Novel therapeutic regimens in previously untreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Hinojosa-Gonzalez, David E. [1 ]
Saffati, Gal [1 ]
Salgado-Garza, Gustavo [2 ]
Patel, Sagar [1 ]
Kronstedt, Shane [1 ]
Jones, Jeffrey A. [1 ,3 ]
Taylor, Jennifer M. [1 ,3 ]
Yen, Aihua E. [4 ]
Slawin, Jeremy R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Scott Dept Urol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Surg, Portland, OR USA
[3] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Bladder Canc Ctr, Daniel L Duncan Comprehens Canc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma; Overall Survival; PHASE-III TRIAL; ENFORTUMAB VEDOTIN; OPEN-LABEL; CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN; PEMBROLIZUMAB; MULTICENTER; METHOTREXATE; VINBLASTINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.07.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (muC) has historically had few effective therapeutic options. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), were introduced as therapeutic options for cisplatin-ineligible patients, however, direct head-to-head trials comparing these treatments are lacking. To address this gap, this study employs a Bayesian framework to indirectly compare the performance of ICIs as first-line agents for muC. A systematic review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating different ICI for mUC. Data was inputted into Review Manager 5.4 for pairwise meta-analysis. Data was then used to build a network in R Studio. These networks were used to model 200,000 Markov Chains via MonteCarlo sampling. The results are expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Six studies with 5,449 patients were included, 3,255 received ICI monotherapy or combination. Moreover, a total of 3,006 had PD-L1 positive tumors and 2,362 were PD-L1 negative. Median overall survival (OS) ranged from 12.1 to 31.5 months across the studies, with the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab demonstrating the most substantial reduction in the risk of death (HR 0.47 [95% CrI: 0.38, 0.58]), followed by avelumab monotherapy (HR 0.69 [95% CrI: 0.56, 0.86]). The limitations of this network meta-analysis include variability in study follow-up duration, lack of standardized methods for assessing PD-L1 positivity, and potential bias introduced by control arms with poorer survival outcomes across included trials. The enfortumab vedotin/pembrolizumab combination significantly improved survival and response rates. Avelumab showed notable single-agent activity. These findings provide a valuable framework to guide clinical decision-making and highlight priority areas for future research, including biomarker refinement and novel combination strategies to enhance antitumor immunity in this challenging malignancy. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 369
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis
    Aguiar, Pedro N., Jr.
    Santoro, Ilka Lopes
    Tadokoro, Hakaru
    Lopes, Gilberto de Lima
    Filardi, Bruno Andraus
    Oliveira, Pedro
    Mountzios, Giannis
    de Mello, Ramon Andrade
    [J]. IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2016, 8 (04) : 479 - 488
  • [2] PD-1 and PD-L1 Checkpoint Signaling Inhibition for Cancer Immunotherapy: Mechanism, Combinations, and Clinical Outcome
    Alsaab, Hashem O.
    Sau, Samaresh
    Alzhrani, Rami
    Tatiparti, Katyayani
    Bhise, Ketki
    Kashaw, Sushil K.
    Iyer, Arun K.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [3] [Anonymous], FDA grants accelerated approval to tepotinib for metastatic non-small
  • [4] [Anonymous], Cancer of the Urinary Bladder-Cancer Stat Facts
  • [5] Impact of contemporary patterns of chemotherapy utilization on survival in patients with advanced cancer of the urinary tract: a Retrospective International Study of Invasive/Advanced Cancer of the Urothelium (RISC)
    Bamias, A.
    Tzannis, K.
    Harshman, L. C.
    Crabb, S. J.
    Wong, Y. -N.
    Pal, S. Kumar
    De Giorgi, U.
    Ladoire, S.
    Agarwal, N.
    Yu, E. Y.
    Niegisch, G.
    Necchi, A.
    Sternberg, C. N.
    Srinivas, S.
    Alva, A.
    Vaishampayan, U.
    Cerbone, L.
    Liontos, M.
    Rosenberg, J.
    Powles, T.
    Bellmunt, J.
    Galsky, M. D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (02) : 361 - 369
  • [6] Treatment of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer in 2018
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    Rodriguez-Vida, Alejo
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (06) : 904 - 905
  • [7] The 2021 Updated European Association of Urology Guidelines on Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
    Cathomas, Richard
    Lorch, Anja
    Bruins, Harman M.
    Comperat, Eva M.
    Cowan, Nigel C.
    Efstathiou, Jason A.
    Fietkau, Rainer
    Gakis, Georgios
    Hernandez, Virginia
    Espinos, Estefania Linares
    Neuzillet, Yann
    Ribal, Maria J.
    Rouanne, Matthieu
    Thalmann, George N.
    van der Heijden, Antoine G.
    Veskimae, Erik
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Milowsky, Matthew I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 (01) : 95 - 103
  • [8] Enfortumab Vedotin Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targeting Nectin-4 Is a Highly Potent Therapeutic Agent in Multiple Preclinical Cancer Models
    Challita-Eid, Pia M.
    Satpayev, Daulet
    Yang, Peng
    An, Zili
    Morrison, Karen
    Shostak, Yuriy
    Raitano, Arthur
    Nadell, Rossana
    Liu, Wendy
    Lortie, Dawn Ratay
    Capo, Linnette
    Verlinsky, Alla
    Leavitt, Monica
    Malik, Faisal
    Avina, Hector
    Guevara, Claudia I.
    Dinh, Nick
    Karki, Sher
    Anand, Banmeet S.
    Pereira, Daniel S.
    Joseph, Ingrid B. J.
    Donate, Fernando
    Morrison, Kendall
    Stover, David R.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76 (10) : 3003 - 3013
  • [9] Phase III trial of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium - A trial of the eastern cooperative oncology group
    Dreicer, R
    Manola, J
    Roth, BJ
    See, WA
    Kuross, S
    Edelman, MJ
    Hudes, GR
    Wilding, G
    [J]. CANCER, 2004, 100 (08) : 1639 - 1645
  • [10] New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
    Eisenhauer, E. A.
    Therasse, P.
    Bogaerts, J.
    Schwartz, L. H.
    Sargent, D.
    Ford, R.
    Dancey, J.
    Arbuck, S.
    Gwyther, S.
    Mooney, M.
    Rubinstein, L.
    Shankar, L.
    Dodd, L.
    Kaplan, R.
    Lacombe, D.
    Verweij, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) : 228 - 247