Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Comparison Among Extraperitoneal Single-port and Transperitoneal Multiport Radical Prostatectomy-A Single-center Experience

被引:1
|
作者
Pettenuzzo, Greta [1 ,2 ]
Ditonno, Francesco [2 ,3 ]
Cannoletta, Donato [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Pacini, Matteo [1 ,6 ]
Morgantini, Luca [1 ]
Sauer, Ruben Calvo [1 ]
Torres-Anguiano, Juan R. [1 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [4 ]
Briganti, Alberto [4 ]
Bartoletti, Riccardo [6 ]
Veccia, Alessandro [2 ]
Bertolo, Riccardo [2 ]
Antonelli, Alessandro [2 ]
Crivellaro, Simone [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Urol, 1200 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Univ Verona, Azienda Osped Univ Integrata, Dept Urol, Verona, Italy
[3] Rush Univ, Dept Urol, Chicago, IL USA
[4] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Urol Res Inst, Div Oncol, Unit Urol, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Pisa, Dept Translat Res & New Technol Med & Surg, Urol Unit, Pisa, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE | 2024年 / 67卷
关键词
Lymph node dissection; Robotic surgical procedures; Prostatectomy; Extraperitoneal; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; CANCER PATIENTS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; GUIDELINES; SURVIVAL; NOMOGRAM; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.euros.2024.07.110
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objective: The role of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for prostate cancer is still controversial. This study aims to compare the outcomes of PLND between extraperitoneal single-port (SP eRARP) and transperitoneal multi- port (MP tRARP) robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis from our single-center database for patients who underwent SP eRARP or MP tRARP with PLND between 2015 and 2023. The primary endpoint was to analyze and compare specific data related to PLND between the two populations by the detection of pN+ patients, the total number of lymph nodes removed, and the number of positive lymph nodes removed. The secondary endpoints included comparing major complications, lymphoceles, and biochemical recurrence between the two cohorts of the study. Key findings and limitations: A total of 293 patients were included, with 85 (29%) undergoing SP eRARP and 208 (71%) undergoing MP tRARP. SP eRARP showed significant differences in PLND extension from MP tRARP, while MP tRARP yielded more lymph nodes (p < 0.001). There were no differences in pN+ patient detection (p = 0.7) or the number of positive lymph nodes retrieved (p = 0.6). The rates of major complications (p = 0.6), lymphoceles (p = 0.2), and biochemical recurrence (p = 0.9) were similar between the two groups. Additionally, SP eRARP had shorter operative time (p = 0.045), hospital stay (p < 0.001), and less postoperative pain at discharge (p = 0.03). Limitations include a retrospective, single-center analysis. Conclusions and clinical implications: Despite the SP approach in RARP resulting in fewer retrieved lymph nodes, outcomes were comparable with the MP approach regarding the detection of patients with positive lymph nodes and the number of positive nodes. Additionally, the SP approach led to lower pain levels and shorter hospital stays. Patient summary: With this study, we demonstrate that pelvic lymph node dissection performed via the extraperitoneal approach during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with a single-port system provides comparable outcomes with the standard transperitoneal multiport approach in detecting patients with positive lymph nodes and retrieving positive nodes. In addition, it offers significantly reduced pain levels and shorter hospital stays. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creative- commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Extraperitoneal and Transperitoneal Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy
    Mullins, Jeffrey K.
    Hyndman, M. Eric
    Mettee, Lynda Z.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (12) : 1883 - 1887
  • [2] Development of symptomatic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection is independent of surgical approach: a single-center analysis
    Thomas, Christian
    Ziewers, Stefanie
    Thomas, Anita
    Dotzauer, Robert
    Bartsch, Georg
    Haferkamp, Axel
    Tsaur, Igor
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 51 (04) : 633 - 640
  • [3] Extraperitoneal Single Port vs Transperitoneal Multiport Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in frail patients: A propensity score matched comparative analysis
    Lambertini, Luca
    Pacini, Matteo
    Calvo, Ruben Sauer
    Morgantini, Luca
    Cannoletta, Donato
    Di Maida, Fabrizio
    Valastro, Francesca
    Mari, Andrea
    Bignante, Gabriele
    Lasorsa, Francesco
    Orsini, Angelo
    Zucchi, Alessandro
    Minervini, Andrea
    Crivellaro, Simone
    EJSO, 2024, 50 (12):
  • [4] Single-center experience of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection
    Boga, Mehmet Salih
    Ozsoy, Cagatay
    Aktas, Yasin
    Aydin, Arif
    Savas, Murat
    Ates, Mutlu
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 46 (04): : 288 - 296
  • [5] Extraperitoneal Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Khalil, Mahmoud I.
    Joseph, Jean V.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 : S100 - S105
  • [6] Is a Drain Needed After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection? Results of a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial
    Porcaro, Antonio B.
    Siracusano, Salvatore
    Bizzotto, Leonardo
    Sebben, Marco
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    de Luyk, Nicolo
    Corsi, Paolo
    Tafuri, Alessandro
    Processali, Tania
    Mattevi, Daniele
    Cerruto, Maria A.
    Brunelli, Matteo
    Novella, Giovanni
    De Marco, Vincenzo
    Artibani, Walter
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 (06) : 922 - 928
  • [7] A comparison of perioperative outcomes between extraperitoneal robotic single-port and multiport radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si Surgical System
    Ju, Guan-Qun
    Wang, Zhi-Jun
    Shi, Jia-Zi
    Zhang, Zong-Qin
    Wu, Zhen-Jie
    Yin, Lei
    Liu, Bing
    Wang, Lin-Hui
    Xu, Dong-Liang
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2021, 23 (06) : 640 - +
  • [8] Perioperative Complications of Single-Port and Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single-Institutional Comparison Analysis
    Soputro, Nicolas A.
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Mikesell, Carter
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2024, 38 (05) : 450 - 457
  • [9] Transition from a multiport technique to a single-port technique for lung cancer surgery: is lymph node dissection inferior using the single-port technique?
    Liu, Chia-Chuan
    Shih, Chih-Shiun
    Pennarun, Nicolas
    Cheng, Chih-Tao
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 49 : 64 - 72
  • [10] Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Versus Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Approaches for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy
    Yildiz, Ali
    Anil, Hakan
    Akdemir, Serkan
    Aksaray, Eren Erdi
    Ates, Mutlu
    Arslan, Murat
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 32 (04): : 355 - 359