Comparison of the value of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in different sizes of thyroid nodules

被引:1
作者
Liu, Qi [1 ]
Ouyang, Liquan [2 ]
Zhang, Shengchu [3 ]
Yang, Yuxia [4 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Geriatr Hosp, Dept Thyroid & Breast Surg, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Yichang Cent Peoples Hosp, Dept Thyroid & Breast Surg, Yichang, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Thyroid & Breast Surg, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Yichang Cent Peoples Hosp, Dept Pathol, Yichang, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
contrast-enhanced ultrasound; nodule size; thyroid cancer; thyroid microcarcinoma; thyroid nodules; thyroid tumors; ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; MAXIMUM DIAMETER; MICROCARCINOMA; MANAGEMENT; CANCER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000039843
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (US-FNAB) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the presence of thyroid nodules of different sizes. We retrospectively analyzed 110 patients with surgically operated unimodular thyroid nodules in Yichang City Central Hospital from July 1, 2021, to April 1, 2023, all of whom underwent conventional thyroid ultrasound, CEUS, and US-FNAB, and all of whom were classified according to the size of nodules into <0.5, 0.5 to 1, and >= 1 cm groups. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the 2 methods for benign and malignant nodules were calculated. Among 110 thyroid nodules, 102 were malignant nodules and 8 were benign nodules. In patients with nodule diameters <1 cm the sensitivity of US-FNAB and CEUS was 87.02% and 93.89%, respectively, and the specificity was 100.00% and 66.67%, with an accuracy of 87.31% and 93.28%, respectively. In patients with nodule diameter <0.5 cm, the sensitivities of US-FNAB and CEUS were 74.29% and 100.00%, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05); in patients with nodule diameter 0.5 to 1 cm, the sensitivities of US-FNAB and CEUS were 79.59% and 95.92%, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05); among patients with nodule diameters >= 1 cm, the sensitivities of US-FNAB and CEUS were 88.89% and 77.78%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). For thyroid nodules <= 1 cm in diameter, the sensitivity of CEUS examination was higher than that of US-FNAB; and CEUS still has good diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules <0.5 cm, CEUS is recommended for thyroid nodules diagnosed negatively by US-FNAB with a diameter of <1 cm; and CEUS should be preferred for thyroid nodules with a diameter of <0.5 cm. CEUS should be preferred for thyroid nodules <0.5 cm in diameter.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions [J].
Gui, Yang ;
Dai, Menghua ;
Meng, Zhilan ;
Chang, Xiaoyan ;
Tan, Li ;
Zhang, Jing ;
Chen, Xueqi ;
Zhou, Tongtong ;
Zhang, Qing ;
Xiao, Mengsu ;
Lyu, Ke ;
Jiang, Yuxin .
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 135 (04) :426-432
[32]   Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration with or without Negative Pressure for Different Types of Thyroid Nodules [J].
Zhou, Qi ;
Wu, Wenjun ;
Wang, Fang ;
Gong, Xiaohua ;
Chen, Xiaojun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 :5475-5481
[33]   COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY VERSUS FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION FOR EVALUATING THYROID NODULES [J].
Chen, Bihong T. ;
Jain, Akshay B. ;
Dagis, Andrew ;
Chu, Peiguo ;
Vora, Lalit ;
Maghami, Ellie ;
Salehian, Behrouz .
ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2015, 21 (02) :128-135
[34]   Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions [J].
Gui Yang ;
Dai Menghua ;
Meng Zhilan ;
Chang Xiaoyan ;
Tan Li ;
Zhang Jing ;
Chen Xueqi ;
Zhou Tongtong ;
Zhang Qing ;
Xiao Mengsu ;
Lyu Ke ;
Jiang Yuxin .
中华医学杂志英文版, 2022, 135 (04) :426-432
[35]   The comparison of accuracy of ultrasonographic features versus ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules [J].
Nabahati, Mehrdad ;
Moazezi, Zoleika ;
Fartookzadeh, Soude ;
Mehraeen, Rahele ;
Ghaemian, Naser ;
Sharbatdaran, Majid .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND, 2019, 22 (03) :315-321
[36]   The impact of presence of Hashimoto's thyroiditis on diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in subcentimeter thyroid nodules: A retrospective study from FUSCC [J].
Gao, Lili ;
Ma, Ben ;
Zhou, Li ;
Wang, Yu ;
Yang, Shuwen ;
Qu, Ning ;
Gao, Yi ;
Ji, Qinghai .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2017, 6 (05) :1014-1022
[37]   Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for thyroid malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ospina, Naykky Singh ;
Brito, Juan P. ;
Maraka, Spyridoula ;
de Ycaza, Ana E. Espinosa ;
Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene ;
Gionfriddo, Michael R. ;
Castaneda-Guarderas, Ana ;
Benkhadra, Khalid ;
Al Nofal, Alaa ;
Erwin, Patricia ;
Morris, John C. ;
Castro, M. Regina ;
Montori, Victor M. .
ENDOCRINE, 2016, 53 (03) :651-661
[38]   Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Thyroid Biopsies in the Otolaryngology Clinic [J].
Schwartz, Joseph ;
How, Jacques ;
Lega, Iliana ;
Cote, Jeanne ;
Gologan, Olga ;
Rivera, Juan-Andres ;
Garfield, Natasha ;
Zeitouni, Anthony ;
Payne, Richard .
JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2010, 39 (04) :356-360
[39]   Impact of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for diagnosis of thyroid nodules [J].
Wang, Jing ;
Liu, Jing ;
Liu, Zhe .
MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (38)
[40]   Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules [J].
Cai, X. J. ;
Valiyaparambath, N. ;
Nixon, P. ;
Waghorn, A. ;
Giles, T. ;
Helliwell, T. .
CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2006, 17 (05) :251-256