Optimizing parameter learning and calibration in an integrated hydrological model: Impact of observation length and information

被引:1
作者
Jiang, Peishi [1 ,2 ]
Shuai, Pin [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Alexander Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Xingyuan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Atmospher Climate & Earth Sci Div, Richland, WA 99354 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Utah Water Res Lab, Logan, UT 84321 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Jackson Sch Geosci, Bur Econ Geol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
Watershed modeling; Parameter estimation; Observation length; Observation information; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; PERFORMANCE; FLOW; UNCERTAINTY; SENSITIVITY; ENTROPY; SERIES; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131889
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Integrated hydrological modeling is gaining popularity due to its mechanistic representation of the surface and subsurface processes. However, estimating the parameters of such process-based models can be computationally expensive if careful consideration is not given to the length of streamflow observations used during model calibration. Here we evaluate the influence of the calibration period, the role of streamflow information content, and the gage location in parameter learning and calibration of a fully integrated hydrological model, the Advanced Terrestrial Simulator (ATS). We conducted the study at the Upper Neversink River Watershed within the Delaware River Basin, where streamflow observations are available at 11 gages with varying record lengths. We leveraged a recently proposed knowledge-informed deep learning technique for parameter estimation. To assess the impact of observation period and gage location, model parameters were learned on scenarios using different chunks of streamflow observations, including (1) using only one year or consecutive multiple years of streamflow observations at the watershed outlet and (2) using one shared year of observations at each of the sub-catchment gages, with the period from 1991-10-01 through 1999-09-30 as the overall calibration period. Using the estimated parameters, ATS was rerun for each scenario and evaluated on a subsequent period from 1999-10-01 through 2002-09-30. Results show that the basin outlet discharge prediction is mostly improved when using at least four years of observations for parameter estimation. Further, the performance of the calibrated ATS run correlates with the information content of the observed streamflows, suggesting that the information-theoretic metrics could be indicators for selecting the observation period for parameter estimation. Finally, we find that observations from an informative gage can be used in learning parameters to predict the streamflow at a nearby gage, which would potentially lower the computational expense by reducing the watershed domain used in calibration. Our success underscores the potential of using information theory to achieve robust model parameter estimation on a reduced computational budget.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Impact of Dataset Size on the Signature-Based Calibration of a Hydrological Model
    Mohammed, Safa A.
    Solomatine, Dimitri P.
    Hrachowitz, Markus
    Hamouda, Mohamed A.
    WATER, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [2] Multiobjective Automatic Parameter Calibration of a Hydrological Model
    Jung, Donghwi
    Choi, Young Hwan
    Kim, Joong Hoon
    WATER, 2017, 9 (03)
  • [3] Effect of length of the observed dataset on the calibration of a distributed hydrological model
    Cui, Xingqi
    Sun, Wenchao
    Teng, Jianbiao
    Song, Hao
    Yao, Xiaolei
    REMOTE SENSING AND GIS FOR HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES, 2015, 368 : 305 - 311
  • [4] Optimizing hydrological consistency by incorporating hydrological signatures into model calibration objectives
    Shafii, Mahyar
    Tolson, Bryan A.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2015, 51 (05) : 3796 - 3814
  • [5] Effect of data length, spin-up period and spatial model resolution on fully distributed hydrological model calibration in the Moselle basin
    Ekmekcioglu, Omer
    Demirel, Mehmet Cuneyd
    Booij, Martijn J.
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, 2022, 67 (05) : 759 - 772
  • [6] Exploiting the use of physical information for the calibration of a lumped hydrological model
    Manfreda, Salvatore
    Mita, Leonardo
    Dal Sasso, Silvano Fortunato
    Samela, Caterina
    Mancusi, Leonardo
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2018, 32 (10) : 1420 - 1433
  • [7] Concepts of Information Content and Likelihood in Parameter Calibration for Hydrological Simulation Models
    Beven, Keith
    Smith, Paul
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2015, 20 (01)
  • [8] Improvement of hydrological model calibration by selecting multiple parameter ranges
    Wu, Qiaofeng
    Liu, Shuguang
    Cai, Yi
    Li, Xinjian
    Jiang, Yangming
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2017, 21 (01) : 393 - 407
  • [9] Optimal Hydrological Model Calibration Strategy for Climate Change Impact Studies
    Berube, Samuel
    Brissette, Francois
    Arsenault, Richard
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2022, 27 (03)
  • [10] Responses of hydrological model equifinality, uncertainty, and performance to multi-objective parameter calibration
    Her, Younggu
    Seong, Chounghyun
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2018, 20 (04) : 864 - 885