Economic evaluation of lifestyle interventions in infertility management: A systematic review

被引:1
作者
Untaaveesup, Suvijak [1 ,2 ]
Chongthanadon, Brandon [2 ]
Kositamongkol, Chayanis [3 ]
Phisalprapa, Pochamana [3 ]
Panyakhamlerd, Krasean [4 ]
Titapant, Vitaya [5 ]
机构
[1] Phaholpolpayuhasena Hosp, Kanchanaburi, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Siriraj Hosp, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med, Div Ambulatory Med,Siriraj Hosp, Bangkok, Thailand
[4] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bangkok, Thailand
[5] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bangkok, Thailand
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 08期
关键词
FECUNDABILITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0306419
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Infertility, a global concern affecting both sexes, is influenced by modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. While the literature predominantly underscores the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle interventions in the realm of infertility treatment, a holistic compilation analysing the economic dimensions of such interventions is lacking. This systematic review aimed to fill this gap by evaluating the economic facets of lifestyle interventions in the management of infertility.Methods An exhaustive search was conducted within the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from their inception to February 2024. The aim was to find articles related to the economic aspects of lifestyle interventions in infertility management. These included clinical studies covering economic outcomes and economic evaluations. The Drummond Checklist was used to assess the quality of the included studies.Results From an initial yield of 7555 articles, five studies were deemed eligible for inclusion, comprising three cost-effectiveness analyses, one prospective cohort study and a randomized controlled trial, all of which were undertaken in high-income countries (the Netherlands, Australia and Japan). These studies included patients receiving infertility treatments for conditions such as unexplained infertility, polycystic ovary syndrome, ovulation disorders, or mild male infertility, inclusive of individuals with and without obesity. The women who participated in these studies were up to 45 years of age. The findings suggested that integrating lifestyle intervention programmes tends to enhance pregnancy and live birth outcomes. These programmes encompass coaching, psychological or behavioural guidance, nutritional adjustments, exercise regimes, weight management, smoking cessation and mindfulness techniques. Moreover, these interventions are likely to be more cost-effective than standard infertility care.Conclusion For couples embarking on infertility treatments, the integration of lifestyle interventions into their management strategy not only fosters clinical benefits but also represents a cost-effective alternative to conventional care, particularly within high-income settings.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2023, Infertility Prevalence Estimates, 1990-2021
  • [2] The economic burden of infertility treatment and distribution of expenditures overtime in France: a self-controlled pre-post study
    Bourrion, B.
    Panjo, H.
    Bithorel, P-L
    de la Rochebrochard, E.
    Francois, M.
    Pelletier-Fleury, N.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [3] Drummond M., 2015, Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, V4th edn
  • [4] Effects of lifestyle factors on fertility: practical recommendations for modification
    Emokpae, Mathias Abiodun
    Brown, Somieye Imaobong
    [J]. REPRODUCTION AND FERTILITY, 2021, 2 (01): : R13 - R26
  • [5] Caffeinated Beverage and Soda Consumption and Time to Pregnancy
    Hatch, Elizabeth E.
    Wise, Lauren A.
    Mikkelsen, Ellen M.
    Christensen, Tina
    Riis, Anders H.
    Sorensen, Henrik Toft
    Rothman, Kenneth J.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (03) : 393 - 401
  • [6] The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: a review
    Homan, G. F.
    Davies, M.
    Norman, R. J.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2007, 13 (03) : 209 - 223
  • [7] Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century
    Inhorn, Marcia C.
    Patrizio, Pasquale
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2015, 21 (04) : 411 - 426
  • [8] Liberati A, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V339, DOI [10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.i4086]
  • [9] National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence Since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of 277 Health Surveys
    Mascarenhas, Maya N.
    Flaxman, Seth R.
    Boerma, Ties
    Vanderpoel, Sheryl
    Stevens, Gretchen A.
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (12)
  • [10] Body mass index, physical activity and fecundability in a North American preconception cohort study
    McKinnon, Craig J.
    Hatch, Elizabeth E.
    Rothman, Kenneth J.
    Mikkelsen, Ellen M.
    Wesselink, Amelia K.
    Hahn, Kristen A.
    Wise, Lauren A.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (02) : 451 - 459