Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With an Imageless, Second-Generation Robotic System

被引:0
|
作者
Cochrane, Niall H. [1 ]
Kim, Billy I. [1 ]
Stauffer, Taylor P. [1 ]
Hallows, Rhett K. [1 ]
Urish, Kenneth L. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Alba, Jaime A. Carvajal [6 ]
Seyler, Thorsten M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Magee Womens Hosp, Ctr Bone & Joint,Arthrit & Arthroplasty Design Gr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Clin & Translat Sci Inst, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Miami Hlth Syst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Miami, FL USA
关键词
revision knee arthroplasty; robotics; second-generation; imageless; 90-day outcomes; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; UNITED-STATES; REPLACEMENT; READMISSION; DISCHARGE; TRENDS; RATES; TKA;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.018
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is increasingly used in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), with imageless systems recently receiving Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. However, there remains a paucity of literature on the use of robotic assistance in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This paper describes the imageless surgical technique for robotic revision TKA using a second-generation robotic system and details both intraoperative and 90-day outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective review of 115 robotic revision TKAs from March 2021 to May 2023 at 3 tertiary academic centers. Patient demographics, perioperative surgical data, and 90-day outcomes were collected. Pain and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores preoperatively and postoperatively were recorded. All-cause reoperations at the final follow-up were detailed. The mean patient age was 65 years (range, 43 to 88), and 58% were women. The mean follow-up time was 13 months (range, 3 to 51). Results: The most common indications for rTKA were instability (n = 37, 32%) and aseptic loosening (n = 42, 37%). There were 83 rTKAs to a posterior-stabilized liner, 22 to a varus-valgus constrained liner, and 5 to a hinged construct. The median polyethylene size was 11 (interquartile range, 10 to 13), and 93% of patients had their joint line restored within 5 millimeters of the native contralateral knee. Within the 90-day postoperative window, there were 8 emergency department visits and 2 readmissions. At the final follow-up, there were 5 reoperations and 2 manipulations under anesthesia. There were 4 patients who required irrigation and debridement after superficial wound dehiscence, and one had an arthrotomy disruption after a fall. Conclusions: This review demonstrates favorable intraoperative and 90-day outcomes and suggests that imageless robotic surgery is a promising modality in rTKA. Further studies comparing the longitudinal outcomes after robotic and conventional rTKA are warranted. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S276 / S280
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Arthrofibrosis
    Rutherford, Richard W.
    Jennings, Jason M.
    Levy, Daniel L.
    Parisi, Thomas J.
    Martin, J. Ryan
    Dennis, Douglas A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (07) : S177 - S181
  • [32] Comparing an imageless hand-held robotic-assisted system versus conventional technique for component positioning and early clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty
    Hasegawa, Masahiro
    Hattori, Yoshio
    Naito, Yohei
    Tone, Shine
    Sudo, Akihiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2024, 20 (01)
  • [33] Alternatives to revision total knee arthroplasty
    Jones, R. E.
    Russell, R. D.
    Huo, M. H.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2012, 94B (11): : 137 - 140
  • [34] Trends in Revenue and Cost for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Ashkenazi, Itay
    Christensen, Thomas
    Ward, Spencer A.
    Bosco, Joseph A.
    Lajam, Claudette M.
    Slover, James
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (07) : S97 - S102
  • [35] Ligament Balancing and Constraint in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Crawford, David A.
    Lombardi, Adolph V., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (13) : 1382 - 1387
  • [36] National Obesity Trends in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Odum, Susan M.
    Van Doren, Bryce A.
    Springer, Bryan D.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (09) : S136 - S139
  • [37] Short Term Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Dieterich, James D.
    Fields, Adam C.
    Moucha, Calin S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (11) : 2163 - 2166
  • [38] The use of imageless navigation to quantify cutting error in total knee arthroplasty
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    Meftah, Morteza
    Marwin, Scott E.
    Zabat, Michelle A.
    Muir, Jeffrey M.
    Lamb, Iain R.
    KNEE SURGERY & RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 33 (01)
  • [39] Imageless Computer Navigation Reduces 5-Year All-Cause Revision Rates After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Varshneya, Kunal
    Hong, Cierra S.
    Tyagi, Vineet
    Thiele, Ramon A. Ruberte
    Huddleston, James I., III
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (06) : S211 - S215
  • [40] The lifetime risk of revision following total knee arthroplasty
    Stone, B.
    Nugent, M.
    Young, SW.
    Frampton, C.
    Hooper, G. J.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2022, 104B (02) : 235 - 241