Effect of Switching the Histamine-1 Receptor Antagonist Clemastine to Cetirizine in Paclitaxel Premedication Regimens: The H1-Switch Study

被引:1
作者
Malmberg, Ruben [1 ,2 ]
van Doorn, Leni [2 ]
Cox, Juul M. [3 ]
Daloul, Alaa [1 ]
Ettafahi, Halima [1 ]
Hoop, Esther Oomen-de [2 ]
Zietse, Michiel [1 ]
Bos, Monique E. M. M. [2 ]
Koch, Birgit C. P. [1 ]
van Leeuwen, Roelof W. F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Hosp Pharm, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Maasstad Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, Maasstad Lab, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS; ANTIHISTAMINES; PRESCRIPTION; FEASIBILITY; PROPHYLAXIS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1200/OP.24.00110
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSEPremedication, including a histamine-1 receptor (H1) antagonist, is recommended to all patients treated with paclitaxel chemotherapy to reduce the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). However, the scientific basis for this premedication is not robust, which provides opportunities for optimization. Substitution of intravenously administered first-generation H1 antagonist for orally administered second-generation H1 antagonist could reduce side effects, and improve efficiency and sustainability. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of substituting intravenous clemastine for oral cetirizine as prophylaxis for paclitaxel-induced HSRs.METHODSThis single-center, prospective, noninferiority study compares a historic cohort receiving a premedication regimen with intravenous clemastine to a prospective cohort receiving oral cetirizine. Primary end point of the study is HSR grade >= 3. The difference in incidence was calculated together with the 90% CI. We determined that the two-sided 90% CI of HSR grade >= 3 incidence in the oral cetirizine cohort should not be more than 4% higher (ie, the noninferiority margin) compared with the intravenous clemastine cohort.RESULTSTwo hundred and twelve patients were included in the oral cetirizine cohort (June 2022 and May 2023) and 183 in the intravenous clemastine cohort. HSR grade >= 3 incidence was 1.6% (n = 3) in the intravenous clemastine cohort and 0.5% (n = 1) in the oral cetirizine cohort, resulting in a difference of -1.2% (90% CI, -3.4 to 1.1).CONCLUSIONPremedication containing oral cetirizine is as safe as premedication containing intravenous clemastine in preventing paclitaxel-induced HSR grade >= 3. These findings could contribute to optimization of care for patients and improve efficiency and sustainability. Oral cetirizine is a nonsedative, easy, and effective alternative for IV antihistamines before paclitaxel.
引用
收藏
页码:1243 / 1251
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Calculate Sample Size Needed to Compare 2 Proportions: 2-Sample Non-Inferiority or Superiority
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
[3]   A Cost-Effectiveness Study Comparing Ready-to-Administer and Traditional Vial-and-Syringe Method for Opioids [J].
Arora, Prachi ;
Muehrcke, Maria ;
Hertig, John .
PAIN AND THERAPY, 2022, 11 (03) :937-950
[4]  
Asero R, 2010, EUR ANN ALLERGY CLIN, V42, P174
[5]   Prospective Study Testing a Simplified Paclitaxel Premedication Regimen in Patients with Early Breast Cancer [J].
Barroso-Sousa, Romualdo ;
Vaz-Luis, Ines ;
Di Meglio, Antonio ;
Hu, Jiani ;
Li, Tianyu ;
Rees, Rebecca ;
Sinclair, Natalie ;
Milisits, Lindsey ;
Leone, Jose Pablo ;
Constantine, Michael ;
Faggen, Meredith ;
Briccetti, Frederick ;
Block, Caroline ;
Partridge, Ann ;
Burstein, Harold ;
Waks, Adrienne G. ;
Tayob, Nabihah ;
Trippa, Lorenzo ;
Tolaney, Sara M. ;
Hassett, Michael J. ;
Winer, Eric P. ;
Lin, Nancy U. .
ONCOLOGIST, 2021, 26 (11) :927-933
[6]   A randomized double-blind feasibility study comparing cetirizine and diphenhydramine in the prevention of paclitaxel-associated infusion-related reactions: the PREMED-F1 study [J].
Beaucage-Charron, Johannie ;
Gaudet, Laurence ;
Lamothe, Sarah ;
Pelletier, Cloe ;
Pepin, Anne-Sophie ;
Roy, Valerie ;
Charpentier, Frederic ;
Lordkipanidze, Marie ;
Projean, Denis ;
Bouchard, Philippe ;
Picard, Matthieu .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (04) :3389-3399
[7]   Stopping paclitaxel premedication after two doses in patients not experiencing a previous infusion hypersensitivity reaction [J].
Berger, Michael J. ;
Vargo, Craig ;
Vincent, Mary ;
Shaver, Katy ;
Phillips, Gary ;
Layman, Rachel ;
Macrae, Erin ;
Mrozek, Ewa ;
Ramaswamy, Bhuvaneswari ;
Wesolowski, Robert ;
Shapiro, Charles L. ;
Lustberg, Maryam B. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (07) :2019-2024
[8]   Feasibility of stopping paclitaxel premedication after two doses in patients not experiencing a previous infusion hypersensitivity reaction [J].
Berger, Michael J. ;
Dunlea, Leslie J. ;
Rettig, Amy E. ;
Lustberg, Maryam B. ;
Phillips, Gary S. ;
Shapiro, Charles L. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (09) :1991-1997
[9]   Short-course intravenous prophylaxis for paclitaxel-related hypersensitivity reactions [J].
Bookman, MA ;
Kloth, DD ;
Kover, PE ;
Smolinski, S ;
Ozols, RF .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (06) :611-614
[10]   Tapering and discontinuation of glucocorticoid prophylaxis during prolonged weekly to biweekly paclitaxel administration [J].
Braverman, AS ;
Rao, S ;
Salvatti, ME ;
Adamson, B ;
McManus, M ;
Pierre, S .
CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 51 (2-3) :116-119