Monitoring the Wake of Low Reynolds Number Airfoils for Their Aerodynamic Loads Assessment

被引:1
作者
Verma, A. [1 ]
Kulkarni, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Guwahati, Dept Mech Engn, Gauhati 781039, Assam, India
关键词
Wind tunnel measurement; Low Reynolds number; S5010 and E214 airfoils; Aerodynamic characteristics; Vortex shedding frequency; Strouhal number; ASPECT-RATIO; SEPARATION; WINGS;
D O I
10.47176/jafm.17.11.2607
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Experimental investigations are carried out to explore the aerodynamic performance and vortex shedding characteristics of S5010 and E214 airfoilbased wings to provide guidance for the design of MAVs and other low-speed vehicles. Force and wake shedding frequency measurements are carried out in a subsonic wind tunnel in the Reynolds number (Re) range of 4 x 104 - 1 x 105. The measurements with increasing Re show that the slope of the lift curve in the linear region increases by 14% for S5010, while this increment is 11% for E214. The peak lift coefficient of both airfoils reduces with reducing Re. For lower pitch angles, the influence of Re on drag coefficients is less significant, but at higher angles, the drag increases as the Re drops. Unlike pre-stall mountings, the pitch-down propensity of the airfoil enhances in the post-stall region for high Re flows. Moreover, the frequency of shed vortices reduces with rising angle of attack at a given Re. In contrast, the Strouhal number almost remains constant with varying Re at a fixed angle of attack. For S5010 and E214 airfoils, the Strouhal number is noticed to vary between 0.68 - 0.36 and 0.58 - 0.36, respectively, for pitch angle variation of 12 degrees- 28 degrees. The airfoils show a higher Strouhal number than the bluff body wakes, but this difference decreases for high angles of attack mountings. This finding reveals that the wake structure of the airfoil at a high post-stall angle behaves as bluff body wakes.
引用
收藏
页码:2481 / 2498
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ananda G. K., 2012, PROC 30 AIAA APPL AE, DOI [10.2514/6.2012-3026, DOI 10.2514/6.2012-3026]
  • [2] Anderson J., 2011, Fundamentals of aerodynamics
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1998, Flight stability and automatic control
  • [4] Bai P., 2016, 46 AIAA FLUID DYN C, DOI [10.2514/6.2016-4337, DOI 10.2514/6.2016-4337]
  • [5] BOUNDARY-LAYER MEASUREMENTS ON AN AIRFOIL AT LOW REYNOLDS-NUMBERS
    BRENDEL, M
    MUELLER, TJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1988, 25 (07): : 612 - 617
  • [6] Bruun H., 1995, Hot-Wire Anemometry: Principles and Signal Analysis
  • [7] Carmichael B., 1981, NASA CONTRACTOR REPO, VI
  • [8] Strouhal numbers of inclined flat plates
    Chen, JM
    Fang, YC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1996, 61 (2-3) : 99 - 112
  • [9] Gerakopulos R., 2010, 40 FLUID DYN C EXH C, P4629, DOI [10.2514/6.2010-4629, DOI 10.2514/6.2010-4629]
  • [10] Near wake behind an airfoil with leading-edge flow control
    Gerontakos, P
    Lee, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2005, 42 (02): : 561 - 568