Consumer acceptance of mycelium as protein source

被引:0
作者
Fischer, Arnout R. H. [1 ]
Hilboesen, Owen [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Consumer behaviour; Alternative protein; Mycelium; Disgust; Consumer perception; Naturalness; FOOD; DISGUST; NANOTECHNOLOGY; VALIDATION; RISK; INFORMATION; PERCEPTIONS; SENSITIVITY; CONSUMPTION; JUDGMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105304
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The mycelium of mushroom-forming fungi represents an underappreciated protein source that can be cultivated on agricultural rest-streams and industrially prepared substrates. Consumer food options include unprocessed fresh mycelium or products derived from purified mycelium protein. Both the use of rest streams and the association of fresh mycelia with moulds can create a tension between potentially disgusting and naturalness cues. The current paper investigates this tension in a 3 (substrate: manure, wood, glucose) by 3 (level of processing: unprocessed mycelium cake, purified mycelium protein powder, burger from mycelium protein) experimental survey (N = 449). Results show that substrate source has limited impact on disgust but a slightly greater influence on perceived naturalness. Level of processing has a significant effect on both disgust and naturalness. As expected, social value and attitude based on benefit-risk trade-off inform acceptance. While effects of disgust and naturalness on benefit-risk attitude and social value balance each other, a direct effect of disgust on acceptance remains, underscoring the pivotal role of disgust in shaping consumer acceptance. This suggests for mycelium producers there is freedom of choice of substrate as it has limited effect on consumer acceptance.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Consumer innovativeness and consumer acceptance of brand extensions
    Xie, Yu
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCT AND BRAND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 17 (04) : 235 - +
  • [32] Extending the technology acceptance model and empirically testing the conceptualised consumer goods acceptance model
    Foerster, Katrin
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (06)
  • [33] Sensory Drivers of Consumer Acceptance, Purchase Intent and Emotions toward Brewed Black Coffee
    Pinsuwan, Ammaraporn
    Suwonsichon, Suntaree
    Chompreeda, Penkwan
    Prinyawiwatkul, Witoon
    FOODS, 2022, 11 (02)
  • [34] Determinants of consumer acceptance of meat analogues: Exploring measures of risk preferences in predicting consumption
    Begho, Toritseju
    Zhu, Ying
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2023, 11
  • [35] Consumer acceptance of wood-based food additives
    Stern, Tobias
    Haas, Rainer
    Meixner, Oliver
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2009, 111 (2-3): : 179 - 195
  • [36] Consumer Attitudes and Acceptance of Insects as Food and Feed: A Review
    Ngo, Hai Minh
    Moritaka, Masahiro
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE KYUSHU UNIVERSITY, 2021, 66 (02): : 259 - 266
  • [37] Neophobia, personal consumer values and novel food acceptance
    Barrena, Ramo
    Sanchez, Mercedes
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2013, 27 (01) : 72 - 84
  • [38] Consumer acceptance of brand extensions: Is parental fit preeminent?
    Miniard, Paul W.
    Alvarez, Cecilia M. O.
    Mohammed, Shazad M.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 118 : 335 - 345
  • [39] Consumer acceptance of products from carbon capture and utilization
    Lutzke, Lauren
    Arvai, Joseph
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2021, 166 (1-2)
  • [40] World Market Development and Consumer Acceptance of Irradiation Technology
    Maherani, Behnoush
    Hossain, Farah
    Criado, Paula
    Ben-Fadhel, Yosra
    Salmieri, Stephane
    Lacroix, Monique
    FOODS, 2016, 5 (04) : 1 - 21