Clinical utility analysis of the Hoxb8 mast cell activation test for the diagnosis of peanut allergy

被引:4
作者
Bachmeier-Zbaren, Noemi [1 ]
Celik, Alper [2 ]
van Brummelen, Robin [1 ,3 ]
Roos, Nadine [1 ,3 ]
Steinmann, Melanie [1 ,3 ]
Hoang, Jennifer A. [4 ]
Yin, Xiaojun [4 ]
Ditlof, Christina M. [5 ]
Duan, Lucy [4 ]
Upton, Julia E. M. [6 ]
Kaufmann, Thomas [7 ]
Eggel, Alexander [1 ,3 ]
Eiwegger, Thomas [4 ,5 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Rheumatol & Immunol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Hosp Sick Children, Ctr Computat Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Bern, Dept Biomed Res, Lung Precis Med LPM, Bern, Switzerland
[4] Hosp Sick Children, Res Inst, Translat Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Dept Immunol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Hosp Sick Children, Dept Pediat, Div Immunol & Allergy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Bern, Inst Pharmacol, Bern, Switzerland
[8] Univ Hosp St Poelten, Dept Pediat & Adolescent Med, St Polten, Austria
[9] Karl Landsteiner Univ Hlth Sci, Krems An Der Donau, Austria
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
basophil activation test; Hoxb8 mast cell activation test; oral food challenge; peanut allergy diagnosis; specific IgE; FC-EPSILON-RI; BASOPHIL ACTIVATION; FOOD ALLERGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/all.16341
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
BackgroundPeanut allergy is among the most severe and common food allergies. The diagnosis has a significant impact on the quality of life for patients and their families. An effective management approach depends on accurate, safe, and easily implementable diagnostic methods. We previously developed a cell-based assay using Hoxb8 mast cells (Hoxb8 MCs) aimed at improving clinical allergy diagnosis. In this study, we assessed its diagnostic performance by measuring blinded sera from a prospectively enrolled and pre-validated peanut allergy cohort.MethodsHoxb8 MCs were passively sensitized with sera from peanut-allergic and peanut tolerant children and adolescents (n = 112). Degranulation of Hoxb8 MCs was quantified upon stimulation with dose-titrated peanut extract by means of flow cytometry, using CD107a as activation marker. The results from the Hoxb8 mast cell activation test (Hoxb8 MAT) were compared to established diagnostic assays such as the skin prick test (SPT), specific IgE (sIgE) levels, and the basophil activation test (BAT). Additionally, serum samples from BAT nonresponders were assessed with the Hoxb8 MAT.ResultsHoxb8 MAT displayed a robust dose-dependent activation to peanut extract, with a cutoff value of <= 5.2% CD107a positive cells. The diagnostic accuracy was highest at allergen concentrations >= 100 ng/mL, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.97, 93% sensitivity, and 96% specificity, outperforming traditional SPT and sIgE tests. When compared to BAT, Hoxb8 MAT exhibited comparable diagnostic efficacy. Moreover, sera from BAT nonresponders were accurately classified into allergics and nonallergics by the Hoxb8 MAT.ConclusionsThe Hoxb8 MAT demonstrated a very good diagnostic precision in patients prospectively assessed for peanut allergy comparable to the fresh whole blood-based BAT. Additionally, it demonstrated its value for accurate classification of BAT nonresponders into allergic and nonallergic individuals. Further investigations into its utility in the routine clinical setting are warranted. The Hoxb8 MAT demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy, as determined by measuring blinded sera from a prospectively enrolled, prevalidated peanut allergy cohort. Similar to the BAT, the Hoxb8 MAT distinguishes between allergic and nonallergic patients who underwent clinically indicated OFCs to peanut. Additionally, it has the ability to accurately classify sera from BAT nonresponders. BAT, basophil activation test; Hoxb8, homebox b 8; MAT, mast cell activation test; MCs, mast cells; OFCs, oral food challenges; sIgE/sIgG, specific IgE/IgG; SPT, skin prick test.image
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 226
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [2] Predictive value of skin prick tests using recombinant allergens for diagnosis of peanut allergy
    Astier, Catherine
    Morisset, Martine
    Roitel, Olivier
    Codreanu, Fanny
    Jacquenet, Sandrine
    Franck, Patricia
    Ogier, Virginie
    Petit, Nicolas
    Proust, Barbara
    Moneret-Vautrin, Denise-Anne
    Burks, A. Wesley
    Bihain, Bernard
    Sampson, Hugh A.
