The Public Legitimacy of Multistakeholder Partnerships in Global Environmental Governance: Evidence from Survey Experiments in Brazil, the United Kingdom, and the United States

被引:4
作者
Koliev, Faradj [1 ,2 ]
Backstrand, Karin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Inst Future Studies, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Environm Social Sci, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
multistakeholder partnerships; sustainable development goals (SDGs); public-private partnerships; public legitimacy; public opinion; global governance; sustainable development; PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; ORGANIZATIONS; INVOLVEMENT; SUPPORT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1162/glep_a_00746
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Multistakeholder partnerships (MSPs) in global environmental governance are either praised for their problem-solving capacities and inclusion of various societal actors or criticized for their limited accountability and corporate dominance. Despite the lively scholarly debate and the continued promotion of MSPs by international organizations and governments, knowledge about how environmental MSPs are perceived by the public is very limited. Understanding the sources of public support for MSPs is important, given its crucial role in MSPs' abilities to secure resources and achieve their goals. In this article, we evaluate whether and how institutional features of MSPs influence citizens' legitimacy beliefs. Building on previous studies, we theorize which institutional dimensions of MSPs matter for citizens' level of support. We conduct population-based survey experiments in Brazil, the United Kingdom, and the United States, encompassing more than 6,000 respondents. The results from the survey experiments have substantive implications for our understanding of the role of MSPs.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 169
页数:24
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Andonova L. B., 2022, Partnerships for Sustainability in Contemporary Global Governance, P257, DOI [10.4324/9781003148371, DOI 10.4324/9781003148371, 10.4324/9781003148371-16]
[2]  
Andonova LB, 2017, BUS PUB POL, P1, DOI 10.1017/9781316694015
[3]   Public-Private Partnerships for the Earth: Politics and Patterns of Hybrid Authority in the Multilateral System [J].
Andonova, Liliana B. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2010, 10 (02) :25-+
[4]   Transnational Climate Governance [J].
Andonova, Liliana B. ;
Betsill, Michele A. ;
Bulkeley, Harriet .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2009, 9 (02) :52-73
[5]  
Andonova LilianaB., 2003, Yearbook of International Co-Operation on Environment and Development, P19
[6]   Accountability of networked climate governance:: The rise of transnational climate partnerships [J].
Backstrand, Karin .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2008, 8 (03) :74-+
[7]   Old Wine in New Bottles? The Legitimation and Delegitimation of UN Public-Private Partnerships for Sustainable Development from the Johannesburg Summit to the Rio+20 Summit [J].
Backstrand, Karin ;
Kylsater, Mikael .
GLOBALIZATIONS, 2014, 11 (03) :331-347
[8]   How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers [J].
Bansak, Kirk ;
Hainmueller, Jens ;
Hangartner, Dominik .
SCIENCE, 2016, 354 (6309) :217-222
[9]  
Bckstrand K., 2022, Partnerships and the Sustainable Development Goals, P41, DOI [10.1007/978-3-031-07461-54, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-07461-54]
[10]   Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design [J].
Bechtel, Michael M. ;
Scheve, Kenneth F. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (34) :13763-13768