State childcare provision in China: Subnational variations and localized policy contexts across 31 mainland provinces

被引:0
作者
Liu, Wenting [1 ]
Dai, Haijing [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Social Work, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
(de)familization; childcare policy; China; comparative policy analysis; WELFARE REGIMES; GENDER; FAMILY; INEQUALITY; EAST;
D O I
10.1111/spol.13075
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The social organization of childcare is of special relevance to gender equality and family wellbeing. Childcare provision in China is often recognized as a case of familism, which highly relies on family care with limited state support. However, this all-encompassing view may mask the local discrepancy generated by a decentralized social welfare system, especially when emerging initiatives have been enacted due to the government's concern about fertility. This article analyses the variation of childcare policies across 31 China mainland provinces, from the perspective of welfare regime theory. Using hierarchical cluster analysis, six policy patterns with varying configurations of familizing and defamilizing support are identified: (1) dual-earner support, (2) moderate dual-earner support, (3) moderate support, (4) general family support, (5) modified family support, and (6) a geo-special case. We further explore the socioeconomic contexts of various policy profiles, with a particular focus on fertility and female employment. Findings suggest that, although with a nationally shared welfare ideology, subnational governments could exploit divergent strategies to support childcare in response to localized socioeconomic conditions. This research also provides insights into how childcare responsibilities are distributed between state and family in a non-western country.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Abrahamson P, 2017, J ASIAN PUBLIC POLIC, V10, P90, DOI 10.1080/17516234.2016.1258524
[2]   Gendering welfare state analysis: tensions between care and paid work [J].
Ciccia, Rossella ;
Sainsbury, Diane .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND GENDER, 2018, 1 (1-2) :93-109
[3]   The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states [J].
Daly, M ;
Lewis, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 51 (02) :281-298
[5]  
Esping-Andersen G., 1999, SOCIAL FDN POSTINDUS
[6]   Does Family Policy Influence Women's Employment?: Reviewing the Evidence in the Field [J].
Ferragina, Emanuele .
POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2019, 17 (01) :65-80
[7]   AFTER THE FAMILY WAGE - GENDER EQUITY AND THE WELFARE-STATE [J].
FRASER, N .
POLITICAL THEORY, 1994, 22 (04) :591-618
[8]   The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: a review of the literature [J].
Gauthier, Anne H. .
POPULATION RESEARCH AND POLICY REVIEW, 2007, 26 (03) :323-346
[9]  
Gornick JanetC., 2003, Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment
[10]   Local Policy Discretion in Social Welfare: Explaining Subnational Variations in China's De Facto Urban Poverty Line [J].
Guo, Yu ;
He, Alex Jingwei ;
Wang, Fei .
CHINA QUARTERLY, 2022, 249 :114-138