A Latent Class Analysis of Online Victim-Offender Overlap among Chinese Youth: Examining Overlap Risks across Online Deviance Types

被引:2
作者
Lin, Kai [1 ]
Zhou, You [2 ]
Xu, Boyang [3 ]
Chang, Lennon Y. C. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Int Studies & Educ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Social Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] China Univ Polit Sci & Law, Sch Criminal Justice, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Deakin Univ, Ctr Cyber Resilience & Trust, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Deakin Univ, Sch Informat Technol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
victim-offender overlap; online deviance; differential overlap risks; lifestyle theory; latent class analysis; LOW SELF-CONTROL; ROUTINE ACTIVITIES THEORY; LIFE-STYLES; VICTIMIZATION; CRIME; CYBERCRIME;
D O I
10.1177/00111287241266589
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This study aims to comprehensively test the applicability of lifestyle exposure theory (LET) against other criminogenic and victimogenic factors in predicting the differential risks of online offending-victimization overlap across multiple types of online deviance. Using self-reported survey data from 3,741 Chinese college students, the study performed Latent Class Analysis (LCA) and posterior multinomial logistic regression analysis. The LCA identified five latent classes of offending-victimization overlap, with only 6% of respondents reporting high overlap risk. Posterior multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that LET indicators and gender emerged as the most robust predictors of overlap risks compared to other theory-driven (e.g., control and routine activity theories) and sociodemographic factors. The current study accentuates the importance of methodological diversity in examining victim-offender overlap.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Akers R.L., 2019, Handbook in Crime and Deviance, P113, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-20779-3_6
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Internet Crime Report 2021
[3]  
Back S., 2018, International Journal of Cybersecurity Intelligence Cybercrime, V1, P40, DOI [DOI 10.52306/01010518VMDC9371, 10.52306/01010518VMDC9371]
[4]   The effect of self-control on victimization in the cyberworld [J].
Bossler, Adam M. ;
Holt, Thomas J. .
JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2010, 38 (03) :227-236
[5]   BACK-TRANSLATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH [J].
BRISLIN, RW .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 1 (03) :185-216
[6]   The Cybercrime Victim-Offender Overlap: Evaluating Predictors for Victims, Offenders, Victim-Offenders, and Those Who are Neither [J].
Burden, Makayla .
VICTIMS & OFFENDERS, 2025, 20 (04) :710-728
[7]   Self-Control and Crime: Beyond Gottfredson & Hirschi's Theory [J].
Burt, Callie H. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CRIMINOLOGY, VOL 3, 2020, 3 :43-73
[8]   "You are in Trouble!": A Discursive Psychological Analysis of Threatening Language in Chinese Cellphone Fraud Interactions [J].
Chen, Jinshi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE SEMIOTICS OF LAW-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE SEMIOTIQUE JURIDIQUE, 2021, 34 (04) :1065-1092
[9]  
China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (CAICT), 2020, Research report on telecom/cyber fraud intervention in evolving contexts)
[10]  
Choi KS, 2017, INT J CYBER CRIMINOL, V11, P110