    Kanny, Gisele
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 118 (01) : 250 - 256
  • [3] BachmeierZbren N., 2022, REFERENCE MODULE FOO, DOI [10.1016/b978-0-323-96018-2.00032-8, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-323-96018-2.00032-8]
  • [4] Bahri R, 2020, METHODS MOL BIOL, V2163, P227, DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-0696-4_19
  • [5] Mast cell activation test in the diagnosis of allergic disease and anaphylaxis
    Bahri, Rajia
    Custovic, Adnan
    Korosec, Peter
    Tsoumani, Marina
    Barron, Martin
    Wu, Jiakai
    Sayers, Rebekah
    Weimann, Alf
    Ruiz-Garcia, Monica
    Patel, Nandinee
    Robb, Abigail
    Shamji, Mohamed H.
    Fontanella, Sara
    Silar, Mira
    Mills, E. N. Clare
    Simpson, Angela
    Turner, Paul J.
    Bulfone-Paus, Silvia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 142 (02) : 485 - +
  • [6] The psychosocial impact of food allergy and food hypersensitivity in children, adolescents and their families: a review
    Cummings, A. J.
    Knibb, R. C.
    King, R. M.
    Lucas, J. S.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2010, 65 (08) : 933 - 945
  • [7] A framework for measuring the social impact of food allergy across Europe: a EuroPrevall state of the art paper
    de Blok, B. M. J.
    Vlieg-Boerstra, B. J.
    Duiverman, E. J.
    DunnGalvin, A.
    Hourihane, J. O'B.
    Cornelisse-Vermaat, J. R.
    Frewer, L.
    Mills, C.
    Dubois, A. E. J.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2007, 62 (07) : 733 - 737
  • [8] Basophil activation test shows high accuracy in the diagnosis of peanut and tree nut allergy: The Markers of Nut Allergy Study
    Duan, Lucy
    Celik, Alper
    Hoang, Jennifer A.
    Schmidthaler, Klara
    So, Delvin
    Yin, Xiaojun
    Ditlof, Christina M.
    Ponce, Marta
    Upton, Julia E. M.
    Lee, Jean-Soo
    Hung, Lisa
    Breiteneder, Heimo
    Palladino, Chiara
    Atkinson, Adelle R.
    Kim, Vy H. D.
    Berenjy, Alireza
    Asper, Maria
    Hummel, David
    Wong, Samantha
    Alexanian-Farr, Mara
    Magder, Ahuva
    Chinthrajah, Sharon R.
    Mukai, Kaori
    Tsai, Mindy
    Nadeau, Kari
    Galli, Stephen J.
    Ramani, Arun K.
    Szepfalusi, Zsolt
    Eiwegger, Thomas
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2021, 76 (06) : 1800 - 1812
  • [9] Mast cell versus basophil activation test in allergy: Current status
    Ebo, Didier G.
    Bahri, Rajia
    Tontini, Chiara
    Van Gasse, Athina L.
    Mertens, Christel
    Hagendorens, Margo M.
    Sabato, Vito
    Elst, Jessy
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2024, 54 (06) : 378 - 387
  • [10] Mast cell activation tests by flow cytometry: A new diagnostic asset?
    Elst, Jessy
    van der Poorten, Marie-Line M.
    Van Gasse, Athina L.
    De Puysseleyr, Leander
    Hagendorens, Margo M.
    Faber, Margaretha A.
    Van Houdt, Michel
    Passante, Egle
    Bahri, Rajia
    Walschot, Mark
    Mertens, Christel
    Bridts, Chris H.
    Sabato, Vito
    Ebo, Didier G.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2021, 51 (11) : 1482 - 1500