Novel therapeutic regimens in previously untreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis

被引:2
作者
Hinojosa-Gonzalez, David E. [1 ]
Saffati, Gal [1 ]
Salgado-Garza, Gustavo [2 ]
Patel, Sagar [1 ]
Kronstedt, Shane [1 ]
Jones, Jeffrey A. [1 ,3 ]
Taylor, Jennifer M. [1 ,3 ]
Yen, Aihua E. [4 ]
Slawin, Jeremy R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Scott Dept Urol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Surg, Portland, OR USA
[3] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Bladder Canc Ctr, Daniel L Duncan Comprehens Canc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma; Overall Survival; PHASE-III TRIAL; ENFORTUMAB VEDOTIN; OPEN-LABEL; CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN; PEMBROLIZUMAB; MULTICENTER; METHOTREXATE; VINBLASTINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.07.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (muC) has historically had few effective therapeutic options. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), were introduced as therapeutic options for cisplatin-ineligible patients, however, direct head-to-head trials comparing these treatments are lacking. To address this gap, this study employs a Bayesian framework to indirectly compare the performance of ICIs as first-line agents for muC. A systematic review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating different ICI for mUC. Data was inputted into Review Manager 5.4 for pairwise meta-analysis. Data was then used to build a network in R Studio. These networks were used to model 200,000 Markov Chains via MonteCarlo sampling. The results are expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Six studies with 5,449 patients were included, 3,255 received ICI monotherapy or combination. Moreover, a total of 3,006 had PD-L1 positive tumors and 2,362 were PD-L1 negative. Median overall survival (OS) ranged from 12.1 to 31.5 months across the studies, with the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab demonstrating the most substantial reduction in the risk of death (HR 0.47 [95% CrI: 0.38, 0.58]), followed by avelumab monotherapy (HR 0.69 [95% CrI: 0.56, 0.86]). The limitations of this network meta-analysis include variability in study follow-up duration, lack of standardized methods for assessing PD-L1 positivity, and potential bias introduced by control arms with poorer survival outcomes across included trials. The enfortumab vedotin/pembrolizumab combination significantly improved survival and response rates. Avelumab showed notable single-agent activity. These findings provide a valuable framework to guide clinical decision-making and highlight priority areas for future research, including biomarker refinement and novel combination strategies to enhance antitumor immunity in this challenging malignancy. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 369
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis [J].
Aguiar, Pedro N., Jr. ;
Santoro, Ilka Lopes ;
Tadokoro, Hakaru ;
Lopes, Gilberto de Lima ;
Filardi, Bruno Andraus ;
Oliveira, Pedro ;
Mountzios, Giannis ;
de Mello, Ramon Andrade .
IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2016, 8 (04) :479-488
[2]   PD-1 and PD-L1 Checkpoint Signaling Inhibition for Cancer Immunotherapy: Mechanism, Combinations, and Clinical Outcome [J].
Alsaab, Hashem O. ;
Sau, Samaresh ;
Alzhrani, Rami ;
Tatiparti, Katyayani ;
Bhise, Ketki ;
Kashaw, Sushil K. ;
Iyer, Arun K. .
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 8
[3]  
[Anonymous], FDA grants accelerated approval to tepotinib for metastatic non-small
[4]  
[Anonymous], Cancer of the Urinary Bladder-Cancer Stat Facts
[5]   Impact of contemporary patterns of chemotherapy utilization on survival in patients with advanced cancer of the urinary tract: a Retrospective International Study of Invasive/Advanced Cancer of the Urothelium (RISC) [J].
Bamias, A. ;
Tzannis, K. ;
Harshman, L. C. ;
Crabb, S. J. ;
Wong, Y. -N. ;
Pal, S. Kumar ;
De Giorgi, U. ;
Ladoire, S. ;
Agarwal, N. ;
Yu, E. Y. ;
Niegisch, G. ;
Necchi, A. ;
Sternberg, C. N. ;
Srinivas, S. ;
Alva, A. ;
Vaishampayan, U. ;
Cerbone, L. ;
Liontos, M. ;
Rosenberg, J. ;
Powles, T. ;
Bellmunt, J. ;
Galsky, M. D. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (02) :361-369
[6]   Treatment of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer in 2018 [J].
Bellmunt, Joaquim ;
Rodriguez-Vida, Alejo .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (06) :904-905
[7]   The 2021 Updated European Association of Urology Guidelines on Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma [J].
Cathomas, Richard ;
Lorch, Anja ;
Bruins, Harman M. ;
Comperat, Eva M. ;
Cowan, Nigel C. ;
Efstathiou, Jason A. ;
Fietkau, Rainer ;
Gakis, Georgios ;
Hernandez, Virginia ;
Espinos, Estefania Linares ;
Neuzillet, Yann ;
Ribal, Maria J. ;
Rouanne, Matthieu ;
Thalmann, George N. ;
van der Heijden, Antoine G. ;
Veskimae, Erik ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Milowsky, Matthew I. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 (01) :95-103
[8]   Enfortumab Vedotin Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targeting Nectin-4 Is a Highly Potent Therapeutic Agent in Multiple Preclinical Cancer Models [J].
Challita-Eid, Pia M. ;
Satpayev, Daulet ;
Yang, Peng ;
An, Zili ;
Morrison, Karen ;
Shostak, Yuriy ;
Raitano, Arthur ;
Nadell, Rossana ;
Liu, Wendy ;
Lortie, Dawn Ratay ;
Capo, Linnette ;
Verlinsky, Alla ;
Leavitt, Monica ;
Malik, Faisal ;
Avina, Hector ;
Guevara, Claudia I. ;
Dinh, Nick ;
Karki, Sher ;
Anand, Banmeet S. ;
Pereira, Daniel S. ;
Joseph, Ingrid B. J. ;
Donate, Fernando ;
Morrison, Kendall ;
Stover, David R. .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76 (10) :3003-3013
[9]   Phase III trial of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium - A trial of the eastern cooperative oncology group [J].
Dreicer, R ;
Manola, J ;
Roth, BJ ;
See, WA ;
Kuross, S ;
Edelman, MJ ;
Hudes, GR ;
Wilding, G .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (08) :1639-1645
[10]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247