Effect of Digital Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids on Speech Intelligibility in Both Quiet and Noisy Environments

被引:1
作者
Deniz, Burcu [1 ]
Gulmez, Zuleyha D. [2 ]
Kara, Halide [3 ]
Kara, Eyyup [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Inst Grad Studies, Dept Audiol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Audiol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Fac Med, Dept Audiol, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
hearing aid; real ear measurement; speech intelligibility; hearing in noise test; signal-to-noise ratio;
D O I
10.4103/nah.nah_67_23
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Aims: Digital noise reduction (DNR) minimizes the effect of noise on speech signals by continuously monitoring frequency bands in the presence of noise. In the present study, we explored the effect of DNR technology on speech intelligibility in individuals using hearing aids (HAs) and investigated implications for daily use. Methods and material: Eighteen participants with bilateral moderate sensorineural hearing loss (aged 16-45 years) were included. Bilateral receiver-in-the-ear HAs were fitted in the participants. The adaptive and nonadaptive (with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of +5 and -5 dB, respectively) Turkish matrix sentence test (TURMatrix) in noise and free-field hearing assessments, including hearing thresholds with hearing aids, speech recognition thresholds (SRT), and speech discrimination scores, were conducted in two different conditions: HA in the DNR-on and DNR-off conditions. Results: No significant difference was observed between free-field hearing assessments with the HA in the DNR-off and DNR-on conditions (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the adaptive and nonadaptive TURMatrix revealed significant differences between the scores under the DNR-on and DNR-off conditions (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, under the DNR-on condition, there was no correlation between free-field hearing assessments with HA and TURMatrix results (P > 0.05). However, a significant correlation was observed between SRT scores with HA and TURMatrix scores (adaptive and nonadaptive, +5 and -5 dB SNR, respectively) under the DNR-off condition (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Our study findings suggest that DNR can improve speech intelligibility in noisy environments. Therefore, DNR can enhance an individual's auditory comfort by improving their capacity to grasp speech in background noise.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 225
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid [J].
Alcántara, JI ;
Moore, BCJ ;
Kühnel, V ;
Launer, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2003, 42 (01) :34-42
[2]   Digital noise reduction: Outcomes from laboratory and field studies [J].
Bentler, Ruth ;
Wu, Yu-Hsiang ;
Kettel, Jerrica ;
Hurtig, Richard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2008, 47 (08) :447-460
[3]  
Bentler Ruth, 2006, Trends Amplif, V10, P67
[4]  
Clark J G, 1981, ASHA, V23, P493
[5]  
Dillon H., 2012, HEARING AIDS, V2nd
[6]   Psychometric Comparison of the Hearing in Noise Test and the American English Matrix Test [J].
Harianawala, Jumana ;
Galster, Jason ;
Hornsby, Benjamin .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2019, 30 (04) :315-+
[7]   The Effect of Background Noise on Intelligibility of Dysphonic Speech [J].
Ishikawa, Keiko ;
Boyce, Suzanne ;
Kelchner, Lisa ;
Powell, Maria Golla ;
Schieve, Heidi ;
de Alarcon, Alessandro ;
Khosla, Sid .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2017, 60 (07) :1919-1929
[8]   Effect of Digital Noise Reduction of Hearing Aids on Music and Speech Perception [J].
Kim, Hyo Jeong ;
Lee, Jae Hee ;
Shim, Hyun Joon .
JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2020, 24 (04) :180-190
[9]  
Kochkin S., 2010, HEAR J, V63, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1097/01.HJ.0000366912.40173.76, 10.1097/01.HJ.0000366912.40173.76]
[10]   The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review [J].
Kollmeier, Birger ;
Warzybok, Anna ;
Hochmuth, Sabine ;
Zokoll, Melanie A. ;
Uslar, Verena ;
Brand, Thomas ;
Wagener, Kirsten C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 54 :3-16