Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral screw fixation and stress endplate augmentation for treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis

被引:1
|
作者
Peng, Xingrui [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xiandi [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zhuhai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xie, Tianhang [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Run [1 ,2 ]
Ran, Liyu [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Xiao [1 ,2 ]
Zeng, Jiancheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, 37 GuoXue Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Orthoped Res Inst, 37 GuoXue Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Peoples Hosp Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Reg, Dept Spine Surg, 6 TaoYuan Rd, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Oblique lumbar interbody fusion; Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis; Anterolateral screw fixation; Stress endplate augmentation; Cage subsidence; Osteoporosis; CEMENT AUGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-024-08401-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the outcomes of Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF)combined with anterolateral screw fixation (AF) and Stress Endplate Augmentation(SEA) versus OLIF-AF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS)with osteoporosis (OP). Methods 30 patients underwent OLIF-AF-SEA (SEA group) were matched with 30 patients received OLIF-AF (control group), in terms of sex, age, body mass index (BMI) and bone mineral density (BMD). Clinical outcomes including visual analog scale (VAS) score of the lower back pain (VAS-LBP), leg pain (VAS-LP), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated at different postoperative intervals and comparedwith their preoperative counterparts. Radiographic outcomes such as disk height (DH), slip distance (SD), lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), cage subsidence (CS) rate and fusion rate were evaluated at different postoperative intervals and compared with their preoperative counterparts. Results SEA group presented to be better at 3-month and 12-month follow-up, the VAS-LBP, VAS-LP and ODI scores of the SEA group were significantly lower than the control group (3-month SEA vs control: 2.30 +/- 0.70 vs 3.30 +/- 0.75, 2.03 +/- 0.72 vs 2.90 +/- 0.76,15.60 +/- 2.36 vs 23.23 +/- 3.07, respectively, all p<0.05. VAS-LBP and ODI 12-month SEA vs control: 1.27 +/- 0.74 vs 1.93 +/- 0.58, 12.20 +/- 1.88 vs 14.43 +/- 1.89,respectively, all p<0.05). At 24-month follow-up, both groups showed no difference in fusion rate (83.33% vs 90.00%, p=0.45), while SEA group showed a lower CS rate (13.33% vs 53.33%, p<0.05). Conclusion OLIF-AF-SEA was safe with no adverse effects and resulted in lower CS rate and better sagittal balance. OLIF-AF-SEA is a promising surgical method for treating patients with DLS-OP.
引用
收藏
页码:3467 / 3475
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biomechanical effects of an oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior augmentation: a finite element analysis
    Huang, Shengjia
    Min, Shaoxiong
    Wang, Suwei
    Jin, Anmin
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [32] Comparison of Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation and Lateral Fixation in the Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Disease Patients with Osteopenia or Osteoporosis
    Wang, Xianzheng
    Liu, Huanan
    Wang, Weijian
    Sun, Yapeng
    Zhang, Fei
    Guo, Lei
    Li, Jiaqi
    Zhang, Wei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (12) : 3283 - 3292
  • [33] Comparison of the mid-term clinical efficacy of different fixtaion methods combined with oblique lumbar interbody fusion in treating lumbar degenerative diseases
    Yu, Yang
    Wang, Yongtao
    Xie, Yizhou
    Feng, Chengzhi
    Chen, Yuzhou
    Xu, Jiajia
    Fan, Xiaohong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 31 (03)
  • [34] Minimally invasive anterior oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) for degenerative lumbar disease
    Ye, Jia-Hui
    Ding, Jia-Ling
    Xiang, Zi-Yue
    Zhu, Si-Pin
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 43 (12) : 1214 - 1215
  • [35] Comparison of clinical outcomes and spino-pelvic sagittal balance in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis Minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
    Li, Renjie
    Shao, Xiaofeng
    Li, Xuefeng
    Liu, Yijie
    Jiang, Weimin
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (03) : E23783
  • [36] Early Clinical Results of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A New Modified Technique for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Nagahama, Ken
    Ito, Manabu
    Abe, Yuichiro
    Murota, Eihiro
    Hiratsuka, Shigeto
    Takahata, Masahiko
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 3 (04): : 327 - 334
  • [37] Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of oblique lateral interbody fusion and transforaminal interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Sun, Wen-xi
    Liu, Hao-nan
    Chen, Meng-tong
    Lin, Yong-peng
    Wang, Hong-shen
    Chen, Bo-lai
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2022, 7 (09) : 663 - 670
  • [38] A Comparative Study of Decompressive Laminectomy and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Grade I Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Kim, Sang-Il
    Ha, Kee-Yong
    Kim, Young-Hoon
    Kim, Young-Ho
    Oh, In-Soo
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 52 (04) : 358 - 362
  • [39] Anterior bone cement augmentation in anterior lumbar interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in patients with osteoporosis Clinical article
    Kim, Kyeong Hwan
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    Lee, Dong Yeob
    Shim, Chan Shik
    Maeng, Dae Hyeon
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 12 (05) : 525 - 532
  • [40] A Comparative Study of Decompressive Laminectomy and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Grade I Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Sang-Il Kim
    Kee-Yong Ha
    Young-Hoon Kim
    Young-Ho Kim
    In-Soo Oh
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2018, 52 : 358 - 362