Access systems in general practice: a systematic scoping review

被引:1
作者
Eccles, Abi [1 ]
Bryce, Carol [1 ]
Driessen, Annelieke [2 ,3 ]
Pope, Catherine [4 ]
MacLellan, Jennifer [4 ]
Gronlund, Toto [5 ]
Nicholson, Brian D. [4 ]
Ziebland, Sue [4 ]
Atherton, Helen [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Warwick Appl Hlth, Gibbet Hill, Coventry CV4 7AL, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Anthropol Dept, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Med Sociol, Oxford, England
[5] Univ Southampton, Primary Care Populat Sci & Med Educ, Southampton, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
appointments and schedules; general practice; primary health care; SAME-DAY APPOINTMENTS; NURSE TELEPHONE TRIAGE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PRIMARY-CARE; DAY CONSULTATION; MANAGE REQUESTS; HEALTH; WORKLOAD; IMPACT; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.3399/BJGP.2023.0149
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Access to GP appointments is increasingly challenging in many high- income countries, with an overstretched workforce and rising demand. Various access systems have been developed and evaluated internationally. Aim To systematically consolidate the current international evidence base related to different types of GP access systems. Design and setting Scoping review examining international literature. Method Literature searches were run across relevant databases in May 2022. Title, abstract, and full-text screenings were carried out. Data from included studies were extracted and mapped to synthesise the components and aims within different GP access systems. Results In total, 49 studies were included in the review. The majority of these were set in the UK. Some access systems featured heavily in the literature, such as Advanced Access, telephone triage, and online consultations, and others less so. There were two key strategies adopted by systems that related to either changing appointment capacity or modifying patient pathways. Components related to these strategies are summarised and illustrated as a schematic representation. Most rationales behind access systems were practice, rather than patient, focused. 'Add-on' systems and aims for efficiency have become more popular in recent years. Conclusion This synthesis provides a useful tool in understanding access systems' aims, design, and implementation. With focus on alleviating demand, patient-focused outcomes appear to be underinvestigated and potentially overlooked during design and implementation. More recently, digital services have been promoted as offering patient choice and convenience. But a context where demand outweighs resources challenges the premise that extending choice is possible.
引用
收藏
页码:E674 / E682
页数:9
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [1] A qualitative study of the impact of the implementation of advanced access in primary healthcare on the working lives of general practice staff
    Ahluwalia S.
    Offredy M.
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 6 (1)
  • [2] Reconfiguring diagnostic work in Danish general practice; regulation, triage and the secretaries as diagnostician
    Andersen, Rikke Sand
    Aarhus, Rikke
    [J]. ANTHROPOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2019, 26 (02) : 213 - 227
  • [3] Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, DOI [10.1080/13645570320001196164, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
  • [4] Atherton H, 2018, POTENTIAL ALTERNATIV
  • [5] What do we need to consider when planning, implementing and researching the use of alternatives to face-to-face consultations in primary healthcare?
    Atherton, Helen
    Ziebland, Sue
    [J]. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2016, 2
  • [6] Baker Nick, 2023, UK mobile phone statistics
  • [7] Qualitative study of patient views on a 'telephone-first' approach in general practice in England: speaking to the GP by telephone before making face-to-face appointments
    Ball, Sarah L.
    Newbould, Jennifer
    Corbett, Jennie
    Exley, Josephine
    Pitchforth, Emma
    Roland, Martin
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (12):
  • [8] Bang Maria, 2020, BJGP Open, V4, DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101091
  • [9] Use of an electronic consultation system primary care: a qualitative interview study
    Banks, Jon
    Farr, Michelle
    Salisbury, Chris
    Bernard, Elly
    Northstone, Kate
    Edwards, Hannah
    Horwood, Jeremy
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 68 (666) : E1 - E8
  • [10] Electronic patient-provider communication: Will it offset office visits and telephone consultations in primary care?
    Bergmo, TS
    Kummervold, PE
    Gammon, D
    Dahl, LB
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2005, 74 (09) : 705 - 710