Assessment of ChatGPT generated educational material for head and neck surgery counseling☆

被引:1
作者
Mnajjed, Lana [1 ]
Patel, Rusha J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Coll Med Tulsa, Tulsa, OK USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Oklahoma City, OK USA
关键词
Artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; Counseling; Patient education;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104410
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: ChatGPT is becoming very popular as an information source for the public. The adequacy of ChatGPT generated patient counseling material has not yet been extensively assessed. Methods: ChatGPT was presented with perioperative counseling and complication questions regarding five different procedure, and accuracy of responses was assessed. The chat was then asked to present an explanation of each procedure, and quality of the responses were compared to online educational material. Results: ChatGPT responses were comprehensive when discussing counseling points commonly discussed by a provider prior to a procedure. Responses to questions on surgical complications were less accurate and comprehensive. In comparison to online educational material, ChatGPT scored at or above the median SAM and PEMAT scores for all procedures. Conclusions: ChatGPT did well addressing basic counseling points during the perioperative period, although it did not perform as well when addressing surgical complications. Chat response quality was comparable to currently available online educational material.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Evaluating ChatGPT Responses on Thyroid Nodules for Patient Education
    Campbell, Daniel J.
    Estephan, Leonard E.
    Sina, Elliott M.
    Mastrolonardo, Eric V.
    Alapati, Rahul
    Amin, Dev R.
    Cottrill, Elizabeth E.
    [J]. THYROID, 2024, 34 (03) : 371 - 377
  • [2] Comparison of Patient Education Materials Generated by Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer Versus Experts
    Hung, Ya-Ching
    Chaker, Sara C.
    Sigel, Matthew
    Saad, Mariam
    Slater, Elizabeth D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 91 (04) : 409 - 412
  • [3] History of artificial intelligence in medicine
    Kaul, Vivek
    Enslin, Sarah
    Gross, Seth A.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 92 (04) : 807 - 812
  • [4] ChatGPT Answers Common Patient Questions About Colonoscopy
    Lee, Tsung-chun
    Staller, Kyle
    Botoman, Vlaicu
    Pathipati, Mythili P.
    Varma, Sanskriti
    Kuo, Braden
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 165 (02) : 509 - +
  • [5] Application of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: An Overview
    Liu, Peng-ran
    Lu, Lin
    Zhang, Jia-yao
    Huo, Tong-tong
    Liu, Song-xiang
    Ye, Zhe-wei
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 41 (06) : 1105 - 1115
  • [6] Lund B, 2023, Libr Hi Tech News, P40
  • [7] Public Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Medicine
    Stai, Bethany
    Heller, Nick
    McSweeney, Sean
    Rickman, Jack
    Blake, Paul
    Vasdev, Ranveer
    Edgerton, Zach
    Tejpaul, Resha
    Peterson, Matt
    Rosenberg, Joel
    Kalapara, Arveen
    Regmi, Subodh
    Papanikolopoulos, Nikolaos
    Weight, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2020, 34 (10) : 1041 - 1048
  • [8] ChatGPT is fun, but not an author
    Thorp, H. Holden
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2023, 379 (6630) : 313 - 313
  • [9] Vanian J., 2022, CNBCDecember 13
  • [10] Assessing the performance of ChatGPT in answer- ing questions regarding cirrhosis and hepatocellu- lar carcinoma
    Yeo, Yee Hui
    Samaan, Jamil S.
    Ng, Wee Han
    Ting, Peng-Sheng
    Trivedi, Hirsh
    Vipani, Aarshi
    Ayoub, Walid
    Yang, Ju Dong
    Liran, Omer
    Spiegel, Brennan
    Kuo, Alexander
    [J]. CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 29 (03) : 721 - 732