Access systems in general practice: a systematic scoping review

被引:1
作者
Eccles, Abi [1 ]
Bryce, Carol [1 ]
Driessen, Annelieke [2 ,3 ]
Pope, Catherine [4 ]
MacLellan, Jennifer [4 ]
Gronlund, Toto [5 ]
Nicholson, Brian D. [4 ]
Ziebland, Sue [4 ]
Atherton, Helen [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Warwick Appl Hlth, Gibbet Hill, Coventry CV4 7AL, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Anthropol Dept, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Med Sociol, Oxford, England
[5] Univ Southampton, Primary Care Populat Sci & Med Educ, Southampton, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
appointments and schedules; general practice; primary health care; SAME-DAY APPOINTMENTS; NURSE TELEPHONE TRIAGE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PRIMARY-CARE; DAY CONSULTATION; MANAGE REQUESTS; HEALTH; WORKLOAD; IMPACT; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.3399/BJGP.2023.0149
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Access to GP appointments is increasingly challenging in many high- income countries, with an overstretched workforce and rising demand. Various access systems have been developed and evaluated internationally. Aim To systematically consolidate the current international evidence base related to different types of GP access systems. Design and setting Scoping review examining international literature. Method Literature searches were run across relevant databases in May 2022. Title, abstract, and full-text screenings were carried out. Data from included studies were extracted and mapped to synthesise the components and aims within different GP access systems. Results In total, 49 studies were included in the review. The majority of these were set in the UK. Some access systems featured heavily in the literature, such as Advanced Access, telephone triage, and online consultations, and others less so. There were two key strategies adopted by systems that related to either changing appointment capacity or modifying patient pathways. Components related to these strategies are summarised and illustrated as a schematic representation. Most rationales behind access systems were practice, rather than patient, focused. 'Add-on' systems and aims for efficiency have become more popular in recent years. Conclusion This synthesis provides a useful tool in understanding access systems' aims, design, and implementation. With focus on alleviating demand, patient-focused outcomes appear to be underinvestigated and potentially overlooked during design and implementation. More recently, digital services have been promoted as offering patient choice and convenience. But a context where demand outweighs resources challenges the premise that extending choice is possible.
引用
收藏
页码:E674 / E682
页数:9
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [31] Nurse management of 'same day' consultation for patients with minor illnesses: results of an extended programme in primary care in Catalonia
    Fabrellas, Nuria
    Vidal, Angel
    Amat, Gemma
    Lejardi, Yolanda
    del Puig Deulofeu, Maria
    Buendia, Carmen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2011, 67 (08) : 1811 - 1816
  • [32] General practitioners' perceptions towards the use of digital health services for citizens in primary care: a qualitative interview study
    Fagerlund, Asbjorn Johansen
    Holm, Inger Marie
    Zanaboni, Paolo
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [33] Implementing online consultations in primary care: a mixed-method evaluation extending normalisation process theory through service co-production
    Farr, Michelle
    Banks, Jonathan
    Edwards, Hannah B.
    Northstone, Kate
    Bernard, Elly
    Salisbury, Chris
    Horwood, Jeremy
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [34] Young heroin users in Baltimore: A qualitative study
    Gandhi, DH
    Kavanagh, GJ
    Jaffe, JH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE, 2006, 32 (02) : 177 - 188
  • [35] Garth B, 2013, AUST FAM PHYSICIAN, V42, P238
  • [36] Is fast access to general practice all that should matter? A discrete choice experiment of patients' preferences
    Gerard, Karen
    Salisbury, Chris
    Street, Deborah
    Pope, Catherine
    Baxter, Helen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2008, 13 : 3 - 10
  • [37] Gill N., 2007, Primary Care Research Development, V8, P235, DOI DOI 10.1017/S146342360700028X
  • [38] Telephone consultation in primary care: A retrospective two-year observational analysis of a public healthcare system
    Gonzalez, Francisco
    Cimadevila, Blanca
    Garcia-Comesana, Julio
    Cerqueiro, Susana
    Andion, Eladio
    Prado, Jorge
    Bermudez, Jorge
    Rubial, Felix
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 32 (02) : 321 - 337
  • [39] Goodall S, 2006, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V56, P918
  • [40] Gray E, 2018, BMJ OPEN, V8, DOI [10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021161, 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017593]