Engineering conversation: Understanding the control requirements of language production in monologue and dialogue

被引:0
作者
Gambi, Chiara [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Fan [3 ]
Pickering, Martin J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Dept Psychol, Warwick CV4 7AL, England
[2] Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Cardiff CF10 3AT, Wales
[3] Univ Sussex, Sch Engn & Informat, Dept Engn & Design, Brighton BN1 9QJ, England
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, Scotland
关键词
Control theory; Forward models; Language production; Planning; Dialogue; INTERMITTENT CONTROL; PREDICTION ERROR; TURN-TAKING; SPEECH; MODEL; COMPREHENSION; EXPECTATION; PERCEPTION; BRAIN; TEXT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneuroling.2024.101229
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Both artificial and biological systems are faced with the challenge of noisy and uncertain estimation of the state of the world, in contexts where feedback is often delayed. This challenge also applies to the processes of language production and comprehension, both when they take place in isolation (e.g., in monologue or solo reading) and when they are combined as is the case in dialogue. Crucially, we argue, dialogue brings with it some unique challenges. In this paper, we describe three such challenges within the general framework of control theory, drawing analogies to mechanical and biological systems where possible: (1) the need to distinguish between self- and other-generated utterances; (2) the need to adjust the amount of advance planning (i.e., the degree to which planning precedes articulation) flexibly to achieve timely turn-taking; (3) the need to track changing conversational goals. We show that message-to-sound models of language production (i.e., those that cover the whole process from message generation to articulation) tend to implement fairly simple control architectures. However, we argue that more sophisticated control architectures are necessary to build language production models that can account for both monologue and dialogue.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Next speakers plan word forms in overlap with the incoming turn: evidence from gaze-contingent switch task performance
    Barthel, Mathias
    Levinson, Stephen C.
    [J]. LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 35 (09) : 1183 - 1202
  • [2] Bock K., 1994, Handbook of Psycholinguistics, P945
  • [3] Ultrasound measurements of interactive turn-taking in question-answer sequences: Articulatory preparation is delayed but not tied to the response
    Boegels, Sara
    Levinson, Stephen C.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (07):
  • [4] Neural correlates of turn-taking in the wild: Response planning starts early in free interviews
    Bogels, Sara
    [J]. COGNITION, 2020, 203
  • [5] Planning versus comprehension in turn-taking: Fast responders show reduced anticipatory processing of the question
    Bogels, Sara
    Casillas, Marisa
    Levinson, Stephen C.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2018, 109 : 295 - 310
  • [6] Neural signatures of response planning occur midway through an incoming question in conversation
    Bogels, Sara
    Magyari, Lilla
    Levinson, Stephen C.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [7] Neural Representations and Mechanisms for the Performance of Simple Speech Sequences
    Bohland, Jason W.
    Bullock, Daniel
    Guenther, Frank H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 22 (07) : 1504 - 1529
  • [8] Planning as inference
    Botvinick, Matthew
    Toussaint, Marc
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (10) : 485 - 488
  • [9] A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing
    Brouwer, Harm
    Crocker, Matthew W.
    Venhuizen, Noortje J.
    Hoeks, John C. J.
    [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2017, 41 : 1318 - 1352
  • [10] Processes of incremental message planning during conversation
    Brown-Schmidt, Sarah
    Konopka, Agnieszka E.
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2015, 22 (03) : 833 - 843