Systemic Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Among Periprosthetic Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:2
|
作者
Seward, Michael W. [1 ]
Hannon, Charles P. [1 ]
Yuan, Brandon J. [1 ]
Kearns, Ann E. [2 ]
Anderson, Paul A. [3 ]
Berry, Daniel J. [1 ]
Abdel, Matthew P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Endocrinol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Orthoped & Rehabil, Madison, WI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
osteoporosis; total hip arthroplasty; periprosthetic fractures; metabolic bone diseases; bone mineral density; PRIOR FRAGILITY FRACTURES; RISK-FACTORS; FEMORAL FRACTURES; MANAGEMENT; FEMUR; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ASSOCIATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.002
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Most periprosthetic fractures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are fragility fractures that qualify patients for osteoporosis diagnoses. However, it remains unknown how many patients were diagnosed who had osteoporosis before injury or received the proper evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment after injury. Methods: We identified 171 Vancouver B2 (109) and B3 (62) periprosthetic femur fractures treated with a modular fluted tapered stem from 2000 to 2018 at 1 institution. The mean patient age was 75 years (range, 35 to 94), 50% were women, and the mean body mass index was 29 (range, 17 to 60). We identified patients who had osteoporosis or osteopenia diagnoses, a fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), bone mineral density (BMD) testing, an endocrinology consult, and osteoporosis medications. Age- appropriate BMD testing was defined as no later than 1 year after the recommended ages of 65 (women) or 70 years (men). The mean follow-up was 11 years (range, 4 to 21). Results: Falls from standing height caused 94% of fractures and thus, by definition, qualified as osteoporosis-defining events. The prevalence of osteoporosis diagnosis increased from 20% before periprosthetic fracture to 39% after (P < .001). The prevalence of osteopenia diagnosis increased from 13% before the fracture to 24% after (P < .001). The prevalence of either diagnosis increased from 24% before fracture to 44% after (P < .001). No patients had documented FRAX scores before fracture, and only 2% had scores after. The prevalence of BMD testing was 21% before fracture and 22% after (P = .88). By the end of the final follow-up, only 16% had received age-appropriate BMD testing. The proportion of patients who had endocrinology consults increased from 6% before the fracture to 25% after (P < .001). The proportion on bisphosphonate therapy was 19% before fracture and 25% after (P = .08). Conclusions: Although most periprosthetic fractures following THA are fragility fractures that qualify patients for osteoporosis diagnoses, there remain major gaps in diagnosis, screening, endocrinology follow-up, and treatment. Like nonarthroplasty fragility fractures, a systematic approach is needed after periprosthetic fractures. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:2621 / 2626
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    Cottino, Umberto
    Mabry, Tad M.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (10) : 2005 - 2010
  • [32] Impaction bone grafting for periprosthetic fractures around a total hip arthroplasty
    Youssef, Bishoy
    Pavlou, George
    Shah, Nikhil
    Macheras, George
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2014, 45 (11): : 1674 - 1680
  • [33] Periprosthetic Femur Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does the Mode of Failure Correlate With Classification?
    Gausden, Elizabeth B.
    Beiene, Zodina A.
    Blevins, Jason L.
    Christ, Alexander B.
    Chalmers, Brian P.
    Helfet, David L.
    Sculco, Peter K.
    Mayman, David J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (07) : 2597 - 2602
  • [34] Preoperative Malnutrition and Metabolic Markers May Predict Periprosthetic Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Lung, Brandon E.
    Donnelly, Megan
    Callan, Kylie
    Mclellan, Maddison
    Amirhekmat, Arya
    McMaster, William C.
    So, David H.
    Yang, Steven
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2023, 19
  • [35] Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review
    Matthew P. Abdel
    Umberto Cottino
    Tad M. Mabry
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 2005 - 2010
  • [36] Total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoporosis
    Karachalios, Theofilos S.
    Koutalos, Antonios A.
    Komnos, George A.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 30 (04) : 370 - 379
  • [37] What Are the Preoperative Outcome Measures That Predispose to Periprosthetic Fractures After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?
    Lim, Jason Beng Teck
    Bin Abd Razak, Hamid Rahmatullah
    Zainul-Abidin, Suraya
    Allen, John Carson
    Koh, Joyce Suang Bee
    Sen Howe, Tet
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (08) : 2531 - 2534
  • [38] Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Deng, Yi
    Kieser, David
    Wyatt, Michael
    Stringer, Mark
    Frampton, Christopher
    Hooper, Gary
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 90 (04) : 441 - 447
  • [39] Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: results of an online survey of the European Hip Society
    Thaler, Martin
    Weiss, Carmen
    Lechner, Ricarda
    Epinette, Jean-Alain
    Karachalios, Theofilos S.
    Zagra, Luigi
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 33 (01) : 126 - 132
  • [40] Management and Outcome of Periprosthetic Fractures After Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Platzer, Patrick
    Schuster, Rupert
    Aldrian, Silke
    Prosquill, Stella
    Krumboeck, Anna
    Zehetgruber, Isabella
    Kovar, Florian
    Schwameis, Katrin
    Vecsei, Vilmos
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 68 (06): : 1464 - 1470