Consumer acceptance of mycelium as protein source

被引:0
作者
Fischer, Arnout R. H. [1 ]
Hilboesen, Owen [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Consumer behaviour; Alternative protein; Mycelium; Disgust; Consumer perception; Naturalness; FOOD; DISGUST; NANOTECHNOLOGY; VALIDATION; RISK; INFORMATION; PERCEPTIONS; SENSITIVITY; CONSUMPTION; JUDGMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105304
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The mycelium of mushroom-forming fungi represents an underappreciated protein source that can be cultivated on agricultural rest-streams and industrially prepared substrates. Consumer food options include unprocessed fresh mycelium or products derived from purified mycelium protein. Both the use of rest streams and the association of fresh mycelia with moulds can create a tension between potentially disgusting and naturalness cues. The current paper investigates this tension in a 3 (substrate: manure, wood, glucose) by 3 (level of processing: unprocessed mycelium cake, purified mycelium protein powder, burger from mycelium protein) experimental survey (N = 449). Results show that substrate source has limited impact on disgust but a slightly greater influence on perceived naturalness. Level of processing has a significant effect on both disgust and naturalness. As expected, social value and attitude based on benefit-risk trade-off inform acceptance. While effects of disgust and naturalness on benefit-risk attitude and social value balance each other, a direct effect of disgust on acceptance remains, underscoring the pivotal role of disgust in shaping consumer acceptance. This suggests for mycelium producers there is freedom of choice of substrate as it has limited effect on consumer acceptance.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Consumer Acceptance of Food with Claims: Studies on Consumer Protection
    Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica
    ERNAHRUNGS UMSCHAU, 2010, 57 (05): : 238 - 242
  • [42] Is There a Potential US Market for Seaweed-Based Products? A Framed Field Experiment on Consumer Acceptance
    Li, Tongzhe
    Ahsanuzzaman
    Messer, Kent D.
    MARINE RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2021, 36 (03) : 255 - 268
  • [43] Overcoming barriers to consumer acceptance of 3D-printed foods in the food service sector
    Ross, Megan M.
    Collins, Alan M.
    McCarthy, Mary B.
    Kelly, Alan L.
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2022, 100
  • [44] Consumer acceptance and preference for brown rice -A mixed-method qualitative study from Nepal
    Gyawali, Pratiksha
    Tamrakar, Dipesh
    Shrestha, Abha
    Shrestha, Himal
    Karmacharya, Sanju
    Bhattarai, Sanju
    Bhandari, Niroj
    Malik, Vasanti
    Mattei, Josiemer
    Spiegelman, Donna
    Shrestha, Archana
    FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION, 2022, 10 (06): : 1864 - 1874
  • [45] The Source of Protein or Its Value? Consumer Perception Regarding the Importance of Meat(-like) Product Attributes
    Antoniak, Marcin Adam
    Szymkowiak, Andrzej
    Peplinski, Benedykt
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [46] A meta-review of consumer behaviour studies on meat reduction and alternative protein acceptance
    Onwezen, Marleen C.
    Dagevos, Hans
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2024, 114
  • [47] Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model
    Pikkarainen, T
    Pikkarainen, K
    Karjaluoto, H
    Pahnila, S
    INTERNET RESEARCH, 2004, 14 (03) : 224 - 235
  • [48] Physicochemical Properties and Consumer Acceptance of Bread Enriched with Alternative Proteins
    Garcia-Segovia, Purificacion
    Igual, Marta
    Martinez-Monzo, Javier
    FOODS, 2020, 9 (07)
  • [49] Consumer awareness and acceptance of irradiated foods: the case of Italian consumers
    Galati, Antonino
    Moavero, Pietro
    Crescimanno, Maria
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2019, 121 (06): : 1398 - 1412
  • [50] Acceptance of a soy protein drink
    Oviedo Colon, Gustavo
    Moron de Salim, Alba
    Solano Rodriguez, Liseti
    Arpaia Manfredi, Ana
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE NUTRICION COMUNITARIA-SPANISH JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY NUTRITION, 2009, 15 (03): : 118 - 122