Towards a wellbeing economy: reflections on wellbeing budgeting in New Zealand and Australia

被引:3
作者
Moll, Jodie [1 ]
Ang, Soon Yong [2 ]
Kuruppu, Chamara [3 ]
Adhikari, Pawan [4 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Accountancy, Brisbane, Australia
[2] Univ Stirling, Stirling Management Sch, Stirling, Scotland
[3] Univ South Eastern Norway, Sch Business, Kongsberg, Norway
[4] Univ Essex, Essex Business Sch, Colchester, England
关键词
Australia; NPM; Wellbeing budgeting; New Zealand; PUBLIC MANAGEMENT; DEMOCRACY; SECTOR; IMPACT; WORK;
D O I
10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2023-0197
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis paper examines the Australian and New Zealand government's wellbeing budget reforms.Design/methodology/approachThe paper describes the development of wellbeing budgeting in Australia and New Zealand based on an analysis of official websites, documents and media sources.FindingsBoth governments have experienced challenges identifying measures representing different areas of wellbeing and recognising the connections between the measures applied. They have found it difficult to access reliable data. The development of wellbeing budgeting also raises questions about participation, data reporting, and presentation, which can impact its efficacy.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper outlines practical challenges governments face in creating and using wellbeing budgets. It proposes a future research agenda to deepen our understanding of these issues and their social and economic implications. The scope of the study is limited to publicly available documents.Originality/valueThis is one of the few studies investigating wellbeing budgeting, which has evolved as an important tool for public governance. Therefore, the study's findings may draw substantial interest and attention from practitioners, researchers and government policymakers wanting to integrate these reforms into their governance machinery.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 123 条
[1]   Guest editorial: Public sector accounting in emerging economies in the evolving post-COVID-19 era [J].
Adhikari, Pawan ;
Nkundabanyanga, Stephen Korutaro ;
Soobaroyen, Teerooven ;
Jayasinghe, Kelum .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC BUDGETING ACCOUNTING & FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 35 (03) :297-308
[2]   Implementing public sector accruals in OECD member states: Major issues and challenges [J].
Adhikari, Pawan ;
Garseth-Nesbakk, Levi .
ACCOUNTING FORUM, 2016, 40 (02) :125-142
[3]   Measuring Welfare Beyond GDP [J].
Aitken, Andrew .
NATIONAL INSTITUTE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 249 (01) :R3-R16
[4]   Participatory budgeting as a form of dialogic accounting in Russia: Actors' institutional work and reflexivity trap [J].
Aleksandrov, Evgenii ;
Bourmistrov, Anatoli ;
Grossi, Giuseppe .
ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2018, 31 (04) :1098-1123
[5]   EFFECTS OF BUDGETARY AND ACCRUALS ACCOUNTING COEXISTENCE: EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS [J].
Anessi-Pessina, Eugenio ;
Steccolini, Ileana .
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY & MANAGEMENT, 2007, 23 (02) :113-131
[6]  
Ang S. Y., 2021, Public Sector Reform and Performance Management in Emerging Economies: OutcomesBased Approaches in Practice, P174
[7]   Ethical disputes, coordinating acts and NGO accountability: Evidence from an NGO river-care programme in Malaysia [J].
Ang, Soon Yong ;
Wickramasinghe, Danture .
CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, 2023, 92
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2021, The Living Standards Framework 2021
[9]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[10]  
Bache I., 2018, The Politics of Wellbeing: Theory, Policy and Practice