Clinical and Dosimetric Comparison Between Non-image Guided Radiation Therapy and Fiducial-Based Image Guided Radiation Therapy With or Without Reduced Margin in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Serizawa, Itsuko [1 ]
Kozuka, Takuyo [2 ]
Soyano, Takashi [3 ]
Sasamura, Kazuma [4 ]
Kamima, Tatsuya [1 ]
Kunogi, Hiroaki [1 ]
Kurihara, Nozomi [5 ]
Numao, Noboru [6 ]
Yamamoto, Shinya [6 ]
Yonese, Junji [6 ]
Yoshioka, Yasuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Natl Hosp Org Tokyo Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Musashino Red Cross Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Clin Trial Planning & Management, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
DOSE-ESCALATION TRIAL; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; TOXICITY; MULTICENTER; OUTCOMES; IMRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2024.101612
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the outcomes and toxicities between patients treated with image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) using fiducial markers and non-IGRT in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: In total, 518 patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer received IMRT with 78 Gy in 39 fractions after neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy for at least 3 months. Of these patients, 371 were in the non-IGRT group and 147 in the IGRT group, including the IGRT-A group using the same margins as the non-IGRT group and the IGRT-B group using reduced margins. The median follow-up periods for the non-IGRT, IGRT-A, and IGRT-B groups were 99 months, 88 months, and 63 months, respectively. Results: The 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rates in the non-IGRT, IGRT-A, and IGRT-B groups were 88%, 95%, and 98% (non-IGRT vs IGRT-A, P = .396; IGRT-A vs IGRT-B, P = .426), respectively. Those for intermediate- and high-risk patients were 94%, 93%, and 96% (non-IGRT vs IGRT-A, P = .916; IGRT-A vs IGRT-B, P = .646), respectively, and 87%, 96%, and 100% (non-IGRT vs IGRT-A, P = .500; IGRT-A vs IGRT-B, P = .483), respectively. For the non-IGRT and IGRT-A groups, the rates of acute grade >= 2 gastrointestinal toxicities and late grade >= 2 genitourinary toxicities were 17% and 7% (P = .019), respectively, and 28% and 16% (P = .028), respectively. In the IGRT-A and IGRT-B groups, the rates of acute grade >= 2 genitourinary toxicities were 45% and 21% (P = .003), respectively. All V60(Gy) = the volume at least received 60Gy and V70(Gy) = the volume at least received 70Gy values of the bladder and rectal walls in the IGRT-B group were smaller than those in the IGRT-A group. Conclusions: IGRT with fiducial markers results in lower acute and late toxicities compared with non-IGRT in IMRT for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Moreover, the toxicities are further decreased by reducing the margins in the treatment planning under IGRT. These processes do not decrease the biochemical recurrence-free survival rates. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open accessarticle under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dose escalation (81 Gy) with image-guided radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for localized prostate cancer: A retrospective preliminary result
    Huang, Sheng-Yao
    Wu, Chen-Ta
    Liu, Dai-Wei
    Wang, Tzu-Hwei
    Liao, Yen-Hsiang
    Chen, Yi-Wei
    Hsu, Wen-Lin
    TZU CHI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 32 (01): : 75 - 81
  • [22] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic malignancies
    Ali, Arif N.
    Dhabaan, Anees H.
    Jarrio, Christie S.
    Siddiqi, Arsalan K.
    Landry, Jerome C.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2012, 37 (03) : 271 - 275
  • [23] Image-guided, intensity-modulated radiation therapy in definitive radiotherapy for 1433 patients with cervical cancer
    Wang, Weiping
    Zhang, Fuquan
    Hu, Ke
    Hou, Xiaorong
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 151 (03) : 444 - 448
  • [24] Image-guided radiation therapy: Physicians perspectives
    Gupta, T.
    Narayan, C. Anand
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 37 (04) : 174 - 182
  • [25] Acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity of image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer using a daily water-filled endorectal balloon
    Deville, Curtiland
    Both, Stefan
    Bui, Viet
    Hwang, Wei-Ting
    Tan, Kay-See
    Schaer, Mattia
    Tochner, Zelig
    Vapiwala, Neha
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7
  • [26] Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the management of prostate cancer
    Teh, BS
    Amosson, CM
    Mai, WY
    McGary, J
    Grant, WH
    Butler, EB
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2004, 22 (06) : 913 - 924
  • [27] The role of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in gynaecological radiation therapy: A dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy versus VMAT
    Knapp, Penelope
    Eva, Belinda
    Reseigh, Gemma
    Gibbs, Adrian
    Sim, Lucy
    Daly, Tiffany
    Cox, Judith
    Bernard, Anne
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2019, 66 (01) : 44 - 53
  • [28] Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated and volumetric arc radiation therapy for gastric cancer
    Li, Zhiping
    Zeng, Jianshuang
    Wang, Zi
    Zhu, Hong
    Wei, Yuquan
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 8 (04) : 1427 - 1434
  • [29] Dosimetric effects of endorectal balloons on intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans for prostate cancer
    Kim, Jae-Sung
    Chung, Jin-Beom
    Kim, In-Ah
    Eom, Keun-Yong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 63 (08) : 1637 - 1643
  • [30] Daily Versus Weekly Prostate Cancer Image Guided Radiation Therapy: Phase 3 Multicenter Randomized Trial
    de Crevoisier, Renaud
    Bayar, Mohamed Amine
    Pommier, Pascal
    Muracciole, Xavier
    Pene, Francoise
    Dudouet, Philippe
    Latorzeff, Igor
    Beckendorf, Veronique
    Bachaud, Jean-Marc
    Laplanche, Agnes
    Supiot, Stephane
    Chauvet, Bruno
    Tan-Dat Nguyen
    Bossi, Alberto
    Crehange, Gilles
    Lagrange, Jean Leon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (05): : 1420 - 1429