Socioeconomic differences in discrepancies between expected and experienced discomfort from colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy

被引:0
作者
Deding, Ulrik [1 ,2 ]
Boggild, Henrik [3 ]
Kaalby, Lasse [1 ,2 ]
Hjelmborg, Jacob [4 ]
Kobaek-Larsen, Morten [1 ,2 ]
Thygesen, Marianne Kirstine [1 ,2 ]
Schelde-Olesen, Benedicte [1 ,2 ]
Bjorsum-Meyer, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Baatrup, Gunnar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Clin Res, Odense, Denmark
[2] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Odense, Denmark
[3] Aalborg Univ, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Publ Hlth & Epidemiol, Aalborg, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Biodemog, Odense, Denmark
关键词
Socioeconomic status; Inequality; Patient discomfort; Colorectal cancer screening; Colonoscopy; Colon capsule endoscopy; CANCER SCREENING-PROGRAMS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PARTICIPATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34274
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Social inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation are evident. Barriers to screening participation include discomfort from diagnostic modalities. We aimed to describe the discomfort experienced from colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) and investigate the discrepancy between expected and experienced discomfort stratified by socioeconomic status. Methods: A randomised controlled trial was conducted offering half of the colorectal cancer screening invitees the choice between CCE and colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test. This paper includes those who elected to undergo CCE. A positive CCE elicited referral for a therapeutic colonoscopy. Participants reported their discomfort from CCE and from any following colonoscopies in electronically distributed questionnaires. Discomfort was measured using visual analogue scales and compared between socioeconomic subgroups determined by educational level and income. Results: The experienced discomfort from CCE and colonoscopy differed significantly between educational levels but not income levels. The bowel preparation contributed the most to the experienced discomfort in both CCE and colonoscopy. The discrepancy between expected and experienced discomfort from colonoscopy increased with increasing educational and income levels. A similar trend was seen in CCE between educational levels but not income levels. Conclusions: None of the results indicated a higher discomfort in lower socioeconomic subgroups. Regardless of the investigation modality, the bowel preparation was the main contributor to experienced discomfort. The discrepancy between expected and experienced discomfort did not seem to be larger in lower socioeconomic subgroups, indicating that this is not a major barrier causing inequalities in screening uptake. This is the first study investigating individual discomfort discrepancy in both CCE and colonoscopy, while being able to stratify by socioeconomic status.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Operationalizing a Rideshare Intervention for Colonoscopy Completion: Barriers, Facilitators, and Process Recommendations
    Bell-Brown, Ari
    Chew, Lisa
    Weiner, Bryan J.
    Strate, Lisa
    Balmadrid, Bryan
    Lewis, Cara C.
    Hannon, Peggy
    Inadomi, John M.
    Ramsey, Scott D.
    Issaka, Rachel B.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2022, 1
  • [2] Why do some participants in colorectal cancer screening choose not to undergo colonoscopy following a positive test result? A qualitative study
    Bie, Anne Katrine Lykke
    Brodersen, John
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2018, 36 (03) : 262 - 271
  • [3] Social determinants of colorectal cancer risk, stage, and survival: a systematic review
    Coughlin, Steven S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 35 (06) : 985 - 995
  • [4] Socioeconomic and ethnic inequities within organised colorectal cancer screening programmes worldwide
    de Klerk, C. M.
    Gupta, S.
    Dekker, E.
    Essink-Bot, M. L.
    [J]. GUT, 2018, 67 (04) : 679 - 687
  • [5] Socioeconomic differences in expected discomfort from colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy
    Deding, Ulrik
    Boggild, Henrik
    Baatrup, Gunnar
    Kaalby, Lasse
    Hjelmborg, Jacob
    Thygesen, Marianne Kirstine
    Schelde-Olesen, Benedicte
    Kobaek-Larsen, Morten
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 173
  • [6] Faecal haemoglobin concentration predicts all-cause mortality
    Deding, Ulrik
    Kaalby, Lasse
    Steele, Robert
    Al-Najami, Issam
    Kobaek-Larsen, Morten
    Plantener, Eva
    Madsen, Jeppe B.
    Madsen, Jonna S.
    Bjorsum-Meyer, Thomas
    Baatrup, Gunnar
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 184 : 21 - 29
  • [7] The Effect of Prucalopride on the Completion Rate and Polyp Detection Rate of Colon Capsule Endoscopies
    Deding, Ulrik
    Kaalby, Lasse
    Baatrup, Gunnar
    Kobaek-Larsen, Morten
    Thygesen, Marianne Kirstine
    Epstein, Owen
    Bjorsum-Meyer, Thomas
    [J]. CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 14 : 437 - 444
  • [8] Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: Interim analyses of randomized controlled trial CareForColon2015
    Deding, Ulrik
    Bjorsum-Meyer, Thomas
    Kaalby, Lasse
    Kobaek-Larsen, Morten
    Thygesen, Marianne Kirstine
    Madsen, Jeppe Buur
    Kroijer, Rasmus
    Baatrup, Gunnar
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 09 (11) : E1712 - E1719
  • [9] The effects of reminders for colorectal cancer screening: participation and inequality
    Deding, Ulrik
    Henig, Anna Sharon
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    Boggild, Henrik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 34 (01) : 141 - 150
  • [10] Sociodemographic predictors of participation in colorectal cancer screening
    Deding, Ulrik
    Henig, Anna Sharon
    Salling, Ann
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    Boggild, Henrik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (08) : 1117 - 1124