Investigating the effects of environmental taxes on economic growth: Evidence from empirical analysis in European countries

被引:10
作者
Tchapchet-Tchouto, Jules-Eric [1 ]
Kone, Noukignon [2 ]
Njoya, Loudi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dschang, Fac Econ & Management, Publ Econ Dept, Dschang, Cameroon
[2] Univ Rouen, LASTA, UFR Droit, Sci Econ & Gest, Rouen, France
[3] Univ Dschang, Fac Econ & Management, Dschang Sch Econ, Dschang, Cameroon
关键词
environmental tax policy; economic growth; OLS; quantile analysis; threshold effects; European Countries (EU-28); (EU-28); European Environmental Agency Countries (EEA-32); DOUBLE-DIVIDEND; REFORM; POLICY; POLLUTION; TAXATION; QUALITY; TERM;
D O I
10.21511/ee.13(1).2022.01
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper empirically analyze the effects of environmental taxes on economic growth using data spanning the period 2009-2019 across 31 European countries (28 from the European Union, including the UK before Brexit, Iceland and Norway, which are candidates to join the EU, and Switzerland). The selected countries are also members of the European Environmental Agency countries (EEA-32). Baseline scenario with Pooled Ordinary Least Squares leads to the evidence that an increase of the environmental taxes in case of any tax policy reform will exacerbate economic growth. Robustness checks by introducing more control variables in response to omitted variables bias, coupling with GMM estimations that control for endogeneity concerns, consistently confirm the results. Deeping more with quantile analysis regression, a negative effect is confirmed in each quantile, and the results are significant at 1%. Nevertheless, there is a discrepancy between each quantile that allows highlighting evidence of countries' threshold effects. In fact, low-income countries are more negatively affected than upper and medium-income countries. As the official communication of the EU Commission is always in demand of empirical research concerning the economic impacts of environmental policy instruments, the paper sheds light on the possibility of discussing and adapting the EU strategy based on a harmonization system. This evidence of differentiated effects among countries' thresholds in the absence of any compensation may raise equity considerations within heterogeneous countries. Therefore, this paper fulfills the gaps in the inconclusive results in the existing literature.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Environmental taxes and economic growth: Evidence from panel causality tests [J].
Abdullah, Sabah ;
Morley, Bruce .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 42 :27-33
[2]  
Ambec S., 2007, Working Paper GAEL No. 2007-05
[3]  
Andersen S. M., 2007, Final report to the European Commission
[4]   Paying the piper and calling the tune? A meta-regression analysis of the double-dividend hypothesis [J].
Anger, Niels ;
Boehringer, Christoph ;
Loeschel, Andreas .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (07) :1495-1502
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, POLITICAL EC ENVIRON
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, TAXATION INNOVATION
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Towards Green Growth?: Tracking Progress, OECD Green Growth Studies, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264234437-EN
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Study on Economic and Environmental Implications of the use of Environmental Taxes and Charges in the European Union and Member States
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Green Economy: Developing Countries Success Stories
[10]  
Bakker A., 2009, TAX ENV WORLD POSSIB