The geography of circularity missions: A cross-country comparison of circular economy policy approaches in the Global North and Global South

被引:4
|
作者
Haswell, Fergus [1 ]
Edelenbosch, Oreane Y. [1 ]
Piscicelli, Laura [1 ]
van Vuuren, Detlef P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
Sustainability transitions; Circular economy; Missions -oriented innovation policy; Global North; Global South; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; SPATIAL PERSPECTIVE; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; ENERGY; GOVERNANCE; TRANSFORMATION; INSTRUMENT; HISTORY; AFRICA;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2024.100883
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Circular Economy (CE) is promoted as a sustainable model of economic growth and a quintessential example of a "sustainability mission." Despite expected co-benefits in job creation, waste reduction and poverty alleviation, the Global South is largely missing from both missions and CE literature. Employing cross-disciplinary insights from environmental policy and the geography of sustainability transitions, this paper documents the diffusion of CE missions and compares CE policy development between the Global North and Global South. Analysing 61 national-level CE strategic policy documents, we focus on the policy levers, CE strategies, materials and sectors. We show that CE mission development is widespread in the Global North and developing in the Global South. Despite linkages to other national-level social and sustainability agendas, CE policy instrument choice shows limited place-sensitivity and geographical variation. Where the Global South is replicating the Global North's CE trajectory, the transformative potential of circularity missions is threatened.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Country size bias in global health: cross-country comparison of malaria policy and foreign aid
    Jezek, Tomas
    GLOBAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND POLICY, 2021, 6 (01)
  • [2] Country size bias in global health: cross-country comparison of malaria policy and foreign aid
    Tomas Jezek
    Global Health Research and Policy, 6
  • [3] A Cross-Country Comparison of Fiscal Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Global Pandemic
    Chen, Can
    Shi, Yu
    Zhang, Ping
    Ding, Chengri
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS, 2021, 23 (02): : 262 - 273
  • [4] A cross-country comparison of malaria policy as a premise for contextualized appropriation of foreign aid in global health
    Jezek, Tomas
    Bamodu, Oluwaseun Adebayo
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [5] A cross-country comparison of malaria policy as a premise for contextualized appropriation of foreign aid in global health
    Tomas Jezek
    Oluwaseun Adebayo Bamodu
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 19
  • [6] Environment and policy factors shaping global e-commerce diffusion: A cross-country comparison
    Gibbs, J
    Kraemer, KL
    Dedrick, J
    INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2003, 19 (01): : 5 - 18
  • [7] Cross-country experiences and policy implications from the global financial crisis
    Claessens, Stijn
    Dell'Ariccia, Giovanni
    Igan, Deniz
    Laeven, Luc
    ECONOMIC POLICY, 2010, (62) : 267 - 293
  • [8] A cross-country analysis of the factors driving innovation performance in the Global South
    Niazi, Sajjad Khan
    POLICY STUDIES, 2025, 46 (02) : 221 - 251
  • [9] Governance, urbanization, and pollution: A cross-country analysis of global south region
    Dash, Devi Prasad
    Behera, Smruti Ranjan
    Rao, D. Tripati
    Sethi, Narayan
    Loganathan, Nanthakumar
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 8 (01):
  • [10] US monetary policy, the global financial cycle and cross-country financial cycles
    Gupta, Vrinda
    Dubey, Amlendu
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2024, 48 (04) : 999 - 1019