Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes

被引:0
作者
Changizian, Maziar [1 ,2 ]
Shirkhani, Zahra [1 ]
Tamsilian, Yousef [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Chamran Univ Ahvaz, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Ahvaz, Iran
[2] Shahid Chamran Univ Ahvaz, Gas Networks Res Ctr, Ahvaz, Iran
关键词
Liquefied natural gas (LNG); Conventional LNG processes; Efficiency assessment; Sensitivity assessment; Energy efficiency; Exergy efficiency; OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study delves into the comprehensive analysis of four conventional mixed refrigerant liquefaction processes, namely C3MR-Linde, C3MR-APCI, SMR-Linde, and SMR-APCI, emphasizing energy and exergy perspectives. According to the energy analysis, C3MR-Linde demonstrates a lower energy consumption than the other systems, at 0.271 kWh kg-1 liquefied natural gas, while SMR-Air Products achieves the highest coefficient of performance (COP) at 2.67 kWh kg-1. The exergy analysis provides insights into the exergy efficiency and destruction of components, highlighting the C3MR-Linde process as the most exergy-efficient process, attaining 47.55%. Notably, compressors are identified as the primary sources of exergy destruction, accounting for 52.11%, 52.51%, and 45.39% of the overall cycle exergy destruction in the C3MR-APCI, C3MR-Linde, and SMR-APCI cycles, respectively. Furthermore, this study investigates how certain operational factors affect the COP, specific energy consumption (SEC), and exergy indices. It is observed that each cycle exhibits an optimal pressure drop in the expansion valves, with deviations resulting in a decreased COP and increased SEC. Additionally, changes in the refrigerant molar flow rates demonstrate an inverse relationship between the exergy efficiency and COP, with the SEC being notably more sensitive to such variations than the COP within the studied parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:9477 / 9499
页数:23
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Optimization of propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant LNG plant
    Alabdulkarem, Abdullah
    Mortazavi, Amir
    Hwang, Yunho
    Radermacher, Reinhard
    Rogers, Peter
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 31 (6-7) : 1091 - 1098
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, INT ENERGY OUTLOOK 2
  • [3] Bejan A., 1996, THERMAL DESIGN OPTIM, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0140-7007(97)87632-3
  • [4] Brodyansky V.M., 1994, ENERGY RES, V9
  • [5] Design and analysis of the natural gas liquefaction optimization process- CCC-ES (energy storage of cryogenic carbon capture)
    Fazlollahi, Farhad
    Bown, Alex
    Ebrahimzadeh, Edris
    Baxter, Larry L.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2015, 90 : 244 - 257
  • [6] Exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective Pareto optimization of the C3MR liquefaction process
    Ghorbani, Bahram
    Hamedi, Mohammad-Hossein
    Shirmohammadi, Reza
    Hamedi, Mohsen
    Mehrpooya, Mehdi
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2016, 17 : 56 - 67
  • [7] Review on the design and optimization of natural gas liquefaction processes for onshore and offshore applications
    He, Tianbiao
    Karimi, Iftekhar A.
    Ju, Yonglin
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2018, 132 : 89 - 114
  • [8] International Gas Union, 2019, 2019 WORLD LNG REPOR
  • [9] Jensen JB., 2006, P ADCHEM, DOI [10.3182/20060402-4-BR-2902.00241, DOI 10.3182/20060402-4-BR-2902.00241]
  • [10] Exergy analysis of multistage cascade refrigeration cycle used for natural gas liquefaction
    Kanoglu, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2002, 26 (08) : 763 - 774