Evaluation of alarm notification of artificial intelligence in automated analyzer detection of parasites

被引:0
作者
Wang, Zila [1 ]
Liao, Lin [1 ]
Huang, Ximei [1 ]
Lin, Faquan [1 ]
Tang, Jinguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Key Lab Clin Lab Med Guangxi Dept Educ, Dept Clin Lab, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
artificial intelligence; automated feces analyzer; deep learning machinery; diagnosis; intestinal parasites; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000039788
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To evaluate the alarm notification of artificial intelligence in detecting parasites on the KU-F40 Fully Automatic Feces Analyzer and provide a reference for clinical diagnosis in parasite diseases. A total of 1030 fecal specimens from patients in our hospital from May to June 2023 were collected, and parasite detection studies were conducted using the KU-F40 automated feces analyzer (normal mode method, floating-sedimentation mode method), acid-ether sedimentation method, and direct smear microscopy method, respectively. The positive detection rate of parasites in the 1030 fecal specimens was 22.9% (236 cases), of which the KU-F40 normal mode method had a detection rate of 16.3% (168 cases), the acid-ether sedimentation method had a detection rate of 19.0% (196 cases), and the direct smear microscopy method had a detection rate of 13.1% (135 cases). The detection rates of the first 2 methods were higher than those of the direct smear microscopy method, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). The detection rate of the KU-F40 floating-sedimentation mode method was 11.9% (123 cases), which was lower than that of the direct smear microscopy, and the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). The sensitivity of the KU-F40 normal mode method, acid-ether sedimentation method, direct smear microscopy method, and the KU-F40 floating-sedimentation mode method were 71.2%, 83.1%, 57.2%, and 52.1%, respectively, and the specificity was 94.7%, 100%, 100%, and 97.7%, respectively. The coincidence rates of the KU-F40 normal mode method was 90.78%, with Kappa values of 0.633. The positive detection rate of parasites using the KU-F40 normal mode method is higher than that using the direct smear microscopy method. It has high sensitivity and specificity and has advantages such as high automation and fast detection speed. It can replace the microscopy method for routine screening and has higher clinical application value in the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic diseases.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Chen M., 2017, Lab Med Clin Pract, V14, P1790
  • [2] Chen YD., 2020, Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis, V38, P5
  • [3] Jing Wen-wen, 2022, Chinese Journal of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, V40, P20
  • [4] Advances Towards Automatic Detection and Classification of Parasites Microscopic Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network: Methods, Models and Research Directions
    Kumar, Satish
    Arif, Tasleem
    Alotaibi, Abdullah S. S.
    Malik, Majid B. B.
    Manhas, Jatinder
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 30 (03) : 2013 - 2039
  • [5] Rapid diagnostic tests to improve treatment of malaria and other febrile illnesses: patient randomised effectiveness trial in primary care clinics in Afghanistan
    Leslie, Toby
    Mikhail, Amy
    Mayan, Ismail
    Cundill, Bonnie
    Anwar, Mohammed
    Bakhtash, Sayed Habib
    Mohammed, Nader
    Rahman, Habib
    Zekria, Rohullah
    Whitty, Christopher J. M.
    Rowland, Mark
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
  • [6] A robust and automatic method for human parasite egg recognition in microscopic images
    Li, Zhixun
    Gong, Huiling
    Zhang, Wei
    Chen, Lian
    Tao, Juncai
    Song, Langui
    Wu, Zhongdao
    [J]. PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 114 (10) : 3807 - 3813
  • [7] Lv GL., 2021, Trop Dis Parasitol, V19, P121
  • [8] Rapid diagnosis of parasitic diseases: current scenario and future needs
    Momcilovic, S.
    Cantacessi, C.
    Arsic-Arsenijevic, V.
    Otranto, D.
    Tasic-Otasevic, S.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2019, 25 (03) : 290 - 309
  • [9] Evaluation of the VETSCAN IMAGYST: an in-clinic canine and feline fecal parasite detection system integrated with a deep learning algorithm
    Nagamori, Yoko
    Hall Sedlak, Ruth
    DeRosa, Andrew
    Pullins, Aleah
    Cree, Travis
    Loenser, Michael
    Larson, Benjamin S.
    Smith, Richard Boyd
    Goldstein, Richard
    [J]. PARASITES & VECTORS, 2020, 13 (01)
  • [10] Automatic recognition of parasitic products in stool examination using object detection approach
    Naing, Kaung Myat
    Boonsang, Siridech
    Chuwongin, Santhad
    Kittichai, Veerayuth
    Tongloy, Teerawat
    Prommongkol, Samrerng
    Dekumyoy, Paron
    Watthanakulpanich, Dorn
    [J]. PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2022, 8