A prediction model based on deep learning and radiomics features of DWI for the assessment of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer

被引:2
作者
Wang, Jing [1 ]
Song, Pujiao [1 ]
Zhang, Meng [2 ]
Liu, Wei [1 ]
Zeng, Xi [1 ]
Chen, Nanshan [1 ]
Li, Yuxia [2 ]
Wang, Minghua [1 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Med Univ, Dept Nucl Med, Affiliated Hosp, 28 Guiyi St, Guiyang 550004, Peoples R China
[2] Xinxiang Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Magnet Resonance Imaging, Xinxiang, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2024年 / 13卷 / 16期
关键词
deep learning; diffusion-weighted imaging; endometrial cancer; microsatellite instability; radiomics;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.70046
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To explore the efficacy of a prediction model based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) features extracted from deep learning (DL) and radiomics combined with clinical parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values to identify microsatellite instability (MSI) in endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: This study included a cohort of 116 patients with EC, who were subsequently divided into training (n = 81) and test (n = 35) sets. From DWI, conventional radiomics features and convolutional neural network-based DL features were extracted. Random forest (RF) and logistic regression were adopted as classifiers. DL features, radiomics features, clinical variables, ADC values, and their combinations were applied to establish DL, radiomics, clinical, ADC, and combined models, respectively. The predictive performance was evaluated through the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), total integrated discrimination index (IDI), net reclassification index (NRI), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The optimal predictive model, based on an RF classifier, comprised four DL features, three radiomics features, two clinical variables, and an ADC value. In the training and test sets, this model exhibited AUC values of 0.989 (95% CI: 0.935-1.000) and 0.885 (95% CI: 0.731-0.967), respectively, demonstrating different degrees of improvement compared with the clinical, DL, radiomics, and ADC models (AUC-training = 0.671, 0.873, 0.833, and 0.814, AUC-test = 0.685, 0.783, 0.708, and 0.713, respectively). The NRI and IDI analyses revealed that the combined model resulted in improved risk reclassification of the MSI status compared to the clinical, radiomics, DL, and ADC models. The calibration curves and DCA indicated good consistency and clinical utility of this model, respectively. Conclusions: The predictive model based on DWI features extracted from DL and radiomics combined with clinical parameters and ADC values could effectively assess the MSI status in EC.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability status: development and validation of a pan-cancer PET/CT-based radiomics model
    Wang, Menglu
    Peng, Mengye
    Yang, Xinyue
    Zhang, Ying
    Wu, Tingting
    Wang, Zeyu
    Wang, Kezheng
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 45 (05) : 372 - 380
  • [42] CT-based deep learning segmentation of ovarian cancer and the stability of the extracted radiomics features
    Wang, Yiang
    Wang, Mandi
    Cao, Peng
    Wong, Esther M. F.
    Ho, Grace
    Lam, Tina P. W.
    Han, Lujun
    Lee, Elaine Y. P.
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2023, 13 (08) : 5218 - 5229
  • [43] Intratumoral and peritumoral CT-based radiomics for predicting the microsatellite instability in gastric cancer
    Chen, Xingchi
    Zhuang, Zijian
    Pen, Lin
    Xue, Jing
    Zhu, Haitao
    Zhang, Lirong
    Wang, Dongqing
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (05) : 1363 - 1375
  • [44] Multi-sequence MRI-based clinical-radiomics models for the preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability-high status in endometrial cancer
    Li, Zhuang
    Su, Yi
    Cui, Yongbin
    Yin, Yong
    Li, Zhenjiang
    PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2025,
  • [45] Identifying Prognostic Markers From Clinical, Radiomics, and Deep Learning Imaging Features for Gastric Cancer Survival Prediction
    Hao, Degan
    Li, Qiong
    Feng, Qiu-Xia
    Qi, Liang
    Liu, Xi-Sheng
    Arefan, Dooman
    Zhang, Yu-Dong
    Wu, Shandong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
  • [46] Head and neck cancer treatment outcome prediction: a comparison between machine learning with conventional radiomics features and deep learning radiomics( vol 10 , 1217037 , 2023)
    Huynh, Bao Ngoc
    Groendahl, Aurora Rosvoll
    Tomic, Oliver
    Liland, Kristian Hovde
    Knudtsen, Ingerid Skjei
    Hoebers, Frank
    van Elmpt, Wouter
    Malinen, Eirik
    Dale, Einar
    Futsaether, Cecilia Marie
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [47] T2WI and ADC radiomics combined with a nomogram based on clinicopathologic features to quantitatively predict microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer
    Peng, Leping
    Zhang, Xiuling
    Zhu, Yuanhui
    Shi, Liuyan
    Ai, Kai
    Huang, Gang
    Ma, Wenting
    Wei, Zhaokun
    Wang, Ling
    Ma, Yaqiong
    Wang, Lili
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2025, 32 (03) : 1431 - 1450
  • [48] Preoperative clinical radiomics model based on deep learning in prognostic assessment of patients with gallbladder carcinoma
    Jin, Zhechuan
    Chen, Chen
    Zhang, Dong
    Yang, Min
    Wang, Qiuping
    Cai, Zhiqiang
    Si, Shubin
    Geng, Zhimin
    Li, Qi
    BMC CANCER, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [49] Deep learning for fully automated tumor segmentation and extraction of magnetic resonance radiomics features in cervical cancer
    Yu-Chun Lin
    Chia-Hung Lin
    Hsin-Ying Lu
    Hsin-Ju Chiang
    Ho-Kai Wang
    Yu-Ting Huang
    Shu-Hang Ng
    Ji-Hong Hong
    Tzu-Chen Yen
    Chyong-Huey Lai
    Gigin Lin
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 1297 - 1305
  • [50] Deep learning for fully automated tumor segmentation and extraction of magnetic resonance radiomics features in cervical cancer
    Lin, Yu-Chun
    Lin, Chia-Hung
    Lu, Hsin-Ying
    Chiang, Hsin-Ju
    Wang, Ho-Kai
    Huang, Yu-Ting
    Ng, Shu-Hang
    Hong, Ji-Hong
    Yen, Tzu-Chen
    Lai, Chyong-Huey
    Lin, Gigin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (03) : 1297 - 1305