Clinical and Dosimetric Comparison Between Non-image Guided Radiation Therapy and Fiducial-Based Image Guided Radiation Therapy With or Without Reduced Margin in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Serizawa, Itsuko [1 ]
Kozuka, Takuyo [2 ]
Soyano, Takashi [3 ]
Sasamura, Kazuma [4 ]
Kamima, Tatsuya [1 ]
Kunogi, Hiroaki [1 ]
Kurihara, Nozomi [5 ]
Numao, Noboru [6 ]
Yamamoto, Shinya [6 ]
Yonese, Junji [6 ]
Yoshioka, Yasuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Natl Hosp Org Tokyo Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Musashino Red Cross Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Clin Trial Planning & Management, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
DOSE-ESCALATION TRIAL; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; TOXICITY; MULTICENTER; OUTCOMES; IMRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2024.101612
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the outcomes and toxicities between patients treated with image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) using fiducial markers and non-IGRT in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: In total, 518 patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer received IMRT with 78 Gy in 39 fractions after neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy for at least 3 months. Of these patients, 371 were in the non-IGRT group and 147 in the IGRT group, including the IGRT-A group using the same margins as the non-IGRT group and the IGRT-B group using reduced margins. The median follow-up periods for the non-IGRT, IGRT-A, and IGRT-B groups were 99 months, 88 months, and 63 months, respectively. Results: The 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rates in the non-IGRT, IGRT-A, and IGRT-B groups were 88%, 95%, and 98% (non-IGRT vs IGRT-A, P = .396; IGRT-A vs IGRT-B, P = .426), respectively. Those for intermediate- and high-risk patients were 94%, 93%, and 96% (non-IGRT vs IGRT-A, P = .916; IGRT-A vs IGRT-B, P = .646), respectively, and 87%, 96%, and 100% (non-IGRT vs IGRT-A, P = .500; IGRT-A vs IGRT-B, P = .483), respectively. For the non-IGRT and IGRT-A groups, the rates of acute grade >= 2 gastrointestinal toxicities and late grade >= 2 genitourinary toxicities were 17% and 7% (P = .019), respectively, and 28% and 16% (P = .028), respectively. In the IGRT-A and IGRT-B groups, the rates of acute grade >= 2 genitourinary toxicities were 45% and 21% (P = .003), respectively. All V60(Gy) = the volume at least received 60Gy and V70(Gy) = the volume at least received 70Gy values of the bladder and rectal walls in the IGRT-B group were smaller than those in the IGRT-A group. Conclusions: IGRT with fiducial markers results in lower acute and late toxicities compared with non-IGRT in IMRT for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Moreover, the toxicities are further decreased by reducing the margins in the treatment planning under IGRT. These processes do not decrease the biochemical recurrence-free survival rates. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open accessarticle under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric Evaluation of Planning Target Volume Margin Reduction for Prostate Cancer via Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Hwang, Taejin
    Kang, Sei-Kwon
    Cheong, Kwang-Ho
    Park, Soah
    Yoon, Jai-Woong
    Han, Taejin
    Kim, Haeyoung
    Lee, Meyeon
    Kim, Kyoung-Joo
    Bae, Hoonsik
    Suh, Tae-Suk
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 67 (01) : 129 - 135
  • [2] Dosimetric evaluation of image-guided radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Shan, Guoping
    Hu, Wei
    Chen, Lili
    Price, Robert A.
    Ma, C-M Charlie
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2021, 46 (02) : 117 - 126
  • [3] Utilization of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Image-Guided Radiation Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer: Is It Beneficial?
    Reese, Adam S.
    Lu, Wei
    Regine, William F.
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 24 (02) : 132 - 139
  • [4] Image-guided intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy decreases late gastrointestinal Side Effects after Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Finazzi, Tobias
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2017, 193 (02) : 162 - 164
  • [5] Helical tomotherapy: Image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Keum, Ki Chang
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 51 (07): : 619 - 629
  • [6] Image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy for gallbladder carcinoma
    Fuller, Clifton D.
    Thomas, Charles R., Jr.
    Wong, Adrian
    Cavanaugh, Sean X.
    Salter, Bill J.
    Herman, Terence S.
    Fuss, Martin
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [7] Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Image-Guided Adapted Brachytherapy for Cervix Cancer
    Lin, Alexander J.
    Kidd, Elizabeth
    Dehdashti, Farrokh
    Siegel, Barry A.
    Mutic, Sasa
    Thaker, Premal H.
    Massad, Leslie S.
    Powell, Matthew A.
    Mutch, David G.
    Markovina, Stephanie
    Schwarz, Julie
    Grigsby, Perry W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 103 (05): : 1088 - 1097
  • [8] Optimization and quality assurance of an image-guided radiation therapy system for intensity-modulated radiation therapy radiotherapy
    Tsai, Jen-San
    Micaily, Bizhan
    Miyamoto, Curtis
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2012, 37 (03) : 321 - 333
  • [9] Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?
    Melancon, Adam D.
    O'Danie, Jennifer C.
    Zhang, Lifei
    Kudchadker, Rajat J.
    Kuban, Deborah A.
    Lee, Andrew K.
    Cheung, Rex M.
    de Crevoisier, Renaud
    Tucker, Susan L.
    Newhauser, Wayne D.
    Mohan, Radhe
    Dong, Lei
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 85 (02) : 251 - 259
  • [10] The Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer by NCCN Risk Groups
    Ricco, Anthony
    Manahan, Genevieve
    Lanciano, Rachelle
    Hanlon, Alexandra
    Yang, Jun
    Arrigo, Stephen
    Lamond, John
    Feng, Jing
    Mooreville, Michael
    Garber, Bruce
    Brady, Luther
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2016, 6