Accuracy of Mothers' Perception of Birth Size to Predict Birth Weight Data in Bangladesh

被引:0
作者
Khan, Jahidur Rahman [1 ]
Bakar, K. Shuvo [2 ]
Awan, Nabil [3 ]
Muurlink, Olav [4 ]
Homaira, Nusrat [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Clin Med, Discipline Paediat, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Stat, Madison, WI USA
[4] Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Business & Law, Brisbane, Australia
[5] BRAC Univ, James P Grant Sch Publ Hlth, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
Birth size; Birth weight; Agreement; Bangladesh; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-024-03975-7
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe prevalence of low birth weight (LBW) is an important indicator of child health and wellbeing. However, in many countries, decisions regarding care and treatment are often based on mothers' perceptions of their children's birth size due to a lack of objective birth weight data. Additionally, birth weight data that is self-reported or recorded often encounters the issue of heaping. This study assesses the concordance between the perceived birth size and the reported or recorded birth weight. We also investigate how the presence of heaped birth weight data affects this concordance, as well as the relationship between concordance and various sociodemographic factors.MethodsWe examined 4,641 birth records reported in the 2019 Bangladesh Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey. The sensitivity-specificity analysis was performed to assess perceived birth size's ability to predict LBW, while Cohen's Kappa statistic assessed reliability. We used the kernel smoothing technique to correct heaping of birth weight data, as well as a multivariable multinomial logistic model to assess factors associated with concordance.ResultsMaternally-perceived birth size exhibited a low sensitivity (63.5%) and positive predictive value (52.6%) for predicting LBW, but a high specificity (90.1%) and negative predictive value (93.4%). There was 86.1% agreement between birth size and birth weight-based classifications (Kappa = 0.49, indicating moderate agreement). Smoothed birth weight data did not improve agreement (83.4%, Kappa = 0.45). Of the sociodemographic factors, early marriage was positively associated with discordance (i.e., overestimation).ConclusionsAn important consideration when calculating the LBW prevalence is that maternally perceived birth size is not an optimal proxy for birth weight. Focus should be placed on encouraging institutional births and educating community health workers and young mothers about the significance of measuring and recording birth weight. Maternally-perceived birth size has been used to determine the LBW prevalence in many countries, including Bangladesh, where many or most births occur at home and birth weight data are not routinely collected. Research in Bangladesh has not investigated the value of perceived birth size in predicting birth weight, and earlier research in different countries has yielded inconsistent results. This study demonstrates that maternal perception of birth size has limited LBW prediction accuracy in Bangladesh. Consequently, it is imperative to exercise caution when estimating the prevalence of LBW based on data on perceived birth size, as LBW is a critical indicator of health outcomes and informs policy and interventions at both individual and national levels.
引用
收藏
页码:1677 / 1684
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nutritional Status of Mothers and Low Birth Weight in India
    Dharmalingam, A.
    Navaneetham, K.
    Krishnakumar, C. S.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2010, 14 (02) : 290 - 298
  • [2] Arsenic Exposure During Pregnancy and Size at Birth: A Prospective Cohort Study in Bangladesh
    Rahman, Anisur
    Vahter, Marie
    Smith, Allan H.
    Nermell, Barbro
    Yunus, Mohammed
    El Arifeen, Shams
    Persson, Lars-Ake
    Ekstrom, Eva-Charlotte
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 169 (03) : 304 - 312
  • [3] Infant Birth Weight and Maltreatment of Adolescent Mothers
    Cederbaum, Julie A.
    Putnam-Hornstein, Emily
    King, Bryn
    Gilbert, Kaycee
    Needell, Barbara
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 45 (02) : 197 - 201
  • [4] The effect of mothers' socioeconomic status to birth weight
    Cambaz, N.
    Koca, D.
    Demirdoven, M.
    Gursoy, T.
    Mayer, I.
    Akkar, I.
    Ovali, F.
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2008, 97 : 115 - 116
  • [5] Housing Instability and Birth Weight among Young Urban Mothers
    Carrion, Bianca V.
    Earnshaw, Valerie A.
    Kershaw, Trace
    Lewis, Jessica B.
    Stasko, Emily C.
    Tobin, Jonathan N.
    Ickovics, Jeannette R.
    JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, 2015, 92 (01): : 1 - 9
  • [6] Predictive accuracy of perceived baby birth size for birth weight: a cross-sectional study from the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey
    Nigatu, Dabere
    Haile, Demewoz
    Gebremichael, Bereket
    Tiruneh, Yordanos M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12):
  • [7] Size at birth and coronary artery disease in a population with high birth weight
    Gunnarsdottir, I
    Birgisdottir, BE
    Thorsdottir, I
    Gudnason, V
    Benediktsson, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2002, 76 (06) : 1290 - 1294
  • [8] RISK FACTORS OF PRETERM BIRTH AND LOW BIRTH WEIGHT NEONATES AMONG ROMA AND NON-ROMA MOTHERS
    Diabelkova, Jana
    Rimarova, Kvetoslava
    Urdzik, Peter
    Dorko, Erik
    Busova, Andrea
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 26 : S25 - S31
  • [9] Birth weight, prematurity and accuracy of gestational age
    Mongelli, M
    Gardosi, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1997, 56 (03) : 251 - 256
  • [10] Predictive factors for birth weight of newborns of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus
    Correa da Silva, Sara de Oliveira
    Saunders, Claudia
    Zajdenverg, Lenita
    Moreira, Luciana Novaes
    Heidelmann, Sonaly Petronilho
    dos Santos Pereira, Ariane Cristine
    Padilha, Patricia de Carvalho
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 138 : 262 - 270