Access systems in general practice: a systematic scoping review

被引:1
作者
Eccles, Abi [1 ]
Bryce, Carol [1 ]
Driessen, Annelieke [2 ,3 ]
Pope, Catherine [4 ]
MacLellan, Jennifer [4 ]
Gronlund, Toto [5 ]
Nicholson, Brian D. [4 ]
Ziebland, Sue [4 ]
Atherton, Helen [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Warwick Appl Hlth, Gibbet Hill, Coventry CV4 7AL, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Anthropol Dept, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Med Sociol, Oxford, England
[5] Univ Southampton, Primary Care Populat Sci & Med Educ, Southampton, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
appointments and schedules; general practice; primary health care; SAME-DAY APPOINTMENTS; NURSE TELEPHONE TRIAGE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PRIMARY-CARE; DAY CONSULTATION; MANAGE REQUESTS; HEALTH; WORKLOAD; IMPACT; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.3399/BJGP.2023.0149
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Access to GP appointments is increasingly challenging in many high- income countries, with an overstretched workforce and rising demand. Various access systems have been developed and evaluated internationally. Aim To systematically consolidate the current international evidence base related to different types of GP access systems. Design and setting Scoping review examining international literature. Method Literature searches were run across relevant databases in May 2022. Title, abstract, and full-text screenings were carried out. Data from included studies were extracted and mapped to synthesise the components and aims within different GP access systems. Results In total, 49 studies were included in the review. The majority of these were set in the UK. Some access systems featured heavily in the literature, such as Advanced Access, telephone triage, and online consultations, and others less so. There were two key strategies adopted by systems that related to either changing appointment capacity or modifying patient pathways. Components related to these strategies are summarised and illustrated as a schematic representation. Most rationales behind access systems were practice, rather than patient, focused. 'Add-on' systems and aims for efficiency have become more popular in recent years. Conclusion This synthesis provides a useful tool in understanding access systems' aims, design, and implementation. With focus on alleviating demand, patient-focused outcomes appear to be underinvestigated and potentially overlooked during design and implementation. More recently, digital services have been promoted as offering patient choice and convenience. But a context where demand outweighs resources challenges the premise that extending choice is possible.
引用
收藏
页码:E674 / E682
页数:9
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [101] Youde K, 2010, INDEPENDENT
  • [102] Patients' use and experiences with e-consultation and other digital health services with their general practitioner in Norway: results from an online survey
    Zanaboni, Paolo
    Fagerlund, Asbjorn Johansen
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (06):
  • [103] Zhao Peng, 2017, J Med Internet Res, V19, pe134, DOI 10.2196/jmir.6747
  • [104] Power, paradox and pessimism: On the unintended consequences of digital health technologies in primary care
    Ziebland, Sue
    Hyde, Emma
    Powell, John
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2021, 289
  • [105] Health and Illness in a Connected World: How Might Sharing Experiences on the Internet Affect People's Health?
    Ziebland, Sue
    Wyke, Sally
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2012, 90 (02) : 219 - 249