Consumer acceptance of mycelium as protein source

被引:0
作者
Fischer, Arnout R. H. [1 ]
Hilboesen, Owen [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Consumer behaviour; Alternative protein; Mycelium; Disgust; Consumer perception; Naturalness; FOOD; DISGUST; NANOTECHNOLOGY; VALIDATION; RISK; INFORMATION; PERCEPTIONS; SENSITIVITY; CONSUMPTION; JUDGMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105304
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The mycelium of mushroom-forming fungi represents an underappreciated protein source that can be cultivated on agricultural rest-streams and industrially prepared substrates. Consumer food options include unprocessed fresh mycelium or products derived from purified mycelium protein. Both the use of rest streams and the association of fresh mycelia with moulds can create a tension between potentially disgusting and naturalness cues. The current paper investigates this tension in a 3 (substrate: manure, wood, glucose) by 3 (level of processing: unprocessed mycelium cake, purified mycelium protein powder, burger from mycelium protein) experimental survey (N = 449). Results show that substrate source has limited impact on disgust but a slightly greater influence on perceived naturalness. Level of processing has a significant effect on both disgust and naturalness. As expected, social value and attitude based on benefit-risk trade-off inform acceptance. While effects of disgust and naturalness on benefit-risk attitude and social value balance each other, a direct effect of disgust on acceptance remains, underscoring the pivotal role of disgust in shaping consumer acceptance. This suggests for mycelium producers there is freedom of choice of substrate as it has limited effect on consumer acceptance.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Development and Consumer Acceptance of Shoe Prototypes with Midsoles Made from Mushroom Mycelium Composite
    Wolfe, Megan
    Cao, Huantian
    TEXTILES, 2024, 4 (03): : 426 - 441
  • [2] Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies
    Siegrist, Michael
    Hartmann, Christina
    NATURE FOOD, 2020, 1 (06): : 343 - 350
  • [3] Consumer acceptance of food nanotechnology in Italy
    Sodano, Valeria
    Gorgitano, Maria Teresa
    Verneau, Fabio
    Vitale, Cosimo Damiano
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2016, 118 (03): : 714 - 733
  • [4] Supporters or Opponents: Will Cultural Values Shape Consumer Acceptance of Gene Editing?
    Yang, Yang
    Hobbs, Jill E.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PRODUCTS MARKETING, 2020, 26 (01) : 17 - 37
  • [5] Consumer acceptance among Dutch and German students of insects in feed and food
    Naranjo-Guevara, Natalia
    Fanter, Michelle
    Conconi, Anna Maria
    Floto-Stammen, Sonja
    FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION, 2021, 9 (01): : 414 - 428
  • [6] Consumer Perceptions and Acceptance of Edible Insects in Slovenia
    Rehman, Nayyer
    Ogrinc, Nives
    FOODS, 2024, 13 (16)
  • [7] Influencing factors towards consumer acceptance of millet as a food source
    Lacey, Jodie
    Bray, Jeffery
    Hartwell, Heather
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTRONOMY AND FOOD SCIENCE, 2025, 40
  • [8] Effects of framing, nomenclature, and aversion to tampering with nature on consumer acceptance of cultivated meat in Singapore
    Chong, Mark
    Leung, Angela K. -Y.
    Fernandez, Tricia Marjorie
    Ng, Shu Tian
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 91
  • [9] Consumer Acceptance of Alternative Proteins: A Systematic Review of Current Alternative Protein Sources and Interventions Adapted to Increase Their Acceptability
    Siddiqui, Shahida Anusha
    Alvi, Tayyaba
    Sameen, Aysha
    Khan, Sipper
    Blinov, Andrey Vladimirovich
    Nagdalian, Andrey Ashotovich
    Mehdizadeh, Mohammad
    Adli, Danung Nur
    Onwezen, Marleen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [10] Consumer acceptance of protein beverage ingredients: Less is more
    Rovai, D.
    Watson, M. E.
    Barbano, D. M.
    Drake, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2025, 108 (02) : 1392 - 1407