Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of New Kabuli-Type Chickpea Lines in Australia for Resistance to Ascochyta Blight

被引:0
作者
Subedi, Megha [1 ]
Bhattarai, Surya [1 ]
Adorada, Dante L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent Queensland Univ, Inst Future Farming Syst, Rockhampton, Qld 4701, Australia
[2] Univ Southern Queensland, Ctr Crop Hlth, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
来源
CROPS | 2024年 / 4卷 / 03期
关键词
Ascochyta rabiei; marker-aided selection (MAS); phenotype; genotype; CICER-ARIETINUM L; MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION; TAGGED MICROSATELLITE SITES; PLANT-AGE; DISEASE; RABIEI; EFFICIENCY; INFECTION; WILD;
D O I
10.3390/crops4030028
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Ascochyta blight (AB) is a major threat to Kabuli-type chickpea production worldwide. This study aimed to identify AB-resistant Kabuli-type chickpea lines through combined phenotypic and genotypic screening. Twenty-six Kabuli-type chickpea lines were phenotyped at the seedling stage using spray inoculation with conidial suspension. Genotyping employed marker-aided selection (MAS) with markers linked to quantitative trait loci (QTL) for AB resistance. The allele-specific marker, CaETR, closely linked to QTLAR1, and the sequence-tagged microsatellite (STMS) markers GAA47, TAA146, and TA194 linked to QTLAR1, QTLAR2, and QTLAR3 were used to assess their utility in distinguishing between resistant and susceptible chickpea lines. The study revealed that none of the lines tested were completely resistant (R) phenotypically. However, some lines, such as AVTCPK#6 and AVTCPK#14, were found to be moderately resistant (MR). Of the two MR lines identified phenotypically, only AVTCPK#6 was found to have bands linked to QTLs for adult plant resistance. The other MR line for AB showed the presence of bands in only one or two of the four markers used. These MR lines can be further utilized in chickpea breeding programs for the development of AB-resistant chickpea cultivars. It is recommended that these results be verified through repeat experiments, using more diverse isolates, and including additional chickpea lines as reference checks for resistance and susceptibility. The allele-specific marker, CaETR, closely linked to QTL(AR1) and sequence-tagged microsatellite (STMS) markers GAA47, TAA146 and TA194 linked to QTL(AR1), QTL(AR2), and QTL(AR3) were used to explore these markers' utility in discriminating between resistant and susceptible chickpea lines. The study showed that phenotypically, none of the lines tested are completely resistant (R). However, some lines, namely AVTCPK#6 and AVTCPK#14, were found to be moderately resistant (MR). Of the two MR lines identified phenotypically, only AVTCPK#6 was identified to have bands linked to QTLs for adult plant resistance. The other MR line for AB showed the presence of bands in only one or two markers among the four markers used. These MR lines can be exploited further in chickpea breeding programs for the development of AB-resistant chickpea cultivars. It is recommended that these results are verified by repeat experiments, using more as well as diverse isolates alongside additional chickpea lines for resistant and susceptible reference checks.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 412
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] ABC Rural Australia the Worlds, 2023, Largest Exporter of Chickpea as Pulse Council Purses Further Growth
  • [2] Arya M., 2019, Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechnol., V12, P141, DOI [10.30954/0974-1712.06.2019.10, DOI 10.30954/0974-1712.06.2019.10]
  • [3] Current population structure and pathogenicity patterns of Ascochyta rabiei in Australia
    Bar, Ido
    Sambasivam, Prabhakaran Thanjavur
    Davidson, Jenny
    Farfan-Caceres, Lina M.
    Lee, Robert C.
    Hobson, Kristy
    Moore, Kevin
    Ford, Rebecca
    [J]. MICROBIAL GENOMICS, 2021, 7 (07):
  • [4] Development of ascochyta blight (Ascochyta rabiei) in chickpea as affected by host resistance and plant age
    Basandrai, A. K.
    Basandrai, D.
    Pande, S.
    Sharma, M.
    Thakur, Sanjay K.
    Thakur, H. L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2007, 119 (01) : 77 - 86
  • [5] Ecogeography of annual wild Cicer species:: The poor state of the world collection
    Berger, J
    Abbo, S
    Turner, NC
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2003, 43 (03) : 1076 - 1090
  • [6] Genetics of ascochyta blight resistance in chickpea
    Bhardwaj, R.
    Sandhu, J. S.
    Kaur, Livinder
    Gupta, S. K.
    Gaur, P. M.
    Varshney, R.
    [J]. EUPHYTICA, 2010, 171 (03) : 337 - 343
  • [7] Bouhadida M, 2013, PHYTOPATHOL MEDITERR, V52, P202
  • [8] Efficiency of marker-assisted selection for ascochyta blight in chickpea
    Castro, P.
    Rubio, J.
    Madrid, E.
    Fernandez-Romero, M. D.
    Millan, T.
    Gil, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2015, 153 (01) : 56 - 67
  • [9] Chongo G, 2001, CAN J PLANT PATHOL, V23, P358
  • [10] Diagnosis, extent, impacts, and management of subsoil constraints in the northern grains cropping region of Australia
    Dang, Y. P.
    Dalal, R. C.
    Buck, S. R.
    Harms, B.
    Kelly, R.
    Hochman, Z.
    Schwenke, G. D.
    Biggs, A. J. W.
    Ferguson, N. J.
    Norrish, S.
    Routley, R.
    McDonald, M.
    Hall, C.
    Singh, D. K.
    Daniells, I. G.
    Farquharson, R.
    Manning, W.
    Speirs, S.
    Grewal, H. S.
    Cornish, P.
    Bodapati, N.
    Orange, D.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 2010, 48 (02): : 105 - 119