Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With an Imageless, Second-Generation Robotic System

被引:0
|
作者
Cochrane, Niall H. [1 ]
Kim, Billy I. [1 ]
Stauffer, Taylor P. [1 ]
Hallows, Rhett K. [1 ]
Urish, Kenneth L. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Alba, Jaime A. Carvajal [6 ]
Seyler, Thorsten M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Magee Womens Hosp, Ctr Bone & Joint,Arthrit & Arthroplasty Design Gr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Clin & Translat Sci Inst, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Miami Hlth Syst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Miami, FL USA
关键词
revision knee arthroplasty; robotics; second-generation; imageless; 90-day outcomes; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; UNITED-STATES; REPLACEMENT; READMISSION; DISCHARGE; TRENDS; RATES; TKA;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.018
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is increasingly used in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), with imageless systems recently receiving Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. However, there remains a paucity of literature on the use of robotic assistance in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This paper describes the imageless surgical technique for robotic revision TKA using a second-generation robotic system and details both intraoperative and 90-day outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective review of 115 robotic revision TKAs from March 2021 to May 2023 at 3 tertiary academic centers. Patient demographics, perioperative surgical data, and 90-day outcomes were collected. Pain and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores preoperatively and postoperatively were recorded. All-cause reoperations at the final follow-up were detailed. The mean patient age was 65 years (range, 43 to 88), and 58% were women. The mean follow-up time was 13 months (range, 3 to 51). Results: The most common indications for rTKA were instability (n = 37, 32%) and aseptic loosening (n = 42, 37%). There were 83 rTKAs to a posterior-stabilized liner, 22 to a varus-valgus constrained liner, and 5 to a hinged construct. The median polyethylene size was 11 (interquartile range, 10 to 13), and 93% of patients had their joint line restored within 5 millimeters of the native contralateral knee. Within the 90-day postoperative window, there were 8 emergency department visits and 2 readmissions. At the final follow-up, there were 5 reoperations and 2 manipulations under anesthesia. There were 4 patients who required irrigation and debridement after superficial wound dehiscence, and one had an arthrotomy disruption after a fall. Conclusions: This review demonstrates favorable intraoperative and 90-day outcomes and suggests that imageless robotic surgery is a promising modality in rTKA. Further studies comparing the longitudinal outcomes after robotic and conventional rTKA are warranted. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S276 / S280
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty are as good as a primary total knee arthroplasty
    Lim, Jason Beng Teck
    Pang, Hee Nee
    Tay, Keng Jin Darren
    Chia, Shi-lu
    Lo, Ngai Nung
    Yeo, Seng Jin
    KNEE, 2019, 26 (04) : 847 - 852
  • [42] Robotic-arm-assisted conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty
    Magruder, Matthew L.
    Mcclure, Tanner
    Marchand, Kevin
    Mont, Michael A.
    Marchand, Robert C.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 52 : 119 - 123
  • [43] Robotic arm- assisted conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty
    Mancino, F.
    Fontalis, A.
    Grandhi, T. S. P.
    Magan, A.
    Plastow, R.
    Kayani, B.
    Haddad, F. S.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2024, 106B (07) : 680 - 687
  • [44] Revision of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Versus Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Craik, Johnathan D.
    El Shafie, Sherif A.
    Singh, Vinay K.
    Twyman, Roy S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (04) : 592 - 594
  • [45] Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Update
    Pipino, Gennaro
    Giai Via, Alessio
    Ratano, Marco
    Spoliti, Marco
    Lanzetti, Riccardo Maria
    Oliva, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2024, 14 (06):
  • [46] Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Has Similar Rates of Prosthetic Noise Generation as Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Cozzarelli, Nicholas F.
    Khan, Irfan A.
    Imam, Nareena
    Klein, Gregg R.
    Levine, Harlan
    Seidenstein, Ari
    Zaid, Musa B.
    Lonner, Jess H.
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2023, 23
  • [47] Inferior outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty compared with primary total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Jin Kyu
    Kim, Hyun Jung
    Park, Jae Ok
    Yang, Jae-Hyuk
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2018, 26 (11) : 3403 - 3418
  • [48] Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Khlopas, Anton
    Sodhi, Nipun
    Sultan, Assem A.
    Chughtai, Morad
    Molloy, Robert M.
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (07) : 2002 - 2006
  • [49] Imageless robotic handpiece-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a learning curve analysis of surgical time and alignment accuracy
    Savov, Peter
    Tuecking, Lars-Rene
    Windhagen, Henning
    Ehmig, Jonathan
    Ettinger, Max
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2021, 141 (12) : 2119 - 2128
  • [50] Conversion of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty to Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Lachance, Andrew D.
    Steika, Roman
    Lutton, Jeffrey
    Austin, David
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2023, 23