Algorithmic Decision Making in Education: Challenges and Opportunities

被引:0
作者
Levantis, Nikolaos [1 ]
Sgora, Aggeliki [1 ]
机构
[1] Ionian Univ, Dept Digital Media & Commun, Argostoli, Greece
来源
2024 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE, EDUCON 2024 | 2024年
关键词
Algorithmic Decision-making; Education; Machine Learning; Challenges; Fairness; Transparency; Accountability; Trust; AUTOMATION; TRUST; BIAS;
D O I
10.1109/EDUCON60312.2024.10578645
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Algorithmic technology has experienced significant development in recent years. With advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the proliferation of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, Algorithmic Decision-making Systems (ADSs) are embraced by several public sectors, such as health, justice, education, in order to improve their efficiency and create additional sources of information. The need for modernization has led to extended Digital Transformation projects that pose a significant impact on everyday processes but also organizations' long-term goals and even purpose. However, although the benefits, ADSs raise serious concerns in terms of transparency, fairness, and accountability, trust, etc. This paper aims to point out the major challenges related to algorithmic decision-making technology, especially in the field of education, focusing on the effectiveness and suitability of current systems based on their technological limitations. In particular, it identifies and breaks down the key challenges emerging due to the adoption of ADSs and the concerns that they create, while it also discusses the solutions proposed by experts in recent research papers. The paper also provides some thoughts for the future of ADSs in the education sector reflecting upon potential counteracting measures and conflicts with existing technologies or issues regarding the implementation of those solutions, identifying areas that need further research.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings
    Selin Akgun
    Christine Greenhow
    [J]. AI and Ethics, 2022, 2 (3): : 431 - 440
  • [2] Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability
    Ananny, Mike
    Crawford, Kate
    [J]. NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2018, 20 (03) : 973 - 989
  • [3] Balkin J, 2017, The three laws of robotics in the age of big data
  • [4] Human-Centered Tools for Coping with Imperfect Algorithms During Medical Decision-Making
    Cai, Carrie J.
    Reif, Emily
    Hegde, Narayan
    Hipp, Jason
    Kim, Been
    Smilkov, Daniel
    Wattenberg, Martin
    Viegas, Fernanda
    Corrado, Greg S.
    Stumpe, Martin C.
    Terry, Michael
    [J]. CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [5] Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
    Caliskan, Aylin
    Bryson, Joanna J.
    Narayanan, Arvind
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2017, 356 (6334) : 183 - 186
  • [6] Cerratto-Pargman T., 2023, POSTDIGITAL SCI EDUC, V5, P171, DOI [10.1007/s42438-022-00349-6, DOI 10.1007/S42438-022-00349-6]
  • [7] Cummings M.L., 2006, J TECHNOLOGY STUDIES, V32, P23, DOI [DOI 10.21061/JOTS.V32I1.A.4, DOI 10.21061/J0TS.V32I1.A.4, 10.21061/jots.v32i1.a.4]
  • [8] A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic Scores
    De-Arteaga, Maria
    Fogliato, Riccardo
    Chouldechova, Alexandra
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI'20), 2020,
  • [9] Accountability in Algorithmic Decision Making
    Diakopoulos, Nicholas
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2016, 59 (02) : 56 - 62
  • [10] Algorithm Aversion: People Erroneously Avoid Algorithms After Seeing Them Err
    Dietvorst, Berkeley J.
    Simmons, Joseph P.
    Massey, Cade
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2015, 144 (01) : 114 - 126