Optimizing parameter learning and calibration in an integrated hydrological model: Impact of observation length and information

被引:1
作者
Jiang, Peishi [1 ,2 ]
Shuai, Pin [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Alexander Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Xingyuan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Atmospher Climate & Earth Sci Div, Richland, WA 99354 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Utah Water Res Lab, Logan, UT 84321 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Jackson Sch Geosci, Bur Econ Geol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
Watershed modeling; Parameter estimation; Observation length; Observation information; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; PERFORMANCE; FLOW; UNCERTAINTY; SENSITIVITY; ENTROPY; SERIES; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131889
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Integrated hydrological modeling is gaining popularity due to its mechanistic representation of the surface and subsurface processes. However, estimating the parameters of such process-based models can be computationally expensive if careful consideration is not given to the length of streamflow observations used during model calibration. Here we evaluate the influence of the calibration period, the role of streamflow information content, and the gage location in parameter learning and calibration of a fully integrated hydrological model, the Advanced Terrestrial Simulator (ATS). We conducted the study at the Upper Neversink River Watershed within the Delaware River Basin, where streamflow observations are available at 11 gages with varying record lengths. We leveraged a recently proposed knowledge-informed deep learning technique for parameter estimation. To assess the impact of observation period and gage location, model parameters were learned on scenarios using different chunks of streamflow observations, including (1) using only one year or consecutive multiple years of streamflow observations at the watershed outlet and (2) using one shared year of observations at each of the sub-catchment gages, with the period from 1991-10-01 through 1999-09-30 as the overall calibration period. Using the estimated parameters, ATS was rerun for each scenario and evaluated on a subsequent period from 1999-10-01 through 2002-09-30. Results show that the basin outlet discharge prediction is mostly improved when using at least four years of observations for parameter estimation. Further, the performance of the calibrated ATS run correlates with the information content of the observed streamflows, suggesting that the information-theoretic metrics could be indicators for selecting the observation period for parameter estimation. Finally, we find that observations from an informative gage can be used in learning parameters to predict the streamflow at a nearby gage, which would potentially lower the computational expense by reducing the watershed domain used in calibration. Our success underscores the potential of using information theory to achieve robust model parameter estimation on a reduced computational budget.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Using an ensemble smoother to evaluate parameter uncertainty of an integrated hydrological model of Yanqi basin
    Li, Ning
    McLaughlin, Dennis
    Kinzelbach, Wolfgang
    Li, WenPeng
    Dong, XinGuang
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 529 : 146 - 158
  • [22] Investigating the impact of calibration timescales on streamflow simulation, parameter sensitivity and model performance for Indian catchments
    Setti, Sridhara
    Barik, Kamal Kumar
    Merz, Bruno
    Agarwal, Ankit
    Rathinasamy, Maheswaran
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2022, 67 (05): : 661 - 675
  • [23] Impact of Length of Dataset on Streamflow Calibration Parameters and Performance of APEX Model
    Nelson, Amanda M.
    Moriasi, Daniel N.
    Talebizadeh, Mansour
    Steiner, Jean L.
    Confesor, Remegio B.
    Gowda, Prasanna H.
    Starks, Patrick J.
    Tadesse, Haile
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2017, 53 (05): : 1164 - 1177
  • [24] Integrating different types of information into hydrological model parameter estimation: Application to ungauged catchments and land use scenario analysis
    Bulygina, Nataliya
    Ballard, Caroline
    McIntyre, Neil
    O'Donnell, Greg
    Wheater, Howard
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2012, 48
  • [25] Comparing calibration strategies of a conceptual snow hydrology model and their impact on model performance and parameter identifiability
    Nemri, Saida
    Kinnard, Christophe
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 582
  • [26] Impact Assessment of Coupling Mode of Hydrological Model and Machine Learning Model on Runoff Simulation: A Case of Washington
    Zhang, Junqi
    Li, Jing
    Zhao, Huiyizhe
    Wang, Wen
    Lv, Na
    Zhang, Bowen
    Liu, Yue
    Yang, Xinyu
    Guo, Mengjing
    Dong, Yuhao
    ATMOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (12)
  • [27] Impact of deep learning-driven precipitation corrected data using near real-time satellite-based observations and model forecast in an integrated hydrological model
    Yousefi, Kaveh Patakchi
    Belleflamme, Alexandre
    Goergen, Klaus
    Kollet, Stefan
    FRONTIERS IN WATER, 2024, 6
  • [28] Impact of Watershed Subdivision and Soil Data Resolution on SWAT Model Calibration and Parameter Uncertainty1
    Kumar, Sanjiv
    Merwade, Venkatesh
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2009, 45 (05): : 1179 - 1196
  • [29] A physical process and machine learning combined hydrological model for daily streamflow simulations of large watersheds with limited observation data
    Yang, Shuyu
    Yang, Dawen
    Chen, Jinsong
    Santisirisomboon, Jerasorn
    Lu, Weiwei
    Zhao, Baoxu
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 590
  • [30] Effects of single- and multi-site calibration strategies on hydrological model performance and parameter sensitivity of large-scale semi-arid and semi-humid watersheds
    Wu, Lei
    Liu, Xia
    Yang, Zhi
    Yu, Yang
    Ma, Xiaoyi
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2022, 36 (06)