Qualitative Research From Grounded Theory to Build a Scientific Framework on the Researcher's Epistemic Competence

被引:1
作者
Deroncele-Acosta, Angel [1 ]
Gross-Tur, Ramiro [2 ]
Bellido-Valdiviezo, Omar [1 ]
Lopez-Mustelier, Rosendo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ San Ignacio Loyola, Escuela Postgrad, Lima, Peru
[2] Univ Oriente, Santiago De Cuba, Cuba
关键词
qualitative research; grounded theory; epistemic competence; conceptual understanding; conceptual framework; concept formation; knowledge building; science education; conceptual change; personal epistemology; virtue epistemology; epistemic emotions; CONCEPTUAL CHANGE; PERSONAL EPISTEMOLOGY; BELIEFS; SCIENCE; COGNITION; PHILOSOPHY; REFLECTION; KNOWLEDGE; EMOTIONS; VIRTUES;
D O I
10.1177/16094069241284218
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The Epistemic Competence of the Researcher is a critical success factor for ethical, rigorous, and creative research performance, but it requires a deep epistemological and methodological mastery, however, the current scientific literature has not yet achieved a conceptual arrangement, that allows researchers and educators to have a comprehensive theoretical framework for a holistic understanding of this competence. The objective of this study was to build a comprehensive theory on the epistemic competence of the researcher. A qualitative approach was used, deploying an open interview and the grounded theory method. Ten experts in social science didactics from 7 Latin American universities and 3 Spanish universities participated. The interviews were processed manually and with the support of ATLAS.TI software, finding 23 emerging categories that were contrasted with the results of a term co-occurrence network of 6081 studies imported from Scopus. From the cross-check of empirical and theoretical results, the following concepts were selected to coincide. Finally, the theoretical framework established was made up of the following concepts: 1.- knowledge building and conceptual change, 2.- epistemological beliefs, 3.- concept mapping and knowledge creation, 4.- conceptual understanding, 5.- conceptual framework, 6.- concept formation, 7.- epistemic beliefs, 8.- science education (learning science and science teaching) 9.- cognitive complexity, 10.- personal epistemology, 11.- virtue epistemology, 12.- formal logic, 13.- epistemic cognition, 14.- nature of science, 15.- epistemic emotions. A proposal for teaching and learning science from this epistemic perspective is established. Future studies should continue to explore the concepts and categories that this work leaves open.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Acosta AD, 2022, REV UNIV SOC, V14, P102
[2]   VIRTUE AS A SKILL [J].
ANNAS, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 1995, 3 (02) :227-243
[3]  
Aronson O., 2010, Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, V2, P32, DOI [10.1093/jrls/2.1.32, DOI 10.1093/JRLS/2.1.32]
[4]  
Bahçivan E, 2019, INT J EDUC MATH SCI, V7, P271
[5]   The future in the social sciences [J].
Bainbridge, WS .
FUTURES, 2003, 35 (06) :633-650
[6]  
Brown E., 2023, Methodological Innovations, V16, P329, DOI [10.1177/20597991231202887, DOI 10.1177/20597991231202887]
[7]   Changing Teachers' Epistemic Cognition: A New Conceptual Framework for Epistemic Reflexivity [J].
Brownlee, Jo Lunn ;
Ferguson, Leila E. ;
Ryan, Mary .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2017, 52 (04) :242-252
[8]   Peer sociocognitive interaction according to symmetry and asymmetry of epistemic competence [J].
Castellaro, Mariano ;
Roselli, Nestor .
REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA PUCP, 2018, 36 (01) :333-365
[9]   Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology [J].
Chinn, Clark A. ;
Buckland, Luke A. ;
Samarapungavan, Ala .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 46 (03) :141-167
[10]   BUILDING THEORY ABOUT THEORY BUILDING: WHAT CONSTITUTES A THEORETICAL CONTRIBUTION? [J].
Corley, Kevin G. ;
Gioia, Dennis A. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2011, 36 (01) :12-32