Simplifying risk stratification for thyroid nodules on ultrasound: validation and performance of an artificial intelligence thyroid imaging reporting and data system

被引:2
作者
Wildman-Tobriner, Benjamin [1 ]
Yang, Jichen [2 ]
Allen, Brian C. [1 ]
Ho, Lisa M. [1 ]
Miller, Chad M. [1 ]
Mazurowski, Maciej A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Durham, NC USA
关键词
Artificial intelligence; FNA; Thyroid nodules; TI-RADS; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; AMERICAN-COLLEGE;
D O I
10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To validate the performance of a recently created risk stratification system (RSS) for thyroid nodules on ultrasound, the Artificial Intelligence Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (AI TI-RADS). Materials and methods: 378 thyroid nodules from 320 patients were included in this retrospective evaluation. All nodules had ultrasound images and had undergone fine needle aspiration (FNA). 147 nodules were Bethesda V or VI (suspicious or diagnostic for malignancy), and 231 were Bethesda II (benign). Three radiologists assigned features according to the AI TI-RADS lexicon (same categories and features as the American College of Radiology TI-RADS) to each nodule based on ultrasound images. FNA recommendations using AI TI-RADS and ACR TIRADS were then compared and sensitivity and specificity for each RSS were calculated. Results: Across three readers, mean sensitivity of AI TI-RADS was lower than ACR TI-RADS (0.69 vs 0.72, p < 0.02), while mean specificity was higher (0.40 vs 0.37, p < 0.02). Overall total number of points assigned by all three readers decreased slightly when using AI TI-RADS (5,998 for AI TI-RADS vs 6,015 for ACR TI-RADS), including more values of 0 to several features. Conclusion: AI TI-RADS performed similarly to ACR TI-RADS while eliminating point assignments for many features, allowing for simplification of future TI-RADS versions.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 699
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Performance of Five Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems in Selecting Thyroid Nodules for FNA [J].
Castellana, Marco ;
Castellana, Carlo ;
Treglia, Giorgio ;
Giorgino, Francesco ;
Giovanella, Luca ;
Russ, Gilles ;
Trimboli, Pierpaolo .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2020, 105 (05)
[2]  
Cibas ES, 2009, THYROID, V19, P1159, DOI [10.1089/thy.2009.0274, 10.1309/AJCPPHLWMI3JV4LA]
[3]   Analysis and Comparison of the Malignant Thyroid Nodules Not Recommended for Biopsy in ACR TIRADS and AI TIRADS With a Large Sample of Surgical Series [J].
Cui, Yiyang ;
Fu, Chao ;
Si, Caifeng ;
Li, Jing ;
Kang, Yaning ;
Huang, Yuanjing ;
Cui, Kefei .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (06) :1225-1233
[4]   Interobserver Variability of Sonographic Features Used in the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System [J].
Hoang, Jenny K. ;
Middleton, William D. ;
Farjat, Alfredo E. ;
Teefey, Sharlene A. ;
Abinanti, Nicole ;
Boschini, Fernando J. ;
Bronner, Abraham J. ;
Dahiya, Nirvikar ;
Hertzberg, Barbara S. ;
Newman, Justin R. ;
Scanga, Daniel ;
Vogler, Robert C. ;
Tessler, Franklin N. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (01) :162-167
[5]   Reduction in Thyroid Nodule Biopsies and Improved Accuracy with American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System [J].
Hoang, Jenny K. ;
Middleton, William D. ;
Farjat, Alfredo E. ;
Langer, Jill E. ;
Reading, Carl C. ;
Teefey, Sharlene A. ;
Abinanti, Nicole ;
Boschini, Fernando J. ;
Bronner, Abraham J. ;
Dahiya, Nirvikar ;
Hertzberg, Barbara S. ;
Newman, Justin R. ;
Scanga, Daniel ;
Vogler, Robert C. ;
Tessler, Franklin N. .
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (01) :185-193
[6]   INTER-OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY THYROID IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT [J].
Itani, Malak ;
Assaker, Richard ;
Moshiri, Mariam ;
Dubinsky, Theodore J. ;
Dighe, Manjiri K. .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 45 (02) :461-470
[7]   Macrocalcifications Do Not Alter Malignancy Risk Within the American Thyroid Association Sonographic Pattern System When Present in Non-High Suspicion Thyroid Nodules [J].
Kobaly, Kristen ;
Kim, Caroline S. ;
Langer, Jill E. ;
Mandel, Susan J. .
THYROID, 2021, 31 (10) :1542-1548
[8]   Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and utility of artificial intelligence-optimized ACR TI-RADS and original ACR TI-RADS: a multi-center validation study based on 2061 thyroid nodules [J].
Liu, Ying ;
Li, Xiaoxian ;
Yan, Cuiju ;
Liu, Longzhong ;
Liao, Ying ;
Zeng, Hongyan ;
Huang, Weijun ;
Li, Qian ;
Tao, Nansheng ;
Zhou, Jianhua .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (11) :7733-7742
[9]   Diagnostic accuracy and ability to reduce unnecessary FNAC: A comparison between four Thyroid Imaging Reporting Data System (TI-RADS) versions [J].
Tan, Lingsze ;
Tan, Ying Sern ;
Tan, Suzet .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2020, 65 :133-137
[10]   Using Artificial Intelligence to Revise ACR TI-RADS Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: Diagnostic Accuracy and Utility [J].
Wildman-Tobriner, Benjamin ;
Buda, Mateusz ;
Hoang, Jenny K. ;
Middleton, William D. ;
Thayer, David ;
Short, Ryan G. ;
Tessler, Franklin N. ;
Mazurowski, Maciei A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (01) :112-119