Kidney re-transplantation in the ipsilateral iliac fossa: a surgeon's perspective on perioperative outcome

被引:0
作者
Tessmer, Philipp [1 ]
Weigle, Clara A. [1 ]
Meyer, Anna [1 ]
Wiemann, Bengt A. [1 ]
Gwinner, Wilfried [2 ]
Einecke, Gunilla [2 ,3 ]
Klempnauer, Juergen [1 ]
Vondran, Florian W. R. [1 ,4 ]
Richter, Nicolas [1 ]
Oldhafer, Felix [1 ,4 ]
Beetz, Oliver [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplant Surg, Hannover, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Nephrol & Hypertens, Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Dept Nephrol & Endocrinol, Gottingen, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp RWTH Aachen, Dept Gen Visceral Pediat & Transplant Surg, Aachen, Germany
关键词
graft failure; ipsilateral renal re-transplantation; iterative kidney transplantation; kidney re-transplantation; surgical complications in kidney re-transplantation; CRITERIA DECEASED DONORS; SINGLE-CENTER; UNITED-STATES; RISK-FACTORS; 3RD; RETRANSPLANTATION; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; RECIPIENTS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1093/ckj/sfae271
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Compared with primary transplantation, ipsilateral renal re-transplantation is associated with an increased risk of surgical complications and inferior graft outcomes. This study investigates whether an ipsilateral re-transplantation approach per se is an independent risk factor for surgical complications and early graft loss.Methods In this retrospective, single-centre analysis, surgical complications and early graft outcomes of ipsilateral kidney re-transplantations from January 2007 to December 2017 were compared with primary transplantations and contralateral re-transplantations. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for surgical complications requiring surgical revision and graft loss within the first year after transplantation.Results Of the 1489 kidney transplantations, 51 were ipsilateral, 159 were contralateral re-transplantations and 1279 were primary transplantations. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the ipsilateral and contralateral re-transplant recipients except for current and highest panel reactive antibody levels. Major complications requiring surgical revision were significantly more frequent in ipsilateral re-transplantations (P = .010) than in primary transplantations but did not differ between ipsilateral and contralateral re-transplantations (P = .217). Graft loss within the first year after transplant was 15.7% in the ipsilateral versus 8.8% in the contralateral re-transplant group (P = .163) versus 6.4% in the primary transplantation group (P = .009). In a multivariate regression model, ipsilateral re-transplantation was not identified as an independent risk factor for complications requiring surgical revision or first-year graft loss.Conclusions Ipsilateral renal re-transplantation is not a risk factor for inferior outcomes. Graft implantation into a pre-transplanted iliac fossa is a feasible and valid therapeutic option. Graphical Abstract
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]  
GREGOIR W, 1962, Acta Urol Belg, V30, P286
[12]   Equivalent outcomes with primary and retransplantation in African-American deceased-donor renal allograft recipients [J].
Gruber, Scott A. ;
Brown, Kristian L. ;
El-Amm, Jose M. ;
Singh, Atul ;
Mehta, Kalyani ;
Morawski, Katherina ;
Cincotta, Elizabeth ;
Nehlsen-Cannarella, Sandra ;
Losanoff, Julian E. ;
West, Miguel S. ;
Doshi, Mona D. .
SURGERY, 2009, 146 (04) :646-653
[13]  
Gutierrez Banos J. L., 2005, Archivos Espanoles de Urologia, V58, P121
[14]   A single-center study of the technical aspects and outcome of third and subsequent renal transplants [J].
Hagan, C ;
Hickey, DP ;
Little, DM .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (10) :1687-1691
[15]   Risk Factors for Retransplant Kidney Recipients: Relisting and Outcomes From Patients' Primary Transplant [J].
Heaphy, E. L. G. ;
Poggio, E. D. ;
Flechner, S. M. ;
Goldfarb, D. A. ;
Askar, M. ;
Fatica, R. ;
Srinivas, T. R. ;
Schold, J. D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 (06) :1356-1367
[16]   Risks and Benefits of Preemptive Second Kidney Transplantation [J].
Johnston, Olwyn ;
Rose, Caren L. ;
Gill, Jagbir S. ;
Gill, John S. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 95 (05) :705-710
[17]   Successful third kidney transplantation with intensive immunosuppression in a highly sensitized recipient [J].
Kawase, T. ;
Tojimbara, T. ;
Niki, R. ;
Akamatsu, M. ;
Nakajima, I. ;
Fuchinoue, S. ;
Agishi, T. ;
Teraoka, S. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (07) :2428-2430
[18]   Single-center experience with third and fourth kidney transplants [J].
Kienzl-Wagner, Katrin ;
Mark, Walter ;
Maglione, Manuel ;
Brandacher, Gerald ;
Oellinger, Robert ;
Margreiter, Raimund ;
Pratschke, Johann ;
Boesmueller, Claudia .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 24 (08) :780-786
[19]   Kidney Transplantation Using Expanded-Criteria Deceased Donors: A Comparison With Ideal Deceased Donors and Non-Expanded-Criteria Deceased Donors [J].
Ko, K. J. ;
Kim, Y. H. ;
Kwon, K. H. ;
Kim, M. H. ;
Jun, K. W. ;
Hwang, J. K. ;
Kim, S. D. ;
Park, S. C. ;
Kim, J. I. ;
Yun, S. S. ;
Moon, I. S. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 50 (10) :3222-3227
[20]   Surgical complications after kidney transplantation: different impacts of immunosuppression, graft function, patient variables, and surgical performance [J].
Koch, Martina ;
Kantas, Alexandros ;
Ramcke, Katja ;
Drabik, Anna I. ;
Nashan, Bjoern .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 29 (03) :252-260