A Deep Learning Method for Comparing Bayesian Hierarchical Models

被引:1
作者
Elsemueller, Lasse [1 ]
Schnuerch, Martin [2 ]
Buerkner, Paul-Christian [3 ]
Radev, Stefan T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Psychol, Hauptstr 47, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Mannheim, Dept Psychol, Mannheim, Germany
[3] TU Dortmund Univ, Dept Stat, Dortmund, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Cluster Excellence STRUCTURES, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Bayesian statistics; model comparison; hierarchical modeling; deep learning; cognitive modeling; PROCESSING TREE MODELS; MONTE-CARLO; NORMALIZING CONSTANTS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1037/met0000645
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Bayesian model comparison (BMC) offers a principled approach to assessing the relative merits of competing computational models and propagating uncertainty into model selection decisions. However, BMC is often intractable for the popular class of hierarchical models due to their high-dimensional nested parameter structure. To address this intractability, we propose a deep learning method for performing BMC on any set of hierarchical models which can be instantiated as probabilistic programs. Since our method enables amortized inference, it allows efficient re-estimation of posterior model probabilities and fast performance validation prior to any real-data application. In a series of extensive validation studies, we benchmark the performance of our method against the state-of-the-art bridge sampling method and demonstrate excellent amortized inference across all BMC settings. We then showcase our method by comparing four hierarchical evidence accumulation models that have previously been deemed intractable for BMC due to partly implicit likelihoods. Additionally, we demonstrate how transfer learning can be leveraged to enhance training efficiency. We provide reproducible code for all analyses and an open-source implementation of our method.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [51] Hox J., 2017, Multilevel Analysis Techniques and Applications, V3rd, DOI 10.4324/9781315650982
  • [52] A hierarchical spatio-temporal model to analyze relative risk variations of COVID-19: a focus on Spain, Italy and Germany
    Jalilian, Abdollah
    Mateu, Jorge
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2021, 35 (04) : 797 - 812
  • [53] BAYES FACTORS
    KASS, RE
    RAFTERY, AE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 90 (430) : 773 - 795
  • [54] Kingma D. P., 2014, arXiv, DOI DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1412.6980
  • [55] HIERARCHICAL MULTINOMIAL PROCESSING TREE MODELS: A LATENT-TRAIT APPROACH
    Klauer, Karl Christoph
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2010, 75 (01) : 70 - 98
  • [56] How cognitive modeling can benefit from hierarchical Bayesian models
    Lee, Michael D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 55 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [57] Model Complexity in Diffusion Modeling: Benefits of Making the Model More Parsimonious
    Lerche, Veronika
    Voss, Andreas
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [58] A hierarchical state space approach to affective dynamics
    Lodewyckx, Tom
    Tuerlinckx, Francis
    Kuppens, Peter
    Allen, Nicholas B.
    Sheeber, Lisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 55 (01) : 68 - 83
  • [59] Lotfi Sanae, 2022, Bayesian model selection, the marginal likelihood, and generalization
  • [60] MacKay D., 2003, Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms