to analyze and compare specific data related to PLND between the two populations by the detection of pN+ patients, the total number of lymph nodes removed, and the number of positive lymph nodes removed. The secondary endpoints included comparing major complications, lymphoceles, and biochemical recurrence between the two cohorts of the study. Key findings and limitations: A total of 293 patients were included, with 85 (29%) undergoing SP eRARP and 208 (71%) undergoing MP tRARP. SP eRARP showed significant differences in PLND extension from MP tRARP, while MP tRARP yielded more lymph nodes (p < 0.001). There were no differences in pN+ patient detection (p = 0.7) or the number of positive lymph nodes retrieved (p = 0.6). The rates of major complications (p = 0.6), lymphoceles (p = 0.2), and biochemical recurrence (p = 0.9) were similar between the two groups. Additionally, SP eRARP had shorter operative time (p = 0.045), hospital stay (p < 0.001), and less postoperative pain at discharge (p = 0.03). Limitations include a retrospective, single-center analysis. Conclusions and clinical implications: Despite the SP approach in RARP resulting in fewer retrieved lymph nodes, outcomes were comparable with the MP approach regarding the detection of patients with positive lymph nodes and the number of positive nodes. Additionally, the SP approach led to lower pain levels and shorter hospital stays. Patient summary: With this study, we demonstrate that pelvic lymph node dissection performed via the extraperitoneal approach during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with a single-port system provides comparable outcomes with the standard transperitoneal multiport approach in detecting patients with positive lymph nodes and retrieving positive nodes. In addition, it offers significantly reduced pain levels and shorter hospital stays. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creative- commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Development of symptomatic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection is independent of surgical approach: a single-center analysis
    Christian Thomas
    Stefanie Ziewers
    Anita Thomas
    Robert Dotzauer
    Georg Bartsch
    Axel Haferkamp
    Igor Tsaur
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2019, 51 : 633 - 640
  • [12] Technical advancements in robotic prostatectomy: single-port extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and single-port transperineal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Wilson, Clark A.
    Garisto, Juan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 848 - 855
  • [13] Extraperitoneal versus Transperitoneal Single Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes
    Chen, I-Hsuan Alan
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (06) : 1140 - 1140
  • [14] Single-institution Cost Comparison: Single-port Versus Multiport Robotic Prostatectomy
    Lenfant, Louis
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Kim, Soodong
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Kaouk, Jihad
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (03): : 532 - 536
  • [15] Robotic salvage pelvic lymph node dissection for locoregional recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience
    Hopland, Olav Andreas
    Fossa, Sophie D.
    Ottosson, Fredrik
    Brennhovd, Bjorn
    Svindland, Aud
    Hole, Knut Hakon
    Hernes, Eivor
    Eri, Lars Magne
    Diep, Lien My
    Berge, Viktor
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 55 (04) : 287 - 292
  • [16] Initial Experience with Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and Conventional Multiport Approaches
    Gross, James T.
    Vetter, Joel M.
    Sands, Kenneth G.
    Palka, Joshua K.
    Bhayani, Sam B.
    Figenshau, Robert S.
    Kim, Eric H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 (08) : 1177 - 1183
  • [17] Propensity-Score Matched Analysis Between Extraperitoneal Single Port and Intraperitoneal Multiport Radical Prostatectomy: A Single-Institutional Experience
    Harrison, Robert
    Stifelman, Michael
    Billah, Mubashir
    Zaifman, Jay
    Lulla, Tina
    De la Rosa, Ruth Sanchez
    Koster, Helaine
    Lovallo, Gregory
    Ahmed, Mutahar
    UROLOGY, 2022, 165 : 198 - 204
  • [18] Single-port and multiport robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis
    Nguyen, Tuan Thanh
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    Vuong, Huy Gia
    Quy, Khoa
    Ngo, Hanh Thi Tuyet
    Mai, Anh Tuan
    Tuyet, Mai Tran Thi
    Thai, Minh Sam
    Tiong, Ho Yee
    Choi, Se Young
    Shahait, Mohammed
    Lee, David I.
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 11 (04) : 187 - 194
  • [19] In Favor of Extraperitoneal Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Back to the Future Through a Single-Port Approach
    Crivellaro, Simone
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 (08) : 1121 - 1122
  • [20] Identifying the Candidates Who Will Benefit From Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Prostatectomy Among Patients With Prostate Cancer
    Yang, Guanjie
    Xie, Jun
    Guo, Yadong
    Yuan, Jing
    Wang, Ruiliang
    Guo, Changcheng
    Peng, Bo
    Yao, Xudong
    Yang, Bin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11