Tumor Bed Margins Versus Specimen Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: Too Close to Call?

被引:0
|
作者
Villemure-Poliquin, Noemie [1 ]
Roy, Eve-Marie [1 ]
Nguyen, Sally [2 ]
Beauchemin, Michel [3 ]
Audet, Nathalie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Ophtalmol & Otorhinolaryngol Chirurg Cervicof, 2325 Rue Univ, Quebec City, PQ G1V OA6, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, CISSS Outaouais, Dept Chirurg, Serv Otorhinolaryngol Chirurg Cervicofaciale, Gatineau, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Anatomopathol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY | 2024年 / 53卷
关键词
squamous cell carcinoma; margin; oral cavity cancer; locoregional recurrence; free flap surgery; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; FROZEN-SECTION MARGINS; SURGICAL MARGIN; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CUT-THROUGH; HEAD; TONGUE; RESECTION; SURVIVAL; REVISION;
D O I
10.1177/19160216241278653
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Introduction The routine assessment of intraoperative margins has long been the standard of care for oral cavity cancers. However, there is a controversy surrounding the best method for sampling surgical margins. The aim of our study is to determine the precision of a new technique for sampling tumor bed margins (TBMs), to evaluate the impact on survival and the rate of free flap reconstructions. Methods This retrospective cohort study involved 156 patients with primary cancer of the tongue or floor of the mouth who underwent surgery as initial curative treatment. Patients were separated into 2 groups: one using an oriented TBM derived from Mohs' technique, where the margins are taken from the tumor bed and identified with Vicryl sutures on both the specimen and the tumor bed, and the other using a specimen margins (SMs) driven technique, where the margins are taken from the specimen after the initial resection. Clinicopathologic features, including margin status, were compared for both groups and correlated with locoregional control. Precision of per-operative TBM sampling method was obtained. Results A total of 156 patients were included in the study, of which 80 were in TBM group and 76 were in SM group. Precision analysis showed that the oriented TBM technique pertained a 50% sensitivity, 96.6% specificity, 80% positive predictive value, and an 87.5% negative predictive value. Survival analysis revealed nonstatistically significant differences in both local control (86.88% vs 83.50%; P = .81) as well as local-regional control (82.57% vs 72.32%; P = .21). There was a significant difference in the rate of free flap-surgeries between the 2 groups (30% vs 64.5%; P < .001). Conclusion Our described oriented TBM technique has demonstrated reduced risk of free flap reconstructive surgery, increased precision, and similar prognostic in terms of local control, locoregional control, and disease-free survival when compared to the SM method.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcome of Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Adjuvant Chemoradiation for Oral Cancers with Close Margins of Resection
    Joseph, Lini
    Mohiyuddin, S. M. Azeem
    Manjunath, G. N.
    Kalyani, R.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2023, 76 (2) : 1796 - 1804
  • [22] Positive Surgical Margins in Early Stage Oral Cavity Cancer: An Analysis of 20,602 Cases
    Luryi, Alexander L.
    Chen, Michelle M.
    Mehra, Saral
    Roman, Sanziana A.
    Sosa, Julie A.
    Judson, Benjamin L.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2014, 151 (06) : 984 - 990
  • [23] Image-Guided Intraoperative Assessment of Surgical Margins in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Cancer: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Review
    Carnicelli, Giorgia
    Disconzi, Luca
    Cerasuolo, Michele
    Casiraghi, Elena
    Costa, Guido
    De Virgilio, Armando
    Esposito, Andrea Alessandro
    Ferreli, Fabio
    Fici, Federica
    Lo Casto, Antonio
    Marra, Silvia
    Malvezzi, Luca
    Mercante, Giuseppe
    Spriano, Giuseppe
    Torzilli, Guido
    Francone, Marco
    Balzarini, Luca
    Giannitto, Caterina
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (11)
  • [24] Variation of resection margins in oral cancer in dependence of tumor stage and subsite - a retrospective cohort study
    Moratin, Julius
    Horn, Dominik
    Oehme, Marcel
    Semmelmayer, Karl
    Flechtenmacher, Christa
    Ristow, Oliver
    Held, Thomas
    Engel, Michael
    Hoffmann, Juergen
    Freudlsperger, Christian
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (06)
  • [25] High-Volume Surgeons Deliver Larger Surgical Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer
    Ellis, Owen G.
    David, Michael C.
    Park, Daniel J.
    Batstone, Martin D.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (07) : 1466 - 1472
  • [26] Immediate resection of positive margins improves local control in oral tongue cancer
    Zhang, Lisa
    Judd, Ryan T.
    Zhao, Songzhu
    Rygalski, Chandler
    Li, Michael
    Briody, Ashleigh
    Swendseid, Brian
    Blakaj, Dukagjin M.
    Agrawal, Amit
    Ozer, Enver
    Carrau, Ricardo L.
    Teknos, Theodoros N.
    VanKoevering, Kyle
    Rocco, James W.
    Old, Matthew O.
    Seim, Nolan B.
    Puram, Sidharth, V
    Haring, Catherine T.
    Kang, Stephen Y.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 141
  • [27] Outcomes of Surgical Bed Versus Tumor Margins in Trans-Oral Resection of Early Glottic Cancer
    Jacob, Tom
    Neiderman, Narin Nard Carmel
    Lior, Yotam
    Warshavsky, Anton
    Horowitz, Gilad
    Wasserzug, Oshri
    Trejo, Leonore
    Muhanna, Nidal
    Oestreicher-Kedem, Yael
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2025, : 2271 - 2276
  • [28] Transcriptomic Biomarker Signatures for Discrimination of Oral Cancer Surgical Margins
    Fox, Simon A.
    Vacher, Michael
    Farah, Camile S.
    BIOMOLECULES, 2022, 12 (03)
  • [29] Specimen-driven intraoperative assessment of resection margins should be standard of care for oral cancer patients
    Aaboubout, Yassine
    ten Hove, Ivo
    Smits, Roeland W. H.
    Hardillo, Jose A.
    Puppels, Gerwin J.
    Koljenovic, Senada
    ORAL DISEASES, 2021, 27 (01) : 111 - 116
  • [30] Decreasing loco-regional recurrence for oral cavity cancer with total Mohs margins technique
    Mathieu Bergeron
    Pierre Gauthier
    Nathalie Audet
    Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, 45