Measuring mutual engagement in the context of middle-school pair programming: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire

被引:4
作者
Xu, Fan [1 ]
Correia, Ana-Paula [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Educ Studies, 29 W Woodruff Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
来源
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
Mutual engagement; Engagement questionnaire; Dyadic collaborative learning; Pair programming; Computational thinking; Middle school; COMPUTATIONAL THINKING; PSYCHOLOGICAL-ASSESSMENT; COLLABORATIVE GROUPS; SHARED-REGULATION; HIGHER-EDUCATION; VALIDITY; IMPACT; MOTIVATION; INQUIRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100415
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
With the increasing importance of equipping young learners with computational thinking skills through learning to code, pair programming has emerged as a prevalent collaborative learning strategy in this context. Successful pair programming interventions necessitate mutual engagement between partners within a dyad. However, the measurement of mutual engagement in dyadic collaborative learning remains an under-researched area. This research represents a foundational stage in bridging this gap by developing a comprehensive 20-item PairProgramming Mutual Engagement Questionnaire (PPME-Q) as a measure of mutual engagement in pair programming at the activity level. The questionnaire was validated through a sample of 86 eighth-grade students. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the existence of a four-factor structure comprising of the behavioral, cognitive, emotional, and social engagement factors. The findings demonstrate the validity (chi 2/df = 1.32) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.888) of the PPME-Q, establishing it as an effective tool for assessing eighth graders' mutual engagement in pair programming activities. As this tool is in the nascent stages of development the measurement, we emphasize the need for further empirical studies to establish criterion validity. We also discuss the implications of these findings for future research and educational practices. This targeted instrument can then potentially be adapted or scaled to other age groups based on the insights gained.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1927, Interpretation of Educational Measurements
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Ohio's learning standards for engineering and science technologies and engineering technologies
[3]  
Beck K., 2004, EXTREME PROGRAMMING
[4]  
Blumenfeld PC, 2006, CAMB HANDB PSYCHOL, P475
[5]   The two cultures of undergraduate academic engagement [J].
Brint, Steven ;
Cantwell, Allison M. ;
Hanneman, Robert A. .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2008, 49 (05) :383-402
[6]   Mutual engagement and collocation with shared representations [J].
Bryan-Kinns, Nick .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2013, 71 (01) :76-90
[7]   Identifying mutual engagement [J].
Bryan-Kinns, Nick ;
Hamilton, Fraser .
BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 31 (02) :101-125
[8]   Understanding the Impact of Convergent Validity on Research Results [J].
Carlson, Kevin D. ;
Herdman, Andrew O. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2012, 15 (01) :17-32
[9]  
Cristobal E., 2007, MANAG SERV QUAL, V17, P317, DOI [10.1108/09604520710744326, DOI 10.1108/09604520710744326]
[10]   Improving Communication Between Pair Programmers Using Shared Gaze Awareness [J].
D'Angelo, Sarah ;
Begel, Andrew .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM SIGCHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI'17), 2017, :6245-6255