Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony on cognitive control in healthy adults

被引:0
作者
Narmashiri, Abdolvahed [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Res Fundamental Sci IPM, Sch Cognit Sci, Tehran, Iran
[2] Sharif Univ Technol, Sharif Brain Ctr, Elect Engn Dept, Biointelligence Res Unit, Tehran, Iran
关键词
CHOICE REACTION-TIME; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; STOP-SIGNAL; MECHANISMS; GO; PERFORMANCE; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0306609
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The efficiency of cognitive control in healthy adults can be influenced by various factors, including the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) effect and strategy training. To address these issues, our study aims to investigate the impact of SOA on single-mode cognitive control using the Go/No-Go task, as well as the manifestation of proactive control within dual mechanisms of cognitive control through the AX-CPT task. In single-mode cognitive control, extending SOA led to significantly enhanced reaction times (RTs) during Go trials, suggesting improved task performance with increased preparation time. Moreover, the analysis revealed consistently higher accuracy rates in No-Go trials than to Go trials across all SOA levels, indicating robust inhibition processes unaffected by SOA variations. In the dual mechanisms of cognitive control, significant variations in RT and accuracy were observed among different trial types. Notably, participants exhibited superior performance in detecting targets during BY trials and shorter RTs in BX trials, indicative of efficient processing of target stimuli. Conversely, prolonged RTs in AY trials suggest proactive control strategies aimed at maintaining task-relevant information and inhibiting irrelevant responses. Overall, these findings highlight the effect of SOA on single-mode cognitive control and the emergence of proactive control within dual mechanisms of cognitive control in healthy adults.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Akbari F, 2024, bioRxiv, V2024
[2]   inhibitrion and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on [J].
Aron, Adam R. ;
Robbins, Trevor W. ;
Poldrack, Russell A. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (04) :177-185
[3]   Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex [J].
Aron, AR ;
Robbins, TW ;
Poldrack, RA .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (04) :170-177
[4]   Inhibition and impulsivity: Behavioral and neural basis of response control [J].
Bari, Andrea ;
Robbins, Trevor W. .
PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2013, 108 :44-79
[5]   The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff [J].
Bogacz, Rafal ;
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan ;
Forstmann, Birte U. ;
Nieuwenhuis, Sander .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2010, 33 (01) :10-16
[6]  
Braver T. S., 2007, VARIATION WORKING ME
[7]   The Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control Project [J].
Braver, Todd S. ;
Kizhner, Alexander ;
Tang, Rongxiang ;
Freund, Michael C. ;
Etzel, Joset A. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 33 (09) :1990-2015
[8]   The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework [J].
Braver, Todd S. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (02) :106-113
[9]   Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex [J].
Braver, Todd S. ;
Paxton, Jessica L. ;
Locke, Hannah S. ;
Barch, Deanna M. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (18) :7351-7356
[10]   A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DA .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2002, 26 (07) :809-817