Reliability and validity of the German version of the Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale

被引:0
|
作者
Podzimek, Jiri [1 ]
Jecker, Peter [1 ]
Koscielny, Sven [2 ]
Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando [2 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Bad Salzungen GmbH, Klin HNO & Plast Kopf Hals Chirurg, Lindigallee 3, D-36433 Bad Salzungen, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Jena, HNO, Jena, Germany
关键词
Globus; Fragebogen; Reliabilit & auml; t; Validit & auml; Reflux; globus; questionnaire; reliability; validity; reflux; GLOBUS PHARYNGEUS; DIAGNOSIS; ETIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1055/a-2362-0465
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background Many patients who consult the ENT doctor suffer from globus sensation, as a term for a multifactorial symptom description. It is particularly important during initial consultation to take the often-sensitive patients seriously and to offer a structured diagnostic clarification. Today, there is a lack of a screening tool in everyday clinical practice that can be used to differentiate the globus sensations more closely and assess their severity Objectives The reliability and validity of the German version of the Glasgow Edinburgh Throat Scale (GETS) were examined. Materials und Methods The original GETS questionnaire was translated into German (GETS-G) and completed by 60 patients with globus sensation (>3 months) in a prospective observational study. All patients received a clinical examination a sonography of the neck. In patients without an identifiable organic cause, a pH monitoring was carried out. Results A local organic cause for the globus sensation was found in 30 patients (50%). In addition, reflux was detected in 24 patients (40%) using pH monitoring. No cause could be determined in only 6 patients (10%). According to the overall score (Q1-Q12), there was no significant difference between these three groups. The Cronbach's alpha for assessing reliability was 0.88 in the 12-item analysis. Principal component analysis yielded a globus scale, dysphagia scale and a chronic pharyngeal irritation scale. Conclusions The GETS-G showed high reliability and validity, which justifies its use in patients with globus sensation in German-speaking countries and may lead to a better assessment of the severity of this symptom.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 241
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF A TURKISH VERSION OF THE PASSIONATE LOVE SCALE
    Yildirim, Filiz
    Hablemitoglu, Sengul
    Barnett, Rosemary V.
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2014, 42 (04): : 673 - 684
  • [22] Reliability and validity of the Mandarin version of the Trust in Nurses Scale
    Liu, Jujuan
    Zheng, Zhihui
    Ge, Li
    Huang, Yufeng
    Yang, Qingqing
    Chen, Yubei
    Li, Xiaohong
    Pang, Shuqin
    Li, Xia
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30 (05) : 1366 - 1375
  • [23] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Burden Assessment Scale
    Aydemir, Omer
    Dikici, Didem Suculluoglu
    Akdeniz, Fatma
    Kalayci, Fatma
    NOROPSIKIYATRI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2012, 49 (04): : 276 - 280
  • [24] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Recovery Assessment Scale
    Guler, Cansu
    Gurkan, Ayca
    DUSUNEN ADAM-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 32 (04) : 309 - 319
  • [25] The Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Version of the Composite Abuse Scale
    Alhalal, Eman
    Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn
    Wong, Carol
    Albuhairan, Fadia
    VIOLENCE AND VICTIMS, 2019, 34 (01) : 3 - 27
  • [26] Reliability and validity of Turkish version of the Individualised Care Scale
    Acaroglu, Rengin
    Suhonen, Riitta
    Sendir, Merdiye
    Kaya, Hatice
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2011, 20 (1-2) : 136 - 145
  • [27] The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Berkeley Expressivity Scale
    Akin, Ahmet
    2ND WORLD CONFERENCE ON PSYCHOLOGY, COUNSELLING AND GUIDANCE-2011, 2011, 30
  • [28] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Impaired Control Scale
    Won, Sung-Doo
    Han, Changwoo
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 15 (09) : 852 - 860
  • [29] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Mentalization Scale (MentS)
    Kaya, Zulal Torenli
    Alpay, Emre Han
    Yeniguc, Serif Turkkal
    Bilgili, Gamze Ozcurumez
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2023, 34 (02) : 118 - 124
  • [30] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the epilepsy stigma scale
    Huang, Kailing
    Wu, Yuanxia
    He, Qiang
    Yang, Haojun
    Du, Yangsa
    Xiao, Bo
    Feng, Li
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2022, 127