Tumor Bed Margins Versus Specimen Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: Too Close to Call?

被引:0
|
作者
Villemure-Poliquin, Noemie [1 ]
Roy, Eve-Marie [1 ]
Nguyen, Sally [2 ]
Beauchemin, Michel [3 ]
Audet, Nathalie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Ophtalmol & Otorhinolaryngol Chirurg Cervicof, 2325 Rue Univ, Quebec City, PQ G1V OA6, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, CISSS Outaouais, Dept Chirurg, Serv Otorhinolaryngol Chirurg Cervicofaciale, Gatineau, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Anatomopathol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY | 2024年 / 53卷
关键词
squamous cell carcinoma; margin; oral cavity cancer; locoregional recurrence; free flap surgery; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; FROZEN-SECTION MARGINS; SURGICAL MARGIN; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CUT-THROUGH; HEAD; TONGUE; RESECTION; SURVIVAL; REVISION;
D O I
10.1177/19160216241278653
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Introduction The routine assessment of intraoperative margins has long been the standard of care for oral cavity cancers. However, there is a controversy surrounding the best method for sampling surgical margins. The aim of our study is to determine the precision of a new technique for sampling tumor bed margins (TBMs), to evaluate the impact on survival and the rate of free flap reconstructions. Methods This retrospective cohort study involved 156 patients with primary cancer of the tongue or floor of the mouth who underwent surgery as initial curative treatment. Patients were separated into 2 groups: one using an oriented TBM derived from Mohs' technique, where the margins are taken from the tumor bed and identified with Vicryl sutures on both the specimen and the tumor bed, and the other using a specimen margins (SMs) driven technique, where the margins are taken from the specimen after the initial resection. Clinicopathologic features, including margin status, were compared for both groups and correlated with locoregional control. Precision of per-operative TBM sampling method was obtained. Results A total of 156 patients were included in the study, of which 80 were in TBM group and 76 were in SM group. Precision analysis showed that the oriented TBM technique pertained a 50% sensitivity, 96.6% specificity, 80% positive predictive value, and an 87.5% negative predictive value. Survival analysis revealed nonstatistically significant differences in both local control (86.88% vs 83.50%; P = .81) as well as local-regional control (82.57% vs 72.32%; P = .21). There was a significant difference in the rate of free flap-surgeries between the 2 groups (30% vs 64.5%; P < .001). Conclusion Our described oriented TBM technique has demonstrated reduced risk of free flap reconstructive surgery, increased precision, and similar prognostic in terms of local control, locoregional control, and disease-free survival when compared to the SM method.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Surgical Margins and Primary Site Resection in Achieving Local Control in Oral Cancer Resections
    Varvares, Mark A.
    Poti, Shannon
    Kenyon, Bianca
    Christopher, Kara
    Walker, Ronald J.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (10) : 2298 - 2307
  • [32] PROGNOSTIC IMPORTANCE OF "CLEAR VERSUS REVISED MARGINS" IN ORAL AND PHARYNGEAL CANCER
    Kwok, Pingling
    Gleich, Otto
    Huebner, Gerhard
    Strutz, Juergen
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2010, 32 (11): : 1479 - 1484
  • [33] Incidence and impact of dysplasia at final resection margins in cancers of the oral cavity
    Singh, Arjun
    Mair, Manish
    Singhvi, Hitesh
    Ramalingam, Natarajan
    Bal, Munita
    Lamba, Komal
    Nair, Deepa
    Nair, Sudhir
    Chaturvedi, Pankaj
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2020, 140 (11) : 963 - 969
  • [34] Audit of the rates of re-excision for close or involved margins in the management of oral cancer
    Azzopardi, S.
    Lowe, D.
    Rogers, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 57 (07) : 678 - 681
  • [35] Narrow band imaging in the intra-operative definition of resection margins in oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer
    Tirelli, Giancarlo
    Piovesana, Marco
    Gatto, Annalisa
    Tofanelli, Margherita
    Biasotto, Matteo
    Nata, Francesca Boscolo
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 51 (10) : 908 - 913
  • [36] How Often is Cancer Present in Oral Cavity Re-resections After Initial Positive Margins?
    Prasad, Kavita
    Sharma, Rahul
    Habib, Daniel
    Sinard, Robert
    Mannion, Kyle
    Rohde, Sarah
    Langerman, Alexander
    Netterville, James
    Rosenthal, Eben
    Lewis, James
    Topf, Michael C.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2024, 134 (02) : 717 - 724
  • [37] Margins in Stage I and II Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma A Review From the American Head and Neck Society
    Puram, Sidharth V.
    Mays, Ashley C.
    Bayon, Rodrigo
    Bell, Diana
    Chung, Jeffson
    Fundakowski, Christopher E.
    Johnson, Bradley T.
    Massa, Sean T.
    Sharma, Arun
    Varvares, Mark A.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2023, 149 (07) : 636 - 642
  • [38] Expression profiles of selected genes in tumors and matched surgical margins in oral cavity cancer: Do we have to pay attention to the molecular analysis of the surgical margins?
    Strzelczyk, Joanna K.
    Krakowczyk, Lukasz
    Golabek, Karolina
    Owczarek, Aleksander J.
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 27 (06): : 833 - 840
  • [39] Influence of close resection margins on local recurrence and disease-specific survival in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma
    Wong, Ling Siew
    McMahon, Jeremy
    Devine, John
    McLellan, Douglas
    Thompson, Ewen
    Farrow, Adrian
    Moos, Khursheed
    Ayoub, Ashraf
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 50 (02) : 102 - 108
  • [40] Impact of microsatellite alteration in surgical margins on local recurrence in oral cavity cancer patients
    Jin-Ching Lin
    Chen-Chi Wang
    Rong-San Jiang
    Wen-Yi Wang
    Shih-An Liu
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2017, 274 : 431 - 439