European legal standards of digitalization of the judiciary

被引:1
作者
Najafli, Emin [1 ,2 ]
Ponomarov, Sergiy [3 ]
Koverznev, Vadym [4 ]
Ivanov, Andrii [5 ]
机构
[1] Kharkiv Natl Univ Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine
[2] Kharkiv Diplomat Club, Kharkiv, Ukraine
[3] State Serv Special Commun & Informat Protect Ukrai, Dept State Regulat Field Commun Serv, Kyiv, Ukraine
[4] NAS Ukraine, V Mamutov Inst Econ & Legal Res, Kyiv, Ukraine
[5] State Serv Special Commun & Informat Protect Ukrai, Dept State Regulat Field Commun Serv, Kyiv, Ukraine
来源
AMAZONIA INVESTIGA | 2024年 / 13卷 / 76期
关键词
digitalization; judiciary; e-court; e-; justice; rule of law; implementation; legal standards;
D O I
10.34069/AI/2024.76.04.10
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The article reveals the content of the concept of European legal standards in the area of digitalization of the judiciary adopted as mandatory or as recommendatory typical legal principles and norms fixed (contained) in common sources of law (acquis communautaire) of the European legal system. They are the minimum legal requirements for the organization and implementation of e -justice for the EU member states. The application of these standards takes place in the course of their implementation by national laws of both the EU member states and states that are guided by the legal values of the EU and/or seek to acquire EU membership, like Ukraine. The normative basis, goals and principles of ejustice in the EU are thoroughly analysed. The key positions on the digitalization of the judiciary, which are set out in the EU legal documents containing the relevant legal standards, are defined. Attention is drawn to the fact that the main elements of e -justice, implemented in Ukraine under the influence of European standards, can be considered the following: (i) conducting electronic office work, centralized storage of cases and other procedural documents in a single database; (ii) exchange of documents and information; (iii) electronic method of determining a judge (judgerapporteur) to consider a particular case; (iv) using information and communication technologies to investigate electronic evidence; (v) trial participation in the hearing via videoconference; (vi) adoption and publication of judicial acts in electronic form.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 127
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Law of Ukraine No. 3262-ІV. On access to court decisions. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, dated
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Law of Ukraine No. 2680-VIII
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CONSULTATIVE COUNCIL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Art. 2 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the Andean Community, adopted by Decision 500 of the Andean Council of Ministers of Foreign Affairs, published in the Official Gazette of the Cartagena Agreement No. 680, P2
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 361/2006
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 276/2015
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, On Approval of State Medical and Sanitary Standards for the Permissible Content of Chemical and Biological Substances in the Atmospheric Air of Populated Areas Order 10.05.2024 No. 813
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Press release
[9]  
Atamanchuk І. V, 2019, Donetsk University Law Journal, V1, P109, DOI [10.31558/2518-7953.2019.1.13, DOI 10.31558/2518-7953.2019.1.13]
[10]  
Babenko H. O., 2021, Analytical and comparative jurisprudence, V4, P